Background: Dysregulated migration and invasion of endometrial stromal cells is implicated in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Hypoxia functions as critical microenvironmental factor that results in promotion of endometrial stromal cells migration and invasion through upregulation of autophagy. Paeonol functioned as a tumor suppressor in human ovarian cancer and promoted cytoprotective autophagy. However, the role of paeonol in hypoxia-induced autophagy in endometriosis remains unknown. Methods: Stromal cells were isolated from endometriotic patients by enzymatic digestion of ectopic endometrial tissues, and then characterized by immunohistochemical analysis of cytoskeleton 19 (CK19) and vimentin. Cellular morphology was evaluated under microscope. Cell viability, proliferation and apoptosis of stromal cells were assessed by Cell Counting Kit-8, EdU labeling and flow cytometry, respectively. Wound healing and transwell assays were performed to detect metastasis of the stromal cells. Hypoxia-induced autophagy was evaluated through immunohistochemistry and western blot. Results: Paeonol treatment dosage dependently decreased cell proliferation and metastasis of the ectopic endometrial stromal cells (ecESCs), while promoted the cell apoptosis. Hypoxia-induced autophagy in the ecESCs was repressed by paeonol through down-regulation of LC3-II/LC3-I and Beclin-1, while up-regulation of p62. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) was reduced post paeonol treatment, and paeonol-induced increase of p62 and decrease of LC3-II/LC3-I and Beclin-1 were reversed by over-expression of HIF-1α. Over-expression of HIF-1α also attenuated the suppressive effect of paeonol on cell growth of ecESCs. Conclusions: Paeonol attenuated HIF-1α-induced promotion of ecESCs migration and invasion through reducing autophagy, and reduced HIF-1α-induced endometriotic lesion in rats, providing potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of endometriosis.
For frozen embryo transplantation patients who failed to use hormone replacement cycle (HRC) transplantation for 2 consecutive times, the third time of transplantation was divided into 2 groups: HRC and natural cycle (NC), and the pregnancy rate of the 2 groups, especially the clinical pregnancy rate, was compared.
Retrospective study of 174 patients in the reproductive medicine center of an affiliated hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2015 and September 2018.
The 174 patients were all infertile with regular menstruation. They had undergone 2 consecutive failed cycles of endometrial preparation with hormone replacement therapy and prepare for the third frozen embryo transplantation.
A third cycle of treatment was planned using either NC or HRC for endometrial preparation. All the embryos were obtained during the same oocyte retrieval cycle. Patients were divided into groups based on the method of endometrial preparation: 98 were classified as NC and 76 as HRC.
The pregnancy outcomes for the 2 groups were compared. Confounding factors that may affect clinical pregnancy rates were analyzed.
We found that on the day of endometrial transformation, estrogen levels and endometrial thickness in the NC group were significantly higher than those in the HRC group. There were no significant differences in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, cumulative pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or live birth between the 2 groups. It is concluded by binary regression analysis that the different endometrial preparation protocol have no significant effect on the CPR.
NC is as effective as HRC after 2 previous cycles of HRC. Because this was a retrospective study design, selection bias is possible, although the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups of patients were matched.
IntroductionWomen characterised by diminished ovarian reserve are considered to have poor ovarian response (POR) according to Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) criteria. Patients in this population often have a poor prognosis for treatment with assisted reproductive technology. In previous studies, oestrogen pretreatment before ovarian stimulation has been shown to have a beneficial effect. However, recent studies presented conflicting conclusions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of oestrogen pretreatment in patients with expected POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol.Methods and analysisA prospective superiority randomised parallel controlled trial will be conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. A total of 316 patients will be randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1. In the intervention group, oral oestrogen pretreatment will be administered from day 7 after ovulation until day 2 of the next menstrual cycle. Afterwards, a flexible GnRH-ant protocol will be initiated. The control group will receive no additional intervention beyond routine ovarian stimulation. The primary outcome is the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes include the total number of retrieved metaphase II oocytes, average daily dose of gonadotropin, total gonadotropin dose and duration of ovarian stimulation, cycle cancellation rate, top quality embryos rate, blastocyst formation rate, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate and endometrial thickness on trigger day. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles.Ethics and disseminationThe ethical approval has been confirmed by the reproductive ethics committee of the affiliated hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SDUTCM/2022.9.20). In addition, written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants before the study. The results will be disseminated via publications.Trial registration numberChiCTR2200064812.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.