The clinical significance and management (surgical excision vs. follow-up) of the patients with the diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) on core needle biopsy (CNB) are actually under discussion. Using standardized criteria and precise terminology, we analyzed retrospectively our CNB diagnosis of FEA, dividing patients with pure FEA as the most advanced pathologic lesion from patients with FEA associated to atypical ductal hyperplasia (FEA+ADH). Both the categories were correlated with radiologic data and findings on subsequent surgery. We evaluated 875 core needle biopsies (11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted procedure), performed over a 5-year period. A CNB diagnosis of pure FEA was made in 33/875 (3.7%) cases; in other 11 (1.2%) cases we observed the coexistence of FEA and ADH. Subsequent surgical excisions were available in 20/33 pure FEA and in 10/11 FEA+ADH: of the 20 patients with pure FEA on CNB, none had either ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma in their excisional biopsy, whereas 3/10 (30%) FEA+ADH on CNB showed, at subsequent surgery, more advanced lesions (2 ductal carcinoma in situ, 1 invasive carcinoma). Our results suggest that patients with an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted CNB diagnosis of pure FEA (especially if related to a small radiologic target, completely or almost completely removed by the needle biopsy procedure) could be spared surgical excision and managed with close radiologic follow-up.

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an effective tool for axillary staging in patients with invasive breast cancer. This procedure has been recently proposed as part of the treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), because cases of undetected invasive foci and nodal metastases occasionally occur. However, the indications for SLN biopsy in DCIS patients are controversial.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThe acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction technique is widely known, but discouraging results due to early postoperative complications have been reported. As the literature identifies seroma as the most common issue after breast surgery without identifying its pathogenesis, we aimed to report the trend of postoperative daily serum collection after ADM-assisted breast reconstruction and compare it with data in the literature in order to discover more about this little-known topic.MethodsA retrospective study on 28 consecutive patients who received ADM-assisted breast reconstruction between February 2013 and February 2014 was performed. In order to reduce the number of variables that could affect serum production, only one brand of ADM was used and all tissues were handled gently and precisely. The daily drainage volume was recorded per patient during the first four days of hospitalization. Likewise, postoperative complications were noted during routine follow-up.ResultsIn total, five (17.9%) bilateral and 23 (82.1%) unilateral ADM-assisted breast reconstructions (33 implants) were performed. The mean age, body mass index, and length of hospital stay were 53.6 years, 21.3 kg/m2, and 4.5 days, respectively. One major complication led to implant loss (3.0%), and nine minor complications were successfully treated with ambulatory surgery (27.3%). Serum collection linearly decreased after 24 hours postoperatively.ConclusionsDaily drainage decreased following the theoretical decline of acute inflammation. In concordance with the literature, daily serum production may not be related to the use of ADM.

No abstract

Background: Women with early stage disease not only have a better prognosis, but also have the opportunity to preserve their breasts. Despite the positive evidence and outcomes for breast-conserving therapy (BCT), many women are unable or unwilling to undergo 5–7 weeks of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We report the results of a single-institution phase II trial of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using a single dose of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with low risk early stage breast cancer. Methods and materials: From July 2006 to December 2009, 226 patients suitable for BCT were enrolled in a phase II trial with IOERT as radical treatment immediately after surgical resection. All patients had biopsy proven cancer. After the surgeon temporarily re-approximated the excision cavity, a dose of 21 Gy using IOERT was delivered to the tumor bed with a margin of 2 cm laterally. Results: No acute reactions were reported after irradiation. Three patients experienced a transient edema. In 7 others a haematoma was observed. No cases of liponecrosis were observed. With a mean follow-up of 49 months (range 31–66 months), only one case of local recurrence has been reported. The observed toxicity was considered acceptable. As to cosmetic results, at 6 months after the end of IORT, 71/226 patients (31.4.%) had a score of 2 for symmetry and contour (asymmetry exhibited by 1/3 or less of volume breast), while 19/226 (8.4%) had a score 3 (asymmetry greater than 1/3 of breast volume). These findings remained unchanged at the following examinations. No breast oedema, discoloration at site or scar prominence were observed. Discussion: IOERT has significant advantages compared to other post-operative APBI approaches. The surgical re-approximation of the tumor bed, combined with the high quality of electron beam radiation, generates substantially more uniform dose distributions. IOERT offers the advantage of an excellent delineation of the tumor bed under visual control and high sparing of normal tissue, including the skin. IOERT delivers a very high biologically dose at the time of the surgery, when residual tumor cells are more rapidly proliferating. IOERT is insensitive to chemotherapy sequencing since all of the radiation is given during the surgery. IOERT offers low-risk women the possibility of a one-day procedure to treat their cancer and preserve their breast. The results of our study are very encouraging compared with other series with IOERT or APBI. The absolute recurrence rate of 0.4% and the recurrence rate per year of 0.2% of the present study are lower compared to the ones from the largest series with IOERT ever published (3.6% and 1.2%, respectively) (1). Conclusion: APBI using a single dose of IOERT can be delivered safely in women with early, low risk breast cancer. A longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its efficacy compared to that of the current standard treatment of whole breast irradiation. References 1. Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini A, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy during breast conserving surgery: a study on 1,822 cases treated with electrons. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 124:141–151. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-08.