Background Overcrowding, abuse of antibiotics and increasing antimicrobial resistance negatively affect neonatal survival rates in developing countries. We aimed to define pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of early-onset sepsis (EOS), hospital-acquired late-onset sepsis (HALOS) and community-acquired late-onset sepsis (CALOS) in 25 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China. Study design This retrospective descriptive study included pathogens and their AMR from all neonates with bloodstream infections (BSIs) admitted to 25 tertiary hospitals in China from January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. We defined EOS as the occurrence of BSI at or before 72 h of life and late-onset sepsis (LOS) if BSI occurred after 72 h of life. LOS were classified as CALOS if occurrence of BSI was ≤ 48 h after admission, and HALOS, if occurrence was > 48 h after admission. Results We identified 1092 pathogens of BSIs in 1088 infants from 25 NICUs. Thirty-two percent of all pathogens were responsible for EOS, 64.3% HALOS, and 3.7% CALOS. Gram-negative (GN) bacteria accounted for a majority of pathogens in EOS (56.7%) and HALOS (62.2%). The most frequent pathogens causing EOS were Escherichia coli (27.2%) and group B streptococcus (GBS; 14.6%) whereas in CALOS they were GBS (46.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (41.5%). Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.9%), Escherichia coli (15.7%) and Fungi (12.8%) were the top three isolates in HALOS. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance rates in GN bacteria ranged from 9.7 to 55.6% in EOS and 26% to 63.3% in HALOS. Carbapenem resistance rates in GN bacteria ranged from 2.7 to 31.3% in HALOS and only six isolates in EOS were carbapenem resistant. High rates of multidrug resistance were observed in Klebsiella pneumoniae (60.7%) in HALOS and in Escherichia coli (44.4%) in EOS. All gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin except for three Enterococcus faecalis in HALOS. All-cause mortality was higher among neonates with EOS than HALOS (7.4% VS 4.4%, [OR] 0.577, 95% CI 0.337–0.989; P = 0.045). Conclusions Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and GBS were the leading pathogens in EOS, HALOS and CALOS, respectively. The high proportion of pathogens and high degree of antimicrobial resistance in HALOS underscore understanding of the pathogenesis and emphasise the need to devise effective interventions in developing countries.
PTEN is a critical tumor suppressor gene mutated frequently in various human cancers. Previous studies have showed that PTEN mRNA expression is down-regulated by TGF-beta1 in various cell lines. In present study, we have found that TGF-beta1 down-regulates PTEN mRNA and protein expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner in hepatocarcinoma cell line SMMC-7721. Based on the PTEN promoter dual-luciferase report assay, we have found that PTEN transcription is not affected by TGF-beta1. By using transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D (Act D), the turnover rate of PTEN transcripts appeared to be accelerated during TGF-beta1 stimulation, which indicated that down-regulation of PTEN by TGF-beta1 was post-transcriptional. What interested us was that transfection of PTEN coding sequence increased TGF-beta1-induced degradation of PTEN mRNA, suggesting that PTEN coding region was account for TGF-beta1-mediated down-regulation of PTEN. In addition, TGF-beta1 down-regulated PTEN expression was blocked by the TbetaIR inhibitor SB431542 and the p38 inhibitor SB203580, suggesting Smad and p38 MAPK signal pathways played crucial roles in PTEN down-regulation via TGF-beta1 stimulation. In this study, we also found TGF-beta1 accelerated down-regulation of PTEN through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Collectively, our data clearly demonstrated that TGF-beta1-mediated down-regulation of PTEN was post-transcriptional and post-translational, depending on its coding sequence, Smad and p38-MAPK signal pathways were involved in this down-regulation.
AimsEarly‐onset sepsis (EOS) is a common disease in neonates with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Piperacillin/tazobactam has been used extensively and empirically for EOS treatment without clinically validated dosing regimens, although the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of piperacillin in neonates has been reported. Therefore, we wanted to study the effectiveness and tolerance of a PPK model‐based dosing regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam in EOS patients.MethodsA prospective, single‐centre, phase II clinical study of piperacillin/tazobactam in neonates with EOS was conducted. The dosing regimen (90 mg·kg−1, q8h) was determined based on a previous piperacillin PPK model in young infants using NONMEM v7.4. The pharmacodynamics (PD) target (70%fT > MIC, free drug concentration above MIC during 70% of the dosing interval) attainment was calculated using NONMEM combined with an opportunistic sampling design. The clinical treatment data were collected.ResultsA total of 52 neonates were screened and 49 neonates completed their piperacillin/tazobactam treatment course and were included in this analysis. The median (range) values of postmenstrual age were 33.57 (range 26.14–41.29) weeks. Forty‐seven (96%) neonates reached their PD target. Eight (16%) neonates experienced treatment failure clinically. The mean (SD, range) duration of treatment and length of hospitalization were 100.1 (62.2, 36.2–305.8) hours and 31 (30, 5–123) days. There were no obvious adverse events and no infection‐related deaths occurred in the first month of life.ConclusionsA model‐based dosing regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam was evaluated clinically, was tolerated well and was determined to be effective for EOS treatment.
BackgroundOvercrowding, abuse of antibiotics and increase of antimicrobial resistance negatively affect neonatal survival rates in developing countries. We aimed to define pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of early-onset sepsis (EOS), hospital-acquired late-onset sepsis (HALOS) and community-acquired late-onset sepsis (CALOS) in 25 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China.Study designThis retrospective descriptive study included pathogens and their AMR from all neonates with bloodstream infections (BSIs) admitted to 25 tertiary hospitals in China from January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. We defined EOS as the occurrence of BSI at or before 72 hours of life and late-onset sepsis (LOS) if BSI occurred after 72 hours of life. LOS were classified as CALOS if occurrence of BSI was ≤ 48 hours after admission, and HALOS, if occurrence was > 48 hours after admission.Results1092 pathogens of BSIs collected from 25 NICUs including 349 EOS isolates, 702 HALOS isolates and 41 CALOS isolates. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) dominated in EOS (56.7%) and HALOS (62.2%). The most frequent pathogens causing EOS were Escherichia coli (27.2%) and group B streptococcus (GBS; 14.6%) whereas in CALOS they were GBS (46.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (41.5%). Klebsiella pneumonia (27.9%), Escherichia coli (15.7%) and fungi (12.8%) were the top three isolates in HALOS. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance rates in GNB ranged from 9.7–55.6% in EOS and 26–63.3% in HALOS. Carbapenem resistance rates in GNB ranged from 2.7–31.3% in HALOS and only six isolates in EOS were carbapenem resistant. High rates of multidrug resistance were observed in Klebsiella pneumonia (60.7%) in HALOS and in Escherichia coli (44.4%) in EOS. All gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin except for three Enterococcus faecalis in HALOS. The adverse outcome rates in HALOS were high, ranging from 4.6–16.2%.ConclusionsEscherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and GBS were the leading pathogens in EOS, HALOS and CALOS, respectively. The high proportion of pathogens, high degree of antimicrobial resistance and high proportion of adverse outcomes in HALOS underscore understanding of the pathogenesis and devise effective interventions in developing countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.