Although the importance of external involvement has been recognized, under what conditions it is more effective is still unclear. To address this research gap, this study explores the moderating roles of three dimensions of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between external involvement and green product innovation based on contingency theory and organizational information processing theory. We examine the research hypotheses employing survey data collected from 198 Chinese manufacturing firms and using hierarchical moderated regression analyses. The results indicate that both customer involvement and supplier involvement have positive effects on green product innovation. Technological uncertainty strengthens the effects of customer involvement and supplier involvement on green product innovation. However, demand uncertainty fails to moderate the relationship between customer involvement and green product innovation, and supply uncertainty fails to moderate the relationship between supplier involvement and green product innovation. This study provides novel and fruitful research avenues for stakeholder involvement and suggests future directions.
Although the importance of green customer integration has been emphasized, previous findings on how green customer integration influences green product innovation are still inconsistent. To better understand the link between green customer integration and green product innovation, we divided green customer integration into two dimensions (i.e., green customer process integration and green customer information integration) and examine its green spillover effect. On the basis of the survey data from 176 Chinese manufacturers, we found that the impacts of two dimensions of green customer integration on green product innovation are mediated by quality of information sharing. Although both are significant, green customer process integration has a stronger effect on quality of information sharing than green customer information integration. In addition, internal integration positively moderates the relationship between quality of information sharing and green product innovation. Thus, this study helps to unpack the “black‐box” of how green customer integration influences green product innovation and offers a possible explanation for the previous inconsistent findings.
With its focus on locational context, International Business (IB) is a prime candidate for the application of Case Study (CS) methodology. Yet many IB scholars still have doubts about CSs, possibly because strategies for their selection and disclosure procedures may lack rigor. The purpose of this article is to document and discuss CS selection in IB research, make suggestions for improvement, and thus raise the standard and status of CS research.Using qualitative content analysis, this paper examines CS selection strategies in four IB journals (1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014), relating them to chosen theoretical purposes and logics employed. Our results indicate that 12% of the 333 investigated CS articles lacked a section on methodology, and 41% of papers reported no indication of how CSs were selected. Drawing insights from the dataset, we propose and distinguish between theory-driven and phenomenon-driven CS selection approaches. In light of our evidence, best-practice papers are identified and apportioned to coherent pathways connecting theoretical purpose, logic and CS selection strategies. In doing so, we address the link between case selection and theorizing in CSs and advocate greater methodological sophistication and transparency of CS selection reporting in IB research.
In this paper, we examine the relationship between water disclosure and firm risk.Specifically, based upon a panel dataset of 334 Chinese listed firms operating in highly water-sensitive industries during 2010-2015, we use regression models to analyze the relationships between water disclosure and three types of firm risk (i.e., total risk, systematic risk, and idiosyncratic risk) and the moderating effects of media coverage on these relationships. Our empirical results show that (a) although there are no significant relationships between water disclosure and total risk and idiosyncratic risk, there is a significant negative relationship between water disclosure and systematic risk; (b) negative media coverage weakens the negative relationship between water disclosure and systematic risk, whereas nonnegative media coverage reinforces this negative relationship. Our cornerstone study examines the effect of a specific type of environmental disclosure (i.e., water disclosure) on firm risk, and our empirical findings are different from previous studies, which examined the effects of overall corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on firm risk. We analyze the causes of the differences in detail. With this study, we make theoretical, empirical, and managerial contributions to CSR disclosure-firm risk research in business ethics literature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.