Forkhead box O (FOXO) transcription factors are involved in multiple signaling pathways and play critical roles in a number of physiological and pathological processes including cancer. The importance of FOXO factors ascribes them under multiple levels of regulation including phosphorylation, acetylation/deacetylation, ubiquitination and protein-protein interactions. As FOXO factors play a pivotal role in cell fate decision, mounting evidence suggests that FOXO factors function as tumor suppressors in a variety of cancers. FOXOs are actively involved in promoting apoptosis in a mitochondriaindependent and -dependent manner by inducing the expression of death receptor ligands, including Fas ligand and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, and Bcl-2 family members, such as Bim, bNIP3 and Bcl-X L , respectively. An understanding of FOXO proteins and their biology will provide new opportunities for developing more effective therapeutic approaches to treat cancer.

IntroductionProstate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the US. The most common site of prostate cancer metastasis is the bone, with up to 84% of patients demonstrating skeletal metastases (1). While initially thought to be primarily osteoblastic, it is now recognized that prostate cancer skeletal metastases have an extensive bone resorptive component (2, 3) that is caused primarily by osteoclasts (4). This accounts, in part, for the ability of bisphosphonates, which are antiosteoclastogenic agents, to diminish osteolysis, decrease pain, and improve mobility in patients with prostate cancer skeletal metastasis (5). However, the mechanisms through which prostate cancer skeletal metastases induce osteolytic lesions are not defined.The presence of an osteolytic component in prostate cancer skeletal metastases suggests that osteoclastogenesis may play a role in the establishment of these lesions. Recently, the discovery and characterization of a novel cytokine system -the TNF family member, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL, also called OPGL, TRANCE, and ODF); its receptor, receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK, also called ODAR); and its decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin (OPG, also called OCIF and TR1) -has established a common mechanism through which osteoclastogenesis is regulated in normal bone (reviewed in ref. 6). RANKL, a transmembrane molecule located on bone marrow stromal cells and osteoblasts, binds to RANK, which is located on the surface of osteoclast precursors. This ligand-receptor interaction activates NF-κB, which stimulates differentiation of osteoclast precursors to osteoclasts. OPG, also produced by osteoblasts/stromal cells, binds to RANKL, sequestering it from binding to RANK, which results in inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. The requirement for RANKL to induce osteoclastogenesis suggests that it may mediate the osteolytic component of prostate cancer skeletal lesions. However, it is currently unknown if prostate cancer uses the Prostate cancer (CaP) forms osteoblastic skeletal metastases with an underlying osteoclastic component. However, the importance of osteoclastogenesis in the development of CaP skeletal lesions is unknown. In the present study, we demonstrate that CaP cells directly induce osteoclastogenesis from osteoclast precursors in the absence of underlying stroma in vitro. CaP cells produced a soluble form of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), which accounted for the CaP-mediated osteoclastogenesis. To evaluate for the importance of osteoclastogenesis on CaP tumor development in vivo, CaP cells were injected both intratibially and subcutaneously in the same mice, followed by administration of the decoy receptor for RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG). OPG completely prevented the establishment of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic tibial tumors, as were observed in vehicle-treated animals, but it had no effect on subcutaneous tumor growth. Consistent with the role of osteoclasts in tumor development, oste...

