Numerous attacks, such as worms, phishing, and botnets, threaten the availability of the Internet, the integrity of its hosts, and the privacy of its users. A core element of defense against these attacks is anti-virus (AV) software-a service that detects, removes, and characterizes these threats. The ability of these products to successfully characterize these threats has far-reaching effects-from facilitating sharing across organizations, to detecting the emergence of new threats, and assessing risk in quarantine and cleanup. In this paper, we examine the ability of existing host-based anti-virus products to provide semantically meaningful information about the malicious software and tools (or malware) used by attackers. Using a large, recent collection of malware that spans a variety of attack vectors (e.g., spyware, worms, spam), we show that different AV products characterize malware in ways that are inconsistent across AV products, incomplete across malware, and that fail to be concise in their semantics. To address these limitations, we propose a new classification technique that describes malware behavior in terms of system state changes (e.g., files written, processes created) rather than in sequences or patterns of system calls. To address the sheer volume of malware and diversity of its behavior, we provide a method for automatically categorizing these profiles of malware into groups that reflect similar classes of behaviors and demonstrate how behavior-based clustering provides a more direct and effective way of classifying and analyzing Internet malware.

Many threats that plague today 's networks (e.g., phishing, botnets, denial

While many role mining algorithms have been proposed in recent years, there lacks a comprehensive study to compare these algorithms. These role mining algorithms have been evaluated when they were proposed, but the evaluations were using different datasets and evaluation criteria. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive framework for evaluating role mining algorithms. We categorize role mining algorithms into two classes based on their outputs; Class 1 algorithms output a sequence of prioritized roles while Class 2 algorithms output complete RBAC states. We then develop techniques that enable us to compare these algorithms directly. We also introduce a new role mining algorithm and two new ways for algorithmically generating datasets for evaluation. Using synthetic as well as real datasets, we compared nine role mining algorithms. Our results illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms.

Abstract. China filters Internet traffic in and out of the country. In order to circumvent the firewall, it is helpful to know where the filtering occurs. In this work, we explore the AS-level topology of China's network, and probe the firewall to find the locations of filtering devices. We find that even though most filtering occurs in border ASes, choke points also exist in many provincial networks. The result suggests that two major ISPs in China have different approaches placing filtering devices.

Administration of large-scale RBAC systems is a challenging open problem. We propose a principled approach in designing and analyzing administrative models for RBAC. We identify six design requirements for administrative models of RBAC. These design requirements are motivated by three principles for designing security mechanisms: (1) flexibility and scalability, (2) psychological acceptability, and (3) economy of mechanism. We then use these requirements to analyze several approaches to RBAC administration, including ARBAC97 [21,23,22], SARBAC [4,5], and the RBAC system in the Oracle DBMS. Based on these requirements and the lessons learned in analyzing existing approaches, we design UARBAC, a new family of administrative models for RBAC that has significant advantages over existing models.