No abstract

Objectives SLE is a severe autoimmune disease characterized by autoreactive B cells and IC formation, which causes systemic inflammation. B cell–targeted therapy could be a promising treatment strategy in SLE patients; nevertheless, randomized clinical trials have not always been successful. However, some groups have demonstrated beneficial effects in severe SLE patients with off-label rituximab (RTX) with belimumab (BLM), or bortezomib (BTZ), which targeted different B cells subsets. This study assembled sera from SLE cohorts treated with RTX+BLM (n = 15), BTZ (n = 11) and RTX (n = 16) to get an in-depth insight into the immunological effects of these therapies on autoantibodies and IC formation. Methods Autoantibodies relevant for IC formation and the avidity of anti-dsDNA were determined by ELISA. IC-mediated inflammation was studied by complement levels and ex vivo serum-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Results Reductions in autoantibodies were observed after all approaches, but the spectrum differed depending upon the treatment. Specifically, only RTX+BLM significantly decreased anti-C1q. Achieving seronegativity of ≥1 autoantibody, specifically anti-C1q, was associated with lower disease activity. In all SLE patients, the majority of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies had low avidity. RTX+BLM significantly reduced low-, medium- and high-avidity anti-dsDNA, while RTX and BTZ only significantly reduced medium avidity. IC-mediated inflammation, measured by C3 levels and neutrophil extracellular trap formation, improved after RTX+BLM and RTX but less after BTZ. Conclusion This study demonstrated the impact of different B cell–targeted strategies on autoantibodies and IC formation and their potential clinical relevance in SLE.

Background:Belimumab (BLM), a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against B-cell activating factor (BAFF), is the first approved biological agent for patients with active severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). There is clinical evidence that combining BLM with B cell depleting therapy can ameliorate disease activity in severe, refractory SLE patients1. Although BLM is a B cell directed therapy and has been shown to significantly decrease total B cells, flow cytometry observations suggest a rapid increase of circulating memory B cells (MBC)2.Objectives:To investigate dynamics of B-cell subsets in SLE patients treated with or without BLM, with a focus on assessing MBC characteristics.Methods:Extensive B cell subset phenotyping was performed by high-sensitivity (HS) flow cytometry (acquisition of 107 leukocytes; per EuroFlow protocols3) on samples from active LN or SLE patients with major organ involvement treated with standard of care (SOC) consisting of high dose steroids and mycophenolate mofetil combined with or without the addition of BLM. MBC gene expression profiles were characterized with single-cell RNA and V(D)J sequencing (ScRNA-SEQ).Results:By employing HS flowcytometry, we established that the absolute increase in circulating MBC in SLE and LN patients was significant for patients who initiated BLM (Figure 1). The increase was observed in a broad range of MBC subsets (Unswitched, IgG1+, IgG2+, IgA1+, IgA2+) at 2 and 4 weeks following initiation of BLM treatment. This rise in MBC could hypothetically be attributed to either proliferation of blood MBC, BLM induced migration of tissue-resident MBCs or BLM related retention of tissue-destined MBC in the blood. ScRNA-SEQ analysis of cell cycle gene-expression was performed and established in both groups a non-proliferating phenotype [in approximately ~94%] of MBC post-treatment, including absence of MKI67 as active proliferation marker. Clonal diversity analysis comparing week 2 with baseline revealed an unexpected decrease of the largest MBC clones in BLM, whereas no change in clonality was observed with SOC alone. Together these data indicate that proliferation is unlikely to be responsible for the observed increase in MBC by BLM. Furthermore, a clear difference was found in gene-expression levels between both treatment groups: BLM was responsible for the upregulation of 72 vs 10 genes in SOC, likewise 162 vs 32 genes were downregulated. Most importantly, a significant downregulation of the migration genes SELL (CD62L), CCR7, ITGB1, RAC2 and ICAM2, were specifically seen in BLM treated patients. This may reflect disrupted lymphocyte trafficking, preventing MBCs from transmigrating from the blood into tissue owing to reduced migration molecules, or preventing MBCs from being retained at the tissue level owing to reduction in tissue adhesion proteins.Conclusion:The addition of BLM to SOC significantly increases MBCs in patients with SLE independently of proliferation, accompanied by a strong modulation of gene expression, including reduced expression of migration markers pointing towards disrupted lymphocyte trafficking. These data may have important implications for improving treatment strategies in patients with LN or severe SLE, as a deeper depletion of autoreactive MBCs could be established by adding B-cell-depleting therapy after the initiation of BLM.Figure 1.Change in pre-germinal center and memory B cell counts from baseline to week 4 of patients with SLE or LN treated with SOC (n=8) or SOC+BLM (n=11).References:[1]Arends EJ et al. Long-term effects of combined B cell immunomodulation with rituximab and belimumab in severe, refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: 2-year results. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Jun 27 gfaa117.[2]Stohl W et al. Belimumab reduces autoantibodies, normalizes low complement levels, and reduces select B cell populations in patients with SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(7):2328-2337.[3]Blanco et al, Age-associated distribution of B and plasma cell subsets in peripheral blood - J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018 141 2208-2219.Disclosure of Interests:Eline J. Arends: None declared, Mihaela Zlei: None declared, Christopher M. Tipton: None declared, Zgjim Osmani: None declared, Sylvia Kamerling: None declared, Ton Rabelink: None declared, Ignacio Sanz: None declared, Jacques J.M. van Dongen Paid instructor for: BD Biosciences: Educational Services (fees for LUMC), Consultant of: BD Biosciences and Cytognos (fees for LUMC), Grant/research support from: GSK (flow cytometry studies for GSK BLISS-BELIEVE study NCT03312907), Cees van Kooten: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Consultant of: Aurinia provided financial compensation for consultancy, Grant/research support from: GSK provided belimumab for free for the Synbiose-2 clinical trial and provided an unrestricted grant to conduct the study.

