No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Soundscapes have become recognized as an important natural resource. The traditional human-made versus natural soundscape comparison currently used in recreational resource management is challenged by borrowing soundscape components (i.e., biophony, anthmphony, geophony) from soundscape ecology. This article evaluated the soundscape preference o f birders. A three-component mode! o f recreational spe cialization was used to evaluate how recreationists differ in their preference fo r soundscape components. Data from in-person surveys collected at The Audubon Center and Sanctuary at Francis Beidler Forest in Harleyville, South Carolina were used in combination with surveys from online birding list ser\>ers to obtain a sample o f 415 individuals with varying levels o f specialization. The findings suggest soundscape preference exists as biophony, geophony, and anthrophony and that more specialized birders found geophony to be significantly more annoying than less specialized birders. Additionally, the skill and knowledge component o f specialization best explained the difference in geophony preference among birders.