Abstract(Trans)dermal drug therapy is gaining increasing importance in the modern drug development. To fully utilize the potential of this route, it is important to optimize the delivery of active ingredient/drug into/through the skin. The optimal carrier/vehicle can enhance the desired outcome of the therapy therefore the optimization of skin formulations is often included in the early stages of the product development. A rational approach in designing and optimizing skin formulations requires well-defined skin models, able to identify and evaluate the intrinsic properties of the formulation. Most of the current optimization relies on the use of suitable ex vivo animal/human models.However, increasing restrictions in use and handling of animals and human skin stimulated the search for suitable artificial skin models. This review attempts to provide an unbiased overview of the most commonly used models, with emphasis on their limitations and advantages. The choice of the most applicable in vitro model for the particular purpose should be based on the interplay between the availability, easiness of the use, cost and the respective limitations.

Biofilm targeting represents a great challenge for effective antimicrobial therapy. Increased biofilm resistance, even with the elevated concentrations of very potent antimicrobial agents, often leads to failed therapeutic outcome. Application of biocompatible nanomicrobials, particularly liposomally-associated nanomicrobials, presents a promising approach for improved drug delivery to bacterial cells and biofilms. Versatile manipulations of liposomal physicochemical properties, such as the bilayer composition, membrane fluidity, size, surface charge and coating, enable development of liposomes with desired pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. This review attempts to provide an unbiased overview of investigations of liposomes destined to treat bacterial biofilms. Different strategies including the recent advancements in liposomal design aiming at eradication of existing biofilms and prevention of biofilm formation, as well as respective limitations, are discussed in more details.

16The choice of drug therapy in pregnant patients suffering from vaginal infections is limited 17 by the safety profile of the drug. Assuring the efficient topical therapy to avoid systemic 18 absorption is considered the best therapy option. Chitosan-coated liposomes have been 19 developed and optimized to assure localized therapy of clotrimazole. Chitosan was selected 20 as mucoadhesive polymer both to prolong system's retention at the vaginal site and act on 21 biofilms responsible for high recurrence of infections. Sonicated liposomes were coated 22 with chitosan in three different concentrations, namely 0.1, 0.3 and 0.6 % (w/v).

Objective: Development of liposomal mucoadhesive drug delivery system, which is able to improve the bioavailability of poorly absorbed oral drugs by prolonging their gastric and intestinal residence time, through facilitating the intimate contact of the delivery system with the absorption membrane. Materials and methods: Liposomes containing model drug atenolol were prepared by the modified ethanol injection method. Liposomes containing atenolol were coated by different mucoadhesive polymers, for example, chitosan, Carbopol 974P, Eudragit L100, and Eudragit S100, to optimize the choice of coating material. The delivery systems were tested for their in vitro mucoadhesiveness. Results: Liposomes prepared by the ethanol injection method were of satisfactory size (around 100 nm, before coating). Through the coating of liposomes in the presence of unentrapped material, the entrapment efficiency for drug was increased. In vitro mucoadhesive test confirmed the mucoadhesive properties of the coated layer for all tested polymers; however, Eudragit S100-coated liposomes were superior to other coating materials. Discussion: Eudragit coating appeared to be an optimal polymer choice. These preliminary data indicate that polymer-coated mucoadhesive liposomes are able to carry sufficient amount of drug and to remain attached to the intestinal mucosa for a sufficient period of time to enable prolonged absorption of entrapped drug. Conclusion: While keeping in mind that the in vivo conditions may vary with the in vitro ones, we may recommend the system described in our work for possible oral delivery of peptides and phytochemicals.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Penetration potential of vesicles destined for trans(dermal) administration remains to be of great interests both in respect to drug therapy and cosmetic treatment. This study investigated the applicability of the phospholipid vesicle-based permeation assay (PVPA) as a novel in vitro skin barrier model for screening purposes in preformulation studies. Various classes of liposomes containing hydrophilic model drug were examined, including conventional liposomes (CLs), deformable liposomes (DLs) and propylene glycol liposomes (PGLs). The size, surface charge, membrane deformability and entrapment efficiency were found to be affected by the vesicle lipid concentration, the presence of the surfactant and propylene glycol. All liposomes exhibited prolonged drug release profiles with an initial burst effect followed by a slower release phase. The permeation of the drug from all of the tested liposomes, as assessed with the mimicked stratum corneum--PVPA model, was significantly enhanced as compared to the permeability of the drug in solution form. Although the DLs and the PGLs exhibited almost the same membrane elasticity, the permeability of the drug delivered by PGLs was higher (6.2 × 10⁻⁶ cm/s) than DLs (5.5 × 10⁻⁶ cm/s). Therefore, this study confirmed both the potential of liposomes as vesicles in trans(dermal) delivery and potential of the newly developed skin-PVPA for the screening and optimization of liposomes at the early preformulation stage.