No abstract

The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures (UITF) is a controversial issue in the current literature. The aim of this study was to compare the curative effects of distal fixation modular stem (DFMS) hemiarthroplasty with proximal femoral nailing (PFN) on UITFs in the elderly. From February 2017 to November 2019, 98 elderly (≥65 years) patients with UITF were included in this single-center retrospective cohort study. Mean follow-up duration was 24.1±11.9 months. Patients were divided into the DFMS group (52 patients) and the PFN group (46 patients). In the DFMS group, trochanteric fixation was performed using a trochanteric cable plate system. Primary outcome measures included Harris hip score (HHS), mobility score, implant related complications and mortality. Secondary outcome measures included hospitalization duration, surgical time and transfusion rate. Mean age of the patients was 78.7±7.2 years (65-96 years). DFMS group had longer surgical time, higher transfusion rates and longer hospital stays (p<0.05). Mean HHS was 80.7±10.5 and 81.9±12.2 in the DFMS group and PFN group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of HHS, mobility score and mortality. Implant failure rates were significantly higher in the PFN group (p=0.015). Implant failure, one year mortality and overall mortality rates were 0%, 15.4% and 17.3% in DFMS group and 10.9%, 15.2% and 19.5% in PFN group, respectively. Both surgical methods can be effectively used in the treatment of UITFs with similar satisfactory functional results and similar mortality rates. In addition, the DFMS group exhibited significantly lower implant failure rates and PFN group provided significantly lower surgical time duration, transfusion rate and hospital stay duration.

Background: Olecranon fractures are rare conditions in childhood. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the results in surgically treated pediatric and adolescent olecranon fractures. Methods: The orthopaedic trauma database of a large academic tertiary center was retrospectively searched for patients who had sustained an olecranon fracture and were treated surgically between 2005 and 2021. Data related to demographic features, additional fractures, and the presence of any disease were obtained from the patient files. Mayo elbow performance score and the Turkish-language version of the shortened version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scale were the main functional outcome measurements. Results: The study included 37 elbows of 34 patients with an average age at the time of surgery of 10.9±3.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 78.2±48.0 months (range, 12 to 196 mo). The 1-year fracture rate of contralateral olecranon was 75% in osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Concomitant fractures were 7 proximal radius, 1 medial epicondyle, and 2 capitellum fractures. The surgical treatment methods were tension band wiring (TBW), open reduction and isolated K-wire fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CR-PP), and open reduction-plate fixation. The mean implant removal time in patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation was 2.2 months, open reduction and isolated K-wire fixation 4.7 months, and TBW 12.7 months (P=0.004). The mean disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scale was 1.9. The mean Mayo elbow performance score was 100. Grade 1 elbow arthritis was determined in 3 patients. No patient underwent revision surgery. Conclusions: All treatment modalities provided excellent long-term functional results and low complication rates without the need for revision. Closed reduction-percutaneous fixation and open reduction-isolated K-wire fixation were associated with shorter implant removal times compared with TBW. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Aim: The wound closure method applied after total knee replacement, plays a critical role in the success of the surgery. Various skin closure methods have been described in the literature in order to reduce infection rates, shorten the surgical time, and increase patient satisfaction. However, there is no standardized guideline on which type of suture should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and safety of staples with prolene sutures in wound closure after total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: Eighty-five patients that underwent total knee arthroplasty between January 2021 and October 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the wound closure method. The two groups were compared in terms of wound complication rate, operative time, postoperative hospitalization duration, and Likert scale level of patient satisfaction. Results: The majority (87.1%) of the patients were women . The mean age of the patients was 64.6±7.2 (range, 45-79). The prolene suture group had no wound complications while the staples group had five (11.9%) (p

Aim: In surgical treatment of instability, constrained acetabular inserts are frequently used in hip arthroplasty. However the reasons why surgeons avoid constrained acetabular components are the concern of an increased rate of loosening possibly due to impingement and the concern of decreased range of motion. This study aims to investigate the influence of constrained acetabular insert usage on hip range of motions and functional results.Material and Methods: Twenty-eight patients who needed revision hip arthroplasty were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to acetabular insert used in surgery (constrained and non-constrained). Mean follow-up period was 61±7 months (range, 50-74) in constrained group and 59±7 (range, 50-72) in non-constrained group. Hip range of motion and harris hip scores were recorded pre-operatively and at final follow-up. Results:The final avarage flexion, abduction, adduction, external rotation and internal rotation was respectively 78°±15°, 43°±4°, 28°±3°, 30°±7°,19°±8° in constrained group (n=15) and 75°±14°, 40°±6°, 26°±5°, 30°±12°, 17°±6° in non-constrained group (n=13). The difference between groups was not statistically significant. Harris hip score increased in both groups and there was no significant difference between groups (p=0.730). Conclusion:Findings of this mid term study showed that hip range of motions and functional results in patients with constrained acetabular inserts are not inferior than the patients with non-constrained inserts.