PURPOSE Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; HS-10296) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in China. This double-blind phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib compared with gefitinib as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03849768 ). METHODS Patients at 53 sites in China were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either aumolertinib (110 mg) or gefitinib (250 mg) once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. RESULTS A total of 429 patients who were naïve to treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. PFS was significantly longer with aumolertinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.60; P < .0001). The median PFS with aumolertinib was 19.3 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 20.8) versus 9.9 months with gefitinib (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.6). Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups (objective response rate, 73.8% and 72.1%, respectively; disease control rate, 93.0% and 96.7%, respectively). The median duration of response was 18.1 months (95% CI, 15.2 to not applicable) with aumolertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.1) with gefitinib. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 severity (any cause) were observed in 36.4% and 35.8% of patients in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups, respectively. Rash and diarrhea (any grade) were observed in 23.4% and 16.4% of patients who received aumolertinib compared with 41.4% and 35.8% of those who received gefitinib, respectively. CONCLUSION Aumolertinib is a well-tolerated third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that could serve as a treatment option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the first-line setting.

Study design Circulating tumor cells is important in the clinical diagnosis of cancer and there are a number of circulating tumor cell detection systems associated with different isolation strategies being validated. There is a novel platform, the CytoBot 2000, which utilizes a combination of physical and immunological technologies to isolate and capture circulating tumor cells. Methods In this retrospective study, 39 lung cancer patients and 11 normal healthy individuals were enrolled and performed circulating tumor cell tests and immunofluorescence staining with CytoBot 2000. The performance of this device was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve. The clinical relevance of circulating tumor cells was assessed by Chi-square. The correlations between circulating tumor cell number and blood lymphocytes and tumor biomarkers were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Results The number of circulating tumor cell is significantly increased in lung cancer patients (3.74 > 0.45, P < .0001). The CytoBot 2000 presented a 100% (39/39) circulating tumor cell detection rate in lung cancer patients and 36% (4/11) in healthy individual blood samples, the sensitivity and specificity were 89.7% and 90.9%, respectively, and with the area under curve of 0.966. Further, there was a positive correlation between circulating tumor cell count and carcinoembryonic antigen 211 (R2 = 0.125, P = .027), but not blood lymphocytes ( P = .089). Conclusions This automatic platform showed excellent performance of circulating tumor cell detection by clinical sample. The tumor biomarkers increased with the number of circulating tumor cell in the lung cancer patients.

No abstract