BACKGROUND:Pediatric patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) treated at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) have lower mortality than those treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs) or mixed trauma centers (MTCs). The primary objective of this study was to determine if adolescent patients (15-17 years) with isolated severe TBI also benefited from treatment at PTCs. METHODS:This was a cross-sectional analysis using a national sample of adolescent trauma patients obtained from the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Program Participant Use Files for 2013 to 2017 (n = 3,524). Mortality, the primary outcome variable, was compared between Level I PTCs, ATCs, and MTCs using multiple logistic regression controlling for patient characteristics and injury severity. Secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, utilization of craniotomy, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. RESULTS:Prior to adjustment, patients treated at ATCs (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; p = 0.032) and MTCs (OR, 2.36; p = 0.070) appeared to be at greater risk of mortality than those treated at PTCs. However, after adjustment, this difference disappeared (ATC OR, 1.21; p = 0.733; MTC OR, 0.95; p = 0.919). Patients treated at ATCs and MTCs were more severely injured than those treated at PTCs and more likely to be admitted to an ICU (ATC OR, 2.12; p < 0.001; MTC OR, 1.91; p < 0.001). No other secondary outcome differed between center types. CONCLUSION:Adolescent patients with isolated severe TBI treated at ATCs and MTCs had similar mortality risk as those treated at PTCs. The difference in injury severity across center types warrants additional research.

Background Increasing numbers of facilities are pursuing verification as pediatric trauma centers. Nurses need effective training to provide optimal care for pediatric trauma patients. This study evaluated the implementation of a nursing-focused education strategy that accompanied the process of opening a pediatric trauma center. Method Training comprised a lecture series, skills stations, and simulation. Participation was recorded. Pre- and post-training surveys were used to evaluate effectiveness. Results Participation in training was high (lectures, n = 185; skills stations, n = 151; simulation, n = 301). Survey responses indicated an increased confidence to treat pediatric trauma patients (2 out of 5 vs. 3 out of 5; p < .001). Nearly half (49.1%) of the nurses found simulations to be the most effective element of training on the post-training survey. Conclusion High participation and improved confidence indicate a feasible and effective training curriculum. Simulation was perceived as the most effective training modality. [ J Contin Educ Nurs . 2022;53(9):405–410.]

ObjectivesCurrent guidelines for screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) are commonly based on the expanded Denver criteria, a set of risk factors that identifies patients who require CT-angiographic (CTA) screening for these injuries. Based on previously published data from our center, we have adopted a more liberal screening guideline than those outlined in the expanded Denver criteria. This entails routine CTA of the neck for all blunt trauma patients already undergoing CT of the cervical spine and/or CTA of the chest. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of patients with BCVI who did not meet any of the risk factors included in the expanded Denver criteria.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with BCVI between June 2014 and December 2019 at a Level I Trauma Center were identified from the trauma registry. Medical records were reviewed for the presence or absence of risk factors as outlined in the expanded Denver criteria. Demographic data, time to CTA and treatment, BCVI grade, Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score were collected.ResultsDuring the study period, 17 054 blunt trauma patients were evaluated, and 29% (4923) underwent CTA of the neck to screen for BCVI. 191 BCVIs were identified in 160 patients (0.94% of all blunt trauma patients, 3.25% of patients screened with CTA). 16% (25 of 160) of patients with BCVI had none of the risk factors outlined in the Denver criteria.ConclusionOur findings indicate that reliance on the expanded Denver criteria alone for BCVI screening will result in missed injuries. We recommend CTA screening in all patients with blunt trauma undergoing CT of the cervical spine and/or CTA of the chest to minimize this risk.Level of evidenceLevel III, therapeutic/care management.