Objective
To assess the protective effect of depot‐medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on uterine leiomyomas. DMPA has been widely used in Thailand for many years; uterine leiomyomas is the most common female tumour.
Design
A multicentre hospital‐based case‐control study.
Setting
University and regional hospitals.
Patients
Cases were all newly diagnosed patients with pathologically proven diagnosis of uterine leiomyomas, who were admitted to eight hospitals in three regions of Thailand from January 1991; to June 1993;. Three controls matched with cases by sex, age within five years and date of admission within three months were recruited.
Main outcome measures
Information on socio‐demographic factors, personal and family history, current disease, reproductive and contraceptive history was collected from cases and controls by interview.
Results
There were 910 cases and 2709; controls. After univariate and unconditional multiple logistic regression analysis, risk factors associated positively with uterine leiomyomas are tubal ligation, family history of uterine leiomyomas, higher education, obesity and abortion. In contrast, DMPA, use of oral contraceptives, higher parity and smoking are associated with a lower relative risk suggesting that they have a protective effect against uterine leiomyomas. This causative relation is further strengthened by the strong duration‐response relation between DMPA and uterine leiomyomas. This protection may persist for more than 10 years after the last dose.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated a strong, duration dependent protective effect of DMPA against uterine leiomyomas.
This study supports the association between sexual behaviors and the incident BV. Failure to detect an association between intravaginal practices and incident BV warrants further studies in high-risk populations or in women with a higher prevalence of intravaginal practices.
Evidence from this review indicates that the rate of initiation of contraceptive implant at the first postpartum check-up visit was higher with immediate postpartum insertion than with delayed insertion. There appeared to be little or no difference between the groups in the continuation rate of contraceptive implant use at 6 months. It was unclear whether there was any difference between the groups in continuation of contraceptive use at 12 months or in the unintended pregnancy rate at 12 months.
ObjectiveUnplanned pregnancy in women with SLE can have grave complications both for the child and the woman. We studied the prevalence of contraceptive counseling among women of reproductive age with SLE at a university hospital in Northeast Thailand.MethodsRecruited: 125 women with SLE, between 15 and 50 years, followed up at the Rheumatology Clinic. A questionnaire was administered and the results analyzed to identify the prevalence of contraceptive counseling.ResultsThe majority of women with SLE had had their reproductive goals evaluated (76.00%, 95% CI 66–83) and received contraceptive counseling (72%). Among the SLE patients at risk for pregnancy, only one-third used effective contraception and one-fifth of those did not have any background knowledge about SLE and pregnancy. Contraceptive counseling was more frequently given to women who had had a previous pregnancy or who were already concerned about SLE as related to pregnancy.ConclusionThe majority of SLE patients had at one time or other received contraceptive counseling, but some reported not grasping the gravity. The survey results presented herein suggest that a multidisciplinary team is needed to improve patient knowledge regarding SLE as it affects on pregnancy and relatedly contraceptive counseling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.