Purpose. In 1998, Digital Imaging Communications in Medicine (DICOM) proposed a calibration tool, the grayscale standard display function (GSDF), to obtain output consistency of radiographs. To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports of investigating the relation between perceptual linearity and detectability on a calibration curve. Materials and methods. To determine a suitable calibration curve for diagnostic liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors, the GSDF and Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) curves were compared using psychophysical gradient δ and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for clinical images. Results. We succeeded in expressing visually recognized contrast directly using δ instead of the just noticeable difference (JND) index of the DICOM standard. As a result, we found that the visually recognized contrast at low luminance areas on the LCD monitor calibrated by the CIE curve is higher than that calibrated by the GSDF curve. On the ROC analysis, there was no significant difference in tumor detectability between GSDF and CIE curves for clinical thoracic images. However, the area parameter Az of the CIE curve is superior to that of the GSDF curve. The detectability of tumor shadows in the thoracic region on clinical images using the CIE curve was superior to that using the GSDF curve owing to the high absolute value of δ in the low luminance range. Conclusion. We conclude that the CIE curve is the most suitable tool for calibrating diagnostic LCD monitors, rather than the GSDF curve.
The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) standard proposed the grey-scale standard display function (GSDF) as a calibration tool for making the gradation characteristic of a radiographic output image consistent. This is designed in such a manner that the contrast visually recognised by observers (called psychophysical contrast) becomes a constant for all digital driving levels. The DICOM standard calls such an ideal characteristic perceptual linearisation. The psychophysical gradient that can express the psychophysical contrast was introduced for the evaluation of the GSDF using a liquid crystal display monitor. Investigations regarding its ability to yield a constant psychophysical contrast, independent of the digital driving level change and under an actual observation environment, such as for clinical radiographic diagnosis in hospital, were carried out. The psychophysical gradients of the GSDF were obtained for two kinds of observation environment: one was a restricted environment such as in a dark room, under steady-state adaptation, using the sinusoidal grading pattern corresponding to the peak frequency of the human eye response. The other was an actual environment reflecting that encountered during clinical diagnosis in a hospital. As a result, the psychophysical gradient under the restricted environment became almost constant and independent of the change in digital driving level, i.e. perceptual linearisation could be satisfied. Furthermore, under the actual observation environment, the psychophysical gradient decreased gradually with the increase in digital driving level, i.e. the perceptual linearisation could not be satisfied. The percentage decrease in the value of the psychophysical gradient at the maximum luminance area was approximately 60% compared with that at the minimum luminance area. Accordingly, the GSDF is unsuitable as a calibration tool for the liquid crystal display monitor, which will be used in actual clinical diagnosis, as it cannot achieve 'perceptual linearisation' under the actual environment. For the purpose of clinical diagnosis, it is necessary to enlarge the physical gradient of GSDF further in the high digital driving level range (which relates to a high luminance area) to give an approximation that is as close to the idealised form as possible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.