Background:Trastuzumab targets the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncogene and in combination with first-line therapy results in significantly improved survival outcomes and has thus become standard of care in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. While it is estimated that 1% to 4% of patients treated with trastuzumab will develop heart failure and ∼10% will experience a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the patient risk factors associated with trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC) are unclear. This meta-analysis aims to consolidate previously published data to identify the risk factors most likely leading to TIC.Methods:A search of the MEDLINE literature database using the keywords trastuzumab/Herceptin, risk factors, outcomes, cardiac, cardiotoxicity, cardiomyopathy, LVEF, and chemotherapy was performed. Only prospective/retrospective human studies were included, with additional studies excluded if they reported baseline LVEF > 68%, a cohort of <50 patients, or results that were not stratified based on cardiotoxic events. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each potential risk factor were calculated, with heterogeneity of data and samples explored using random-effects modeling.Results:Data were collected from 17 articles, capturing 6527 patients. Hypertension (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14–2.26; P < 0.01), diabetes (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.10–2.38; P < 0.02), previous anthracycline use (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.17–3.92; P < 0.02), and older age (P = 0.013) were all shown to be associated with TIC.Conclusion:Cardiac performance should be closely monitored in women treated with trastuzumab. Recognizing potential risk factors along with careful attention to symptoms/LVEF measurements could minimize the occurrence of TIC in this population.

Red cell exchange (RCE) is a common procedure in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). Implantable dual lumen Vortex (DLV) ports can be used for RCE in patients with poor peripheral venous access. We performed a retrospective cohort study of RCE procedures performed in adults with SCD. The main objective of the study was to compare the inlet speed, duration of procedures and rate of complications performed through DLV ports to those performed through temporary central venous and peripheral catheters. Twenty-nine adults with SCD underwent a total of 318 RCE procedures. Twenty adults had DLV ports placed and 218 procedures were performed using DLV ports. Mean length of follow-up after DLV port placement was 397 ± 263 days. Six DLV ports were removed due to infection and 1 for malfunction after a mean of 171 ± 120 days. Compared to temporary central venous and peripheral catheters, DLV port procedures had a greater rate of procedural complications, a longer duration, and a lower inlet speed (all P < 0.01). When accounting for the maximum allowable inlet speed to avoid citrate toxicity, 40% of DLV port procedures were greater than 10% below maximum speed, compared to 7 and 14% of procedures performed through temporary central venous and peripheral catheters (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, DLV ports can be used for RCE in adults with SCD, albeit with more procedural complications and longer duration. The smaller internal diameter and longer catheter of DLV ports compared to temporary central venous catheters likely accounts for the differences noted.

Our study shows that ER+/PR- breast cancer tumors are associated with a significantly higher Oncotype DX scores; this interprets into a higher risk of recurrence. Our data also show that the concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 99.3% for ER and lower at 88.7% for PR.

No abstract

Follow this and additional works at: https://aurora.org/jpcrr Part of the Cardiology Commons, Chemicals and Drugs Commons, and the Oncology Commons Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews ( JPCRR) is a peerreviewed scientific journal whose mission is to communicate clinical and bench research findings, with the goal of improving the quality of human health, the care of the individual patient, and the care of populations.

BackgroundAcute haemolytic transfusion reactions due to ABO incompatible blood transfusion remain a leading cause of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality in the USA. Erroneous patient identification and specimen labelling account for many errors that lead to ABO mistransfusions; these errors are largely preventable.MethodsOur hospital requires a two-sample process of ABO/Rh typing prior to transfusion. Both samples must be drawn independently. To prevent simultaneous sample draw, our second sample tube has a unique pink top that is only available from the blood bank and can only be sent to the patient’s floor once the first sample arrives in the lab. We performed an audit of this process from 19 March to 30 July 2014 and 19 March to 30 July 2015.ResultsWe reviewed type and crossmatch orders for 2702 new patients during the audit period and 824 patients (30.5%) required transfusion. All patients evaluated received compatible blood, and no mistransfusions were recorded using this method. Three per cent of testing was performed incorrectly, which safely defaulted to giving type O blood.ConclusionsThe two-sample protocol used by our institution can decrease the risk of mistransfusion. Our protocol was relatively inexpensive, safe, efficient and practical for adaptation by other hospitals.

No abstract

Background: Androgen receptor (AR) expression has emerged as a potential prognostic and predictive marker in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with AR positive and AR negative TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: 107 patients with TNBC subtype, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between June 2006 and March 2016 were evaluated for AR expression. Androgen receptors were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining (clone AR441, Dilution 1:50, Dako-Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) using whole tissue sections from archived paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed (FFPE) blocks. AR positive was defined as ≥10% nuclear stained cells. Correlation of AR expression was examined with age, BMI, race, menopausal status, tumor grade, tumor size, and lymph node involvement, and response and outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine an association with AR expression and pathologic response and survival outcomes. Results: Fifty-eight patients with available tumor specimens were stained, with twenty (34.5%) being AR-positive and thirty-eight (65.5%) being AR negative. Median age was 49 years and median follow up was 5.7 years. All patients received anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 13 patients (23%) receiving an additional platinum chemotherapy. BRCA mutation positivity was 7% for the entire group. No differences in age, menopausal status, BMI, race, tumor size and lymph node involvement were observed between the two groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in tumor grade between the two groups (p=0.008). Overall pCR rate was 28% with no difference between the two groups (30% vs 26%, p=0.56). There was no statistically significant difference in median DFS (5.9 years vs 5.2 years ( p =0.94) and median OS (6.2 years vs 5.4 years, p =0.98) between the AR positive and AR negative groups. Conclusions: Our study did not find an association of AR status and the pathologic responses or survival outcomes in patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies exploring the prognostic and predictive role of AR in patients with TNBC are warranted.