Crystalline coordination polymers tend to be brittle and inelastic, however, we now describe a family of such compounds that are capable of displaying mechanical elasticity in response to external pressure. The design approach successfully targets structural features that are critical for producing the desired mechanical output. The elastic crystals all comprise 1D cadmium(II) halide polymeric chains with adjacent metal centres bridged by two halide ions resulting in the required stacking interactions and short “4 Å” crystallographic axes. These polymeric chains (structural “spines”) are further organized via hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds perpendicular to the direction of the chains. By carefully altering the strength and the geometry of these non‐covalent interactions, we have demonstrated that it is possible to control the extent of elastic bending in crystalline coordination compounds.

No abstract

No abstract

Crystalline coordination polymers tend to be brittle and inelastic, however, we now describe a family of such compounds that are capable of displaying mechanical elasticity in response to external pressure. The design approach successfully targets structural features that are critical for producing the desired mechanical output. The elastic crystals all comprise 1D cadmium(II) halide polymeric chains with adjacent metal centres bridged by two halide ions resulting in the required stacking interactions and short “4 Å” crystallographic axes. These polymeric chains (structural “spines”) are further organized via hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds perpendicular to the direction of the chains. By carefully altering the strength and the geometry of these non‐covalent interactions, we have demonstrated that it is possible to control the extent of elastic bending in crystalline coordination compounds.

The mechanical adaptability of a family of six one-dimensional crystalline coordination polymers (CPs) of cadmium ([CdX2(3-X′py)2] n ; 1: X = Br, X′ = Cl, 2: X = I, X′ = Cl, 3: X = I, X′ = Br, 4: X = Cl, X′ = I, 5: X = Br, X′ = I, and 6: X, X′ = I) to applied external force was examined, and a plethora of flexible responses was noticed. While two of the six CPs (4 and 6) were slightly elastic, the remaining four CPs (1–3 and 5) presented variable plastic deformation; three of these (1–3) displayed exceptional crystal flow, and one (2) demonstrated unprecedented ductility of crystalline metal–organic material. The feature was examined by theory and custom-designed experiments, and it was shown that specific and directional intermolecular interactions are not only the most influential structural feature in determining the type of mechanical responses (i.e., elastic vs plastic), with interlocking of adjacent molecules playing only a supportive role, but also an unavoidable tool for dialing-in a diversity of plastic responses in Cd­(II) coordination polymers.