This survey presents a comprehensive review of current literature on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods for cyber security applications. Due to the rapid development of Internetconnected systems and Artificial Intelligence in recent years, Artificial Intelligence including Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) has been widely utilized in the fields of cyber security including intrusion detection, malware detection, and spam filtering. However, although Artificial Intelligence-based approaches for the detection and defense of cyber attacks and threats are more advanced and efficient compared to the conventional signature-based and rule-based cyber security strategies, most ML-based techniques and DL-based techniques are deployed in the ''black-box'' manner, meaning that security experts and customers are unable to explain how such procedures reach particular conclusions. The deficiencies of transparencies and interpretability of existing Artificial Intelligence techniques would decrease human users' confidence in the models utilized for the defense against cyber attacks, especially in current situations where cyber attacks become increasingly diverse and complicated. Therefore, it is essential to apply XAI in the establishment of cyber security models to create more explainable models while maintaining high accuracy and allowing human users to comprehend, trust, and manage the next generation of cyber defense mechanisms. Although there are papers reviewing Artificial Intelligence applications in cyber security areas and the vast literature on applying XAI in many fields including healthcare, financial services, and criminal justice, the surprising fact is that there are currently no survey research articles that concentrate on XAI applications in cyber security. Therefore, the motivation behind the survey is to bridge the research gap by presenting a detailed and up-to-date survey of XAI approaches applicable to issues in the cyber security field. Our work is the first to propose a clear roadmap for navigating the XAI literature in the context of applications in cyber security.

We propose a forecasting technique based on multi-feature data fusion to enhance the accuracy of an electric vehicle (EV) charging station load forecasting deep-learning model. The proposed method uses multi-feature inputs based on observations of historical weather (wind speed, temperature, and humidity) data as multiple inputs to a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to achieve a robust prediction of charging loads. Weather conditions are significant influencers of the behavior of EV drivers and their driving patterns. These behavioral and driving patterns affect the charging patterns of the drivers. Rather than one prediction (step, model, or variables) made by conventional LSTM models, three charging load (energy demand) predictions of EVs were made depending on different multi-feature inputs. Data fusion was used to combine and optimize the different charging load prediction results. The performance of the final implemented model was evaluated by the mean absolute prediction error of the forecast. The implemented model had a prediction error of 3.29%. This prediction error was lower than initial prediction results by the LSTM model. The numerical results indicate an improvement in the performance of the EV load forecast, indicating that the proposed model could be used to optimize and improve EV load forecasts for electric vehicle charging stations to meet the energy requirements of EVs.

The major aim of this paper is to explain the data poisoning attacks using label-flipping during the training stage of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal-based human emotion evaluation systems deploying Machine Learning models from the attackers' perspective. Human emotion evaluation using EEG signals has consistently attracted a lot of research attention. The identification of human emotional states based on EEG signals is effective to detect potential internal threats caused by insider individuals. Nevertheless, EEG signal-based human emotion evaluation systems have shown several vulnerabilities to data poison attacks. Besides, due to the instability and complexity of the EEG signals, it is challenging to explain and analyze how data poison attacks influence the decision process of EEG signal-based human emotion evaluation systems. In this paper, from the attackers' side, data poison attacks occurring in the training phases of six different Machine Learning models including Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Extra Trees, XGBoost, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) intrude on the EEG signal-based human emotion evaluation systems using these Machine Learning models. This seeks to reduce the performance of the aforementioned Machine Learning models with regard to the classification task of 4 different human emotions using EEG signals. The findings of the experiments demonstrate that the suggested data poison assaults are model-independently successful, although various models exhibit varying levels of resilience to the attacks. In addition, the data poison attacks on the EEG signal-based human emotion evaluation systems are explained with several Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods including Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and Generated Decision Trees. And the codes of this paper are publicly available on GitHub.