Tumors in the pelvic region cause deformation and destruction of bony structures. Because the original pelvic anatomy cannot be adequately assessed at the tumor site, reconstruction with patient-specific implants is required. A widely used strategy for the reconstructive planning is mirroring of the contralateral side. We analyzed the statistical shape model (SSM)-based reconstruction method and compared it with the mirroring approach. Our approach used a gender-specific pelvic SSM (n = 50 for each gender) to generate implant geometries. The main objectives of this study were to analyze and evaluate the virtual anatomical reconstruction of eight tumor-damaged pelvic bones using the SSM approach. We achieved an overall mean deviation distance of 0.89 mm and 1.26 mm for the reconstruction of the equivalent defect in the healthy hemipelvis. Quantitative comparison with the mirroring method showed that the SSM-based reconstruction method reconstructs the defect with the same clinically acceptable accuracy as the mirroring method. The study demonstrates that the presented model can be a valuable tool for the planning of pelvic reconstructive surgery and implant design.
In this paper we introduce the extendable and cross-platform software framework JULIUS, which will become public available by the end of this year. JULIUS consists of three conceptual layers and provides diverse assistance for medical visualization, surgical planning and image-guided navigation. The system features a modular and portable design and combines both pre-operative planning and intra-operative assistance within one single environment.
BackgroundDynamic three-dimensional (3D) deformation of the pelvic bones is a crucial factor in the successful design and longevity of complex orthopaedic oncological implants. The current solutions are often not very promising for the patient; thus it would be interesting to measure the dynamic 3D-deformation of the whole pelvic bone in order to get a more realistic dataset for a better implant design. Therefore we hypothesis if it would be possible to combine a material testing machine with a 3D video motion capturing system, used in clinical gait analysis, to measure the sub millimetre deformation of a whole pelvis specimen.MethodA pelvis specimen was placed in a standing position on a material testing machine. Passive reflective markers, traceable by the 3D video motion capturing system, were fixed to the bony surface of the pelvis specimen. While applying a dynamic sinusoidal load the 3D-movement of the markers was recorded by the cameras and afterwards the 3D-deformation of the pelvis specimen was computed. The accuracy of the 3D-movement of the markers was verified with 3D-displacement curve with a step function using a manual driven 3D micro-motion-stage.ResultsThe resulting accuracy of the measurement system depended on the number of cameras tracking a marker. The noise level for a marker seen by two cameras was during the stationary phase of the calibration procedure ± 0.036 mm, and ± 0.022 mm if tracked by 6 cameras. The detectable 3D-movement performed by the 3D-micro-motion-stage was smaller than the noise level of the 3D-video motion capturing system. Therefore the limiting factor of the setup was the noise level, which resulted in a measurement accuracy for the dynamic test setup of ± 0.036 mm.ConclusionThis 3D test setup opens new possibilities in dynamic testing of wide range materials, like anatomical specimens, biomaterials, and its combinations. The resulting 3D-deformation dataset can be used for a better estimation of material characteristics of the underlying structures. This is an important factor in a reliable biomechanical modelling and simulation as well as in a successful design of complex implants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.