Numerous protocols have been described for producing neural retina from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), many of which are based on the culture of 3D organoids. Although nearly all such methods yield at least partial segments of retinal structure with a mature appearance, variabilities exist within and between organoids that can change over a protracted time course of differentiation. Adding to this complexity are potential differences in the composition and configuration of retinal organoids when viewed across multiple differentiations and hPSC lines. In an effort to understand better the current capabilities and limitations of these cultures, we generated retinal organoids from 16 hPSC lines and monitored their appearance and structural organization over time by light microscopy, immunocytochemistry, metabolic imaging and electron microscopy. We also employed optical coherence tomography and 3D imaging techniques to assess and compare whole or broad regions of organoids to avoid selection bias. Results from this study led to the development of a practical staging system to reduce inconsistencies in retinal organoid cultures and increase rigor when utilizing them in developmental studies, disease modeling and transplantation.

Purpose Breast cancer continues to be the most prevalent cancer affecting women. Many reconstructive options exist after oncologic resection. Breast reconstruction can have a lasting impact on many areas of the patient's life, and therefore, a high consideration for patient satisfaction is crucial. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide an important tool in the evaluation of different surgical methodologies. The aim of this comprehensive systematic review is to look at various surgical modalities in breast reconstruction as they relate to patient satisfaction. Methods A PubMed PRISMA search was performed. Criteria for inclusion included nipple‐sparing or skin‐sparing mastectomy with autologous or implant‐based reconstruction, level 2 volume displacement or volume replacement oncoplastic surgery, and measurement of patient‐reported outcomes using the BREAST‐Q or other validated PROMs. From the data set, weighted proportions were generated and analyzed using the Kruskal‐Wallis rank sum test and a post hoc Dunn's test. Results After obtaining 254 full text copies, 43 articles met inclusion criteria and were included. Analysis of BREAST‐Q data showed oncoplastic breast surgery was significantly preferred over mastectomy regardless of the type of reconstruction. Nipple‐sparing was significantly preferred over skin‐sparing mastectomy, autologous reconstruction was significantly preferred over implant‐based reconstruction, and prepectoral implant placement was preferred over subpectoral implant placement. Validated PROMs other than BREAST‐Q showed similar trends in all but type of mastectomy. Conclusions In this comprehensive systematic review, oncoplastic surgery showed the most favorable PROMs when compared to other reconstructive modalities. Autologous was preferred over implant‐based reconstruction, and prepectoral was preferred over subpectoral implant placement.

Background: The coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has swiftly spread throughout the globe, greatly influencing all aspects of life. As in previous pandemics, concerns for limited resources and a sustainable medical workforce have been on the forefront of infrastructure modifications. Consequently, surgical specialties have needed to consider each surgical case for necessity and safety during the COVID-19 outbreak. At our institution, availability of SARS-CoV-2 assay has allowed preoperative testing of asymptomatic surgical patients. Aim/Objective: To better define the prevalence of asymptomatic carriers in a surgical population and to better understand the impact of testing on our personal protective equipment (PPE) supply. Methods: We began routine, preoperative testing for all asymptomatic patients coming to our academic medical centre on 30 March 2020. Scheduled surgeries were deemed urgent by the surgeon with a review for appropriateness by a novel surgical committee. A retrospective patient chart review was performed. Emergency surgeries were excluded. Asymptomatic patients with positive test results had their surgeries rescheduled at the discretion of the surgeon and patient. Patients who tested negative underwent surgery with staff using standard PPE. Results: Eighty-four asymptomatic surgical patients were tested preoperatively with three (3.6%) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Preoperative testing saved 498 N95 respirators over this time period. Discussion: This is the first report of routine COVID-19 preoperative testing in an asymptomatic surgical population. Within this population, there is a 3.6% rate of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers. Through this practice, personnel exposure can be minimised and access to PPE can be preserved.

Introduction Following breast cancer surgery, patients often require adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy for locoregional and systemic disease control. These procedures may result in postoperative complications, which may delay adjuvant therapy. To potentially decrease these complications, hemostatic agents may be used. This study evaluated the rate of postoperative bleeding complications and duration of Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain use in oncologic breast surgery with and without hemostatic agents. Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed. Patients who underwent oncoplastic breast surgery, mastectomy with or without expander/implant-based reconstruction, and subsequent reconstruction with expander to implant exchange were included. Data collected included indication for surgery, type of operation, use of hemostatic agent, specifically fibrin sealant (FS, EVICEL®, Ethicon, USA) or combination powder (CP, HEMOBLAST™ Bellows, biom’up, France), length of follow-up, time to JP drain removal, and post-operative complications (seroma, hematoma, or operating room (OR) takeback). This was a consecutive experience where initially no hemostatic agent was used, followed by use of FS, and then CP. Results The use of a hemostatic agent resulted in fewer bleeding complications and significantly decreased time until JP drain removal. Although not significant, subgroup analysis demonstrated that this was more pronounced in the CP group. JP drain duration was decreased among all procedures for CP compared to FS. Conclusions The use of hemostatic agents in oncologic breast surgery may result in decreased postoperative complications and significantly reduce time to JP drain removal.

Background: Many breast-conserving surgical options exist for patients with breast cancer. Surgical choices can have lasting effects on a patient’s life, so patient satisfaction is important to assess. Patient-reported outcome measures provide important tools when evaluating surgical modalities. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how patients describe breast-conserving surgical choices in standard partial mastectomy and oncoplastic surgery options. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was performed in PubMed for studies discussing standard partial mastectomy or oncoplastic surgery and measurement of preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q or other validated patient-reported outcome measures. Oncoplastic surgery was categorized as volume displacement or volume replacement. Articles in languages other than English, not involving partial mastectomy or oncoplastic surgery, or not measuring patient-reported outcomes were excluded. Weighted proportions were generated and analyzed with a Welch t test. Results: Of 390 articles, 43 met inclusion criteria, and 8784 patients were included in a pooled database. Although standard partial mastectomy scored well, oncoplastic surgery performed significantly better than partial mastectomy in all postoperative BREAST-Q categories: satisfaction with breasts (74.3 versus 65.7), psychosocial well-being (81.3 versus 78.0), sexual well-being (61.6 versus 54.9), and satisfaction with outcome (85.4 versus 62.2). Level 2 volume displacement surgery had the most favorable scores. Conclusions: Breast-conserving surgical choices that include a variety of oncoplastic surgery and partial mastectomy methods all score well in patient-reported outcome measures, with oncoplastic surgery significantly preferred over partial mastectomy. Oncoplastic surgery should be considered in all cases, and the appropriate breast-conserving surgical choice should depend on the patient’s tumor presentation and anatomy.