The pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis is an excellent model system in which to study the neuronal and molecular substrates of associative learning and its consolidation into long-term memory. Until now, the presence of cyclic AMP (cAMP)-responsive element binding protein (CREB), which is believed to be a necessary component in the process of a learned behavior that is consolidated into long-term memory, has only been assumed in Lymnaea neurons. We therefore cloned and analyzed the cDNA sequences of homologues of CREB1 and CREB2 and determined the presence of these mRNAs in identifiable neurons of the central nervous system (CNS) of L. stagnalis. The deduced amino acid sequence of Lymnaea CREB1 is homologous to transcriptional activators, mammalian CREB1 and Aplysia CREB