No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the equivalent control authority of the conventional and circulation control (CC) wing of the aircraft and assess the energy expenditure and aerodynamic efficiency of the CC wing. Design/methodology/approach Four target cases with different flap deflection angles θ are set in advance for the conventional wing, and then a series of cases with different jet momentum coefficients Cμ are set for the CC wing. The lift, drag and momentum coefficient curves of the CC wing are compared to those of the four conventional wing cases. The curves with the best agreement are selected to establish the corresponding relation between θ and Cμ. The energy expenditure of the CC system is analyzed. The concept of equivalent lift-to-drag ratio for the CC wing is introduced to compare the aerodynamic efficiency with the conventional wing Findings The control authority of the conventional wing at θ = 0º, 10º, 20º, 30º are equivalent to the control authority of the CC wing with Cµ = 0.0, 0.005, 0.009 and 0.012. The CC system is more efficient at small Cµ than large Cµ. Practical implications This study could contribute to the application of the CC system on flapless aircrafts. Originality/value The corresponding relation between θ and Cµ is established by matching the equivalent control authority between the conventional wing and CC wing.

No abstract

For the ever-increasing power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of organic solar cells (OSCs), the exploitation of excellent volatile solid additive is an important appeal for morphology optimization and performance stabilization. Here,...

For organic photovoltaic cells, the development of new green solvents and nontoxic and halogen‐free additives is an urgent issue. Here, a simple combination of o‐xylene (O‐XY) and ethyl 2‐hydroxybenzoate (EHB) is introduced in inverted devices based on poly[4,8‐bis(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐thiophene‐2‐yl) benzo[1,2‐b;4,5‐b′] dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl‐alt‐(4‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐3‐fluorothieno[3,4‐b] thiophene)‐2‐carboxylate‐2‐6‐diyl]:[6,6]‐phenyl‐C71‐butyric acid methyl ester (PTB7‐Th:PC71BM) as blend layers, the device performance reaches optimal values (9.29%) when O‐XY and 3% EHB are introduced as additives, accompanied by the maximum fill factor (67.5%) and JSC (17.20 mA cm−2). From the results of characterization analysis, it is clear that EHB additive improves the crystallinity of the donor by regulating the kinetic process of active layer formation, selectively solubilizes the more aggregated fullerene acceptors, which allows PTB7‐Th to enter the conformational domain of PC71BM, and accelerates the molecular rearrangement. Besides, the EHB additive not only reduces the recombination, increases the carrier migration rate but also promotes the crystallinity of the donor, resulting in a tighter stacking. This work provides a green combination of solvents and additives that is important for the mass production of solar cells.

No abstract