Blood samples are frequently collected in human studies of the immune system but poorly represent tissue-resident immunity. Understanding the immunopathogenesis of tissue-restricted diseases, such as chronic hepatitis B, necessitates direct investigation of local immune responses. We developed a workflow that enables frequent, minimally invasive collection of liver fine-needle aspirates in multi-site international studies and centralized single-cell RNA sequencing data generation using the Seq-Well S3 picowell-based technology. All immunological cell types were captured, including liver macrophages, and showed distinct compartmentalization and transcriptional profiles, providing a systematic assessment of the capabilities and limitations of peripheral blood samples when investigating tissue-restricted diseases. The ability to electively sample the liver of chronic viral hepatitis patients and generate high-resolution data will enable multi-site clinical studies to power fundamental and therapeutic discovery.

Background and Aims: HBV infection is restricted to the liver, where it drives exhaustion of virus-specific T and B cells and pathogenesis through dysregulation of intrahepatic immunity. Our understanding of liver-specific events related to viral control and liver damage has relied almost solely on animal models, and we lack useable peripheral biomarkers to quantify intrahepatic immune activation beyond cytokine measurement. Our objective was to overcome the practical obstacles of liver sampling using fine-needle aspiration and develop an optimized workflow to comprehensively compare the blood and liver compartments within patients with chronic hepatitis B using single-cell RNA sequencing. Approach and Results: We developed a workflow that enabled multi-site international studies and centralized single-cell RNA sequencing. Blood and liver fine-needle aspirations were collected, and cellular and molecular captures were compared between the Seq-Well S3 picowell-based and the 10× Chromium reverse-emulsion droplet–based single-cell RNA sequencing technologies. Both technologies captured the cellular diversity of the liver, but Seq-Well S3 effectively captured neutrophils, which were absent in the 10× dataset. CD8 T cells and neutrophils displayed distinct transcriptional profiles between blood and liver. In addition, liver fine-needle aspirations captured a heterogeneous liver macrophage population. Comparison between untreated patients with chronic hepatitis B and patients treated with nucleoside analogs showed that myeloid cells were highly sensitive to environmental changes while lymphocytes displayed minimal differences. Conclusions: The ability to electively sample and intensively profile the immune landscape of the liver, and generate high-resolution data, will enable multi-site clinical studies to identify biomarkers for intrahepatic immune activity in HBV and beyond.