Proper control of entry into and progression through mitosis is essential for normal cell proliferation and the maintenance of genome stability1 -4. The mammalian mitotic kinase Pololike kinase 1 (Plk1) is involved in multiple stages of mitosis5. Here we report that Forkhead Box M1 (FoxM1), a substrate of Plk1 (refs 6 -8), controls a transcriptional programme that mediates Plk1-dependent regulation of cell-cycle progression. The carboxy-terminal domain of FoxM1 binds Plk1, and phosphorylation of two key residues in this domain by Cdk1 is essential for Plk1-FoxM1 interaction. Formation of the Plk1-FoxM1 complex allows for direct phosphorylation of FoxM1 by Plk1 at G2/M and the subsequent activation of FoxM1 activity, which is required for expression of key mitotic regulators, including Plk1 itself. Thus, Plk1-dependent regulation of FoxM1 activity provides a positivefeedback loop ensuring tight regulation of transcriptional networks essential for orderly mitotic progression.Transitions through cell-cycle phases require the coordination of multiple events and are tightly regulated by protein kinases 1,2,5 . In addition, transcriptional control of key cell-cycle regulators are important for cellcycle progression 9,10 . Thus, defining the links between protein kinases and transcriptional networks is essential for an understanding of normal cell-cycle progression and how specific factors may contribute to the misregulation of this process in diseases.In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the polo kinase Cdc5p coordinates cellcycle-dependent transcription at G2/M by directly phosphorylating and regulating the activity of a co-activator © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 6 Correspondence should be addressed to J.C. or D.J.T (e-mail: junjie.chen@yale.edu; tindall.donald@mayo.edu). AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Z.F. performed most of experiments, analysed the data and wrote the paper; L.M. and J.M.V. analysed the time-lapse imaging data; J.H. performed the experiments shown in Fig. S2a and b; W. W. and H. L. synthesized ON01910; Z.F. and J.C. designed the experiments; J.C. and D.J. T. supervised the study and revised the paper. COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTSThe authors declare no competing financial interests. The mammalian transcription factor Forkhead Box M1 (FoxM1) is important in regulating mitotic entry and subsequent execution of the mitotic programme by controlling the expression of a cluster of G2/M target genes 6, 8 , 18. However, the mechanisms regulating the activation of FoxM1 at specific cell-cycle phases, and how this contributes to G2/M progression are largely unknown.Here, using yeast two-hybrid screening, we identified FoxM1 as a direct binding partner of Plk1. Six of the twenty-four positive clones encoded various lengths of the FoxM1 C terminus, with the smallest clone encoding residues 463-748 of FoxM1. These initial results suggest that there is a link between Plk1 and a transcription factor controlling a G2/M transcriptional programme.In vitro translated FoxM1 associated with GST-fused P...

The very process of deregulated oncogene expression during cancer development also sensitizes cancer cells to apoptotic signals (1-3). Deregulated oncoproteins such as E1a and c-Myc promote apoptosis by activating multiple downstream proapoptotic effector pathways (4, 5). Additional mechanisms of sensitizing cancer cells to apoptosis by an activated oncoprotein have been described (6, 7). For example, E2F sensitized cells to apoptosis through down-regulation of anti-apoptotic signals (7). Here we show that cancer cells can also be sensitized to apoptosis by up-regulating the expression levels of RKIP (Raf kinase inhibitor protein). RKIP was originally identified as an interacting partner of Raf-1 and a negative regulator of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade initiated by Raf-1 (8). RKIP also inhibits nuclear factor B (NF-B)1 signaling by negatively modulating the activating phosphorylation of IKK␣ and IKK␤ via upstream kinases (9). Although the molecular mechanism by which RKIP inhibits the Raf and NF-B signaling pathways has been partially delineated, little is known about the biological relevance of the inhibition of these pathways by RKIP. In addition to these functions, we presently demonstrate the rapid up-regulation of RKIP during induction of chemotherapy-triggered apoptosis in human prostate and breast cancer cells. However, in DNA-damaging agent-resistant cancer cells, treatment with the drugs does not up-regulate RKIP expression. Ectopic expression of RKIP sensitizes DNA damage agentresistant cells to undergo apoptosis. Down-regulation of RKIP expression confers resistance to 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) by releasing its inhibitory constraint on two major survival pathways in cancer cells. Our studies suggest that RKIP represents a novel apoptotic marker in human cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODSCell Lines, Plasmid Constructs, and Chemicals-The human breast cell lines 578T and 578Bst were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). A human breast cancer MCF7 cell subline resistant to 9NC treatment was a gift from Dr. Ray Frackelton (Brown University). The human prostate cell lines LNCaP, DU145, and PC3 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. Early (Ͻ30)-or late (Ͼ100)-passage DU145 cells were not used for this study. The 9NC-resistant DU145 cell subline, RC1, was established by continuous exposure of DU145 cells to 9NC (10). All cell lines were grown in conditions suggested by American Type Culture Collection. MCF7 and

RKIP does not influence the tumorigenic properties of human prostate cancer cells. It appears to be a novel and clinically relevant suppressor of metastasis that may function by decreasing vascular invasion.