Dying at home may contribute to achieving good death in terminally ill patients with cancer without causing remarkably increased caregiver burden. Place of death should be regarded as an essential goal in end-of-life care.

No abstract

A new scale that evaluates sense of security with regard to cancer care was developed. Future studies should examine whether establishing a regional health care system that provides quality palliative care could improve the sense of security of the general population.

Dying at a favorite place is one of the important determinants for terminally ill cancer patients. The primary aim was to clarify (1) differences in preferred place of care and place of death among the general public across four areas across Japan and (2) preferred place of care and place of death among community-representative cancer patients. A cross-sectional mail survey was conducted on 8,000 randomly selected general population. We examined preferred place of care and place of death using two vignettes and obtained a total of 3,984 (50%) responses. For the pain scenario, approximately 50% of the general public throughout four areas chose home as their preferred place of care; and for the dependent-without-pain scenario, about 40% chose home as preferred place of care. In cancer patients, for both scenarios, approximately 40% chose home as the preferred place of care, and they were significantly less likely to choose home. The most preferred combination of place of care and place of death was home hospice for both groups. Although there were statistically significant differences in preferred place of care and place of death among the four regions, the absolute difference was less than 8%. Independent determinants of choosing home as place of care included concern about family burden and being unable to adequately respond to sudden changes out of working hours. In conclusion, establishing more accessible home and hospice service is strongly required through arranging regional resources to reduce family burden, alleviating patient-perceived burdens, and improving 24-h support at home.

Substantial increase in amantadine-resistant influenza A (H3N2) was reported in Asia and North America in 2005. In this study the frequency and genetic characteristics of amantadine-resistant influenza A, circulated in Japan in 2005-2006 season, were investigated. Isolates were tested by amantadine susceptibility test (TCID(50)/0.2 ml method), and sequencing of the M2 gene to identify mutations that confer resistance. Additionally, the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes of the viruses were examined. In total, 415 influenza A isolates from six prefectures were screened, and 231 (65.3%) of 354 influenza A (H3N2) were amantadine-resistant, with a serine to asparagine (S31N) change in the M2 gene. However, none of 61 A (H1N1) isolates were resistant. In addition, genetic analyses of the HA gene showed all amantadine-resistant viruses clustered in one (named clade N), possessing specific double mutations at 193, serine to phenylalanine (S193F), and at 225, asparatic acid to asparagine (D225N), and sensitive viruses belonged to another group (clade S). The clinical presentations at the clinical visit did not differ between patients shedding clade N virus and those shedding clade S virus. None of the patients had received previous treatment with amantadine. The results indicate an unusually high prevalence and wide circulation of the amantadine-resistance influenza A (H3N2) in Japan in the 2005-2006 season. These strains had the characteristic double mutations in the HA, in addition to the M2 mutation responsive for resistance. Antiviral resistance monitoring should be intensified and maintained for rapid feedback into treatment strategies, and selection of alternative therapeutic agents.

Our findings indicate that providing palliative care information via small media and lectures in the community is effective in improving perceptions of palliative care and knowledge about opioids among the community dwellers, especially for caregivers of the patients. The acquisition of adequate knowledge about palliative care from various information sources may improve people's sense of security regarding cancer.

Advanced cancer patients frequently had incorrect knowledge about opioids, a belief that palliative care is only for terminally ill patients, and concerns about homecare, especially the family burden and responses to sudden changes. Providing appropriate information about the safety of opioids, the availability of palliative care during the entire course of the disease, and realistic information about homecare is of marked importance to promote patients' sense of security.

A considerable number of outpatients with metastatic or recurrent cancer experienced pain, physical symptoms, emotional distress, and existential suffering, and advocated improvements in palliative care across multiple areas.