Accumulating evidence indicates that circular RNAs (circR-NAs) are vital regulators of various biological functions involved in the progression of multiple cancers. Circular F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 (circFBXW7) (hsa_circ_0001451) has been reported to act as a tumor suppressor by encoding a novel protein in glioma; however, its functions and mechanisms in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remain elusive. In the current study, we validated by qRT-PCR that circFBXW7 was downregulated in TNBC cell lines and found that low expression of circFBXW7 was associated with poorer clinical outcomes. circFBXW7 expression was negatively correlated with tumor size and lymph node metastasis, and it was an independent prognostic factor for TNBC patients. We performed cell proliferation, colony formation, transwell, wound-healing, and mouse xenograft assays to confirm the functions of circFBXW7. Overexpression of circFBXW7 obviously inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and tumor growth in both in vitro and in vivo assays. Luciferase reporter assays and RNA immunoprecipitation assays revealed that circFBXW7 serves as a sponge of miR-197-3p and suppresses TNBC growth and metastasis by upregulating FBXW7 expression. In addition, the FBXW7-185aa protein encoded by circFBXW7 inhibited the proliferation and migration abilities of TNBC cells by increasing the abundance of FBXW7 and inducing c-Myc degradation. In summary, our research demonstrated that circFBXW7 sponges miR-197-3p and encodes the FBXW7-185aa protein to suppress TNBC progression through upregulating FBXW7 expression. Thus, circFBXW7 may act as a therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker for TNBC.

Currently, a new technology termed PROTAC, proteolysis targeting chimera, has been developed for inducing the protein degradation by a targeting molecule. This technology takes advantage of a moiety of targeted protein and a moiety of recognizing E3 ubiquitin ligase and produces a hybrid molecule to specifically knock down a targeted protein. During the first decade, three pedigreed groups worked on the development of this technology. To date, this technology has been extended by different groups, aiming to develop new drugs against different diseases including cancers. This review summarizes the contributions of the groups for the development of PROTAC. Significance of the study This review summarized the development of the PROTAC technology for readers and also presented the author's opinions on the application of the technology in tumor therapy.

BackgroundIt was unclear whether breast cancer subtypes are associated with the risk of site-specific metastases. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between molecular subtypes and distant metastatic sites and their prognostic significance.MethodsWe identified 295,213 patients with invasive breast cancer from 2010 to 2014 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Subtypes were classified into four categories: hormone receptor (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2−), HR+/HER2+, HR−/HER2+, and triple-negative (HR−/HER2−). Logistic regression was used to assess the association between metastasis location and subtypes. Multivariate Cox models were used to estimate the overall survival (OS) of related factors.ResultsAccording to our study, 3.28%, 1.52%, 1.20%, and 0.35% of newly diagnosed breast cancers presented bone, lung, liver, and brain metastases at diagnosis, respectively. Both metastatic sites and subtypes significantly affected the OS after metastasis. In multivariate analysis, HR+/HER2+ subtype (OR as compared with HR+/HER2− subtype, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.22–1.39]) significantly correlated with elevated bone metastasis risk, whereas HR−/HER2+ did not. Both HER2+ subtypes (HR+/HER2+ and HR−/HER2+) were significantly associated with higher rates of liver, brain, and lung metastases, while the highest OR was observed in liver metastases. Triple-negative tumors had a higher rate of brain (OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.61–2.35]), liver (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.20–1.51]), and lung metastases (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.21–1.47]), but a significantly lower rate of bone metastases (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.69]) than HR+/HER2−tumors.ConclusionsBreast cancer subtypes are associated with different metastatic patterns and confer different prognostic impacts. Molecular subtypes can identify patients at increased risk of site-specific metastases.

No abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown encouraging treatment efficacy for metastatic breast cancer in several clinical trials. However, response only occurred in a small population. Evidence predicting response and survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer following ICI treatment with existing biomarkers has not been well summarized. This review aimed to summarize the efficacy and predictive factors of immune checkpoint therapy in metastatic breast cancer, which is critical for clinical practice. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, www.clinicaltrials.gov , and meeting abstracts were comprehensively searched to identify clinical trials. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In this review, 27 studies with 1746 patients were included for quantitative synthesis. The pooled ORR was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 12–27%]. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients had a higher response rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.44, p = 0.01]. First-line immunotherapy had a better ORR than second-line immunotherapy (OR = 2.00, p = 0.02). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) ⩾5% (OR = 2.53, p = 0.002) and high infiltrated CD8+ T-cell level (OR = 4.33, p = 0.006) were ideal predictors of immune checkpoint therapy response. Liver metastasis indicated poor response (OR = 0.19, p = 0.009). However, the difference was non-significant in ORR based on age, performance status score, lymph node metastasis, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. In addition, the PD-L1-positive subgroup had a better 1-year PFS (OR = 1.55, p = 0.04) and 2-year OS (OR = 2.28, p = 0.02) following ICI treatment. The pooled incidence during ICI therapy of grade 3–4 trAEs was 25% (95% CI = 16–34%), whereas for grade 3–4 irAEs it was 15% (95% CI = 11–19%). Conclusions: Metastatic breast cancer had modest response to ICI therapy. PD-L1-positive, first-line immunotherapy, non-liver metastasis, and high TIL and CD8+ T-cell infiltrating levels could predict better response to ICI treatment. Patients with PD-L1-positive tumor could gain more survival benefits from immune checkpoint therapy.

The risk factors for morbidity and mortality in breast cancer lung metastases (BCLM) patients still remain poorly identified. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and survival of BCLM and associated risk factors. Patients with BCLM were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for BCLM. Predictors of factors associated with death were analyzed in Cox regression and Fine and Gray's test. Of the 11568 patients with stage IV breast cancer, 4213 (36.4%) had BCLM and 1214 (10.5%) had metastases confined to lungs. The median survival time for patients with BCLM was 21 months, and 15.5% of the patients were alive more than 3 years. The tumor subtype distribution was 45.3% HR−/HER2−, 12.2% HR+/HER2+, 7.8% HR−/HER2+, and 15.0% triple‐negative subtype. Compared with patients without BCLM, those with BCLM were more likely to be aged, female, black, higher tumor grade, HR−/HER2+, HR+/HER2+, and triple‐negative subtypes at diagnosis. Survival analysis showed that the aged, black race, HR−/HER2+, triple‐negative subtype, higher grade were the independent risk factor for BCLM patients’ survival, while HR+/HER2+ subtype, insured status, and married status suggested better prognosis. In conclusion, the incidence and prognosis of BCLM varied by tumor subtypes, age, and race. Elderly patients with HER2‐positive or triple‐negative tumors were more likely to have BCLM.

The interaction between hypoxia and immune status has been confirmed in various cancer settings, and corresponding treatments have been investigated. However, reliable biomarkers are needed for individual treatment, so we sought to develop a novel scoring system based on hypoxia and immune status. Prognostic hypoxia-immune status-related signatures of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (N = 158), Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) (N = 297), and GSE58812 (N = 107). LASSO Cox regression was used for model construction. Hypoxia and immune status expression profiles were analyzed, and infiltrating immune cells were compared. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used for validation in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) cohort, and immunofluorescence was applied for the detection of hypoxia and immune markers in cancer tissues. Ten cross-cohort prognostic hypoxia-immune signatures were included to construct the comprehensive index of hypoxia and immune (CIHI) in the METABRIC cohort. Two subgroups of patients with distinct hypoxia-immune status conditions were identified using CIHI: hypoxia high /immune low and hypoxia low /immune high , with a significantly better overall survival (OS) rate in the latter (P < 0.01). The prognostic value of CIHI was further validated in the TCGA, GSE58812, and SYSUCC cohorts (P < 0.01).

Distant metastasis remains the major cause of morbidity for breast cancer. Individuals with liver or brain metastasis have an extremely poor prognosis and low response rates to anti-PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint therapy compared to those with metastasis at other sites. Therefore, it is urgent to investigate the underlying mechanism of anti-PD-1/L1 resistance and develop more effective immunotherapy strategies for these patients. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, a high-resolution map of the entire tumor ecosystem based on 44 473 cells from breast cancer liver and brain metastases is depicted. Identified by canonical markers and confirmed by multiplex immunofluorescent staining, the metastatic ecosystem features remarkable reprogramming of immunosuppressive cells such as FOXP3+ regulatory T cells, LAMP3+ tolerogenic dendritic cells, CCL18+ M2-like macrophages, RGS5+ cancer-associated fibroblasts, and LGALS1+ microglial cells. In addition, PD-1 and PD-L1/2 are barely expressed in CD8+ T cells and cancer/immune/stromal cells, respectively. Interactions of the immune checkpoint molecules LAG3-LGALS3 and TIGIT-NECTIN2 between CD8+ T cells and cancer/immune/stromal cells are found to play dominant roles in the immune escape. In summary, this study dissects the intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment in liver and brain metastases of breast cancer for the first time, providing insights into the most appropriate immunotherapy strategies for these patients.