As quoted in the letter by Hubert et al, 1 Owashi et al 3 recently proposed a very interesting mathematical model to derive with echocardiography specific LV pressure curves in patients with severe AS. Nevertheless, the proposed method also has some critical limitations: (1) it uses aortic valve area, among other parameters, to noninvasively predict the patient-specific LV pressure curve; however, calculation of aortic valve area with echocardiography has several known limitations 4 that can affect this estimation and critically influence the estimation of the LV pressure curve; (2) the method was derived from a small cohort of patients with moderate and severe AS from a single center and was not externally validated; (3) and finally, in the current form, the mathematical model is quite cumbersome to use in routine clinical practice and implement in any commercially available software. It would be important to validate the results by Owashi et al 3 in other groups of patients with severe AS.Importantly, another very recent publication by Jain et al 5 used the same method applied in our study 2 to derive LV MW indices in 35 patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this study, while LV GLS improved after TAVR (from À14% 6 4% to À15% 6 3%, P = .020), LV global work index decreased (from 1,856 6 705 mm Hg% to 1,535 6 385 mm Hg%, P < .001) and global work efficiency remained relatively stable (from 88.7% 6 11.9% to 89.9% 6 5.9%, P = .498). The differences in the trend of these parameters of LV function after TAVR highlight, as much as our study, 2 the importance of correcting for LV afterload when assessing the LV performance in patients with severe AS. Although our study and the study by Jain et al 5 provided encouraging results on the potential utility of the echocardiography-based calculation of LV MW indices in severe AS, further data would be needed to investigate their clinical value and particularly their role in risk stratification of patients with severe AS, compared with the parameters recommended by current guidelines.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.