can be efficiently produced on demand and in a decentralized manner with (photo) electrochemical methods via the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). [1][2][3][4] Despite of being the best performing HER catalysts, [5,6] noble metals such as Pt, Ir, and Pd are scarce and consequently hamper the viability of water electrolysis technologies. Hence earth-abundant materials, and notably transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ), have been extensively investigated as HER electrocatalysts. [7][8][9][10][11] The edge sites-driven hydrogen electroadsorption properties of TMDs [12,13] have prompted the fabrication of amorphous molybdenum sulfide materials (MoS x ) to minimize exposure of the electrocatalytically inert MoS 2 basal planes [14] for multiple applications. [15][16][17][18][19] A simple, yet scalable method to fabricate MoS x has been reported by substrate-insensitive electrodeposition from a [MoS 4 ] 2− precursor, [20,21] and critical properties in MoS x materials such as film thickness, [22] morphology, [23][24][25][26] Mo:S stoichiometry, [27] as well as incorporation of dopants [28][29][30] or nanocomposite formation, [31][32][33][34][35] have been easily tuned by experimental parameters.For long-term electrocatalytic applications, however, HER activity and stability of TMDs are paramount. In crystalline MoS 2 , basal plane activation, [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] edge site exposure, [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] and metal doping/incorporation/intercalation [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] are the most employed strategies.In contrast, the [Mo 3 S 13 ] 2− cluster-based polymeric structure of electrodeposited MoS x[67] requires alternative approaches to maximize activity. In addition, the detailed HER mechanism as well as the true catalytically active sites are still under debate. Whilst pioneering studies on ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) indicated the MoS 2 edge-like sites formed after MoS 3 phase transformation under in operando conditions responsible for the HER performance, [68] in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy experiments suggested terminal S 2 2− ligands (S 2 2− terminal ) to be the proton acceptor sites, [69] and more recently in situ Raman spectroscopy indicated these to be the electrochemically cleaved bridging S 2 2− ligands (S 2 2− bridging ). [70] Another study claimed that unsaturated Mo centers formed after cathodic dissolution of S 2 2− terminal to be the true HER Anodically electrodeposited amorphous molybdenum sulfide (AE-MoS x ) has attracted significant attention as a non-noble metal electrocatalyst for its high activity toward the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The [Mo 3 S 13 ] 2− polymerbased structure confers a high density of exposed sulfur moieties, widely regarded as the HER active sites. However, their intrinsic complexity conceals full understanding of their exact role in HER catalysis, hampering their full potential for water splitting applications. In this report, a unifying app...