Background and Objectives: Several studies have reported a low rate of pathological examination of the placentas and a poor utilization of pathology reports. We assessed Saudi obstetricians’ awareness and utilization of the placental pathological examination guidelines of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and evaluated their understanding of the reports. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to obstetricians registered in the Saudi Commission of Health Specialties database. We examined the association between the participants’ level of training or practice as well as their institution type with the surveyed elements. Results: Of 292 respondents, 34.2% were aware of the CAP guidelines. Most of them were practicing in government hospitals. Moreover, 18.2% of them routinely sent the placenta for pathological examination, and approximately 70.5% routinely reviewed the pathology reports and understood the nomenclature used; these percentages were significantly higher among university hospital practitioners. The residents were the least aware of the CAP guidelines and the least likely to review and understand the pathology reports. Regardless of the CAP guidelines awareness, the most common indication for placental pathologic examination was fetal anomalies, followed by medicolegal reasons and infections. Conclusions: Placental pathologic examination appeared uniformly underutilized in Saudi Arabia. Obstetricians are required to generate awareness of the need to comply with the CAP guidelines and to improve the understanding and utilization of pathology reports.
Contraception is a critical tool in achieving favorable family planning, which has been reported with remarkable outcomes on the individual and country-based levels. Using contraceptive approaches has been reported to be cost efficacious with minimal side effects. It gives couples more freedom, privacy and control over their lives, which might also enhance the quality of life of these individuals. In the present study, we have reviewed evidence from current studies in the literature about the different approaches to contraception in primary care. We have discussed the different barrier and non-barrier approaches that have been validated in the literature as efficacious approaches that can achieve contraception. We also reviewed the safety profiles for the different modalities and whether they can be used or not. Overall, couples should consult with the primary care physician before approaching any modality to give them a better judgment about the potential benefits and risks of each suitable contraception tool. We suggest that educational campaigns should also be conducted to increase awareness and attitude about family planning and using contraceptive modalities to expand the application and favorable outcomes of using these tools.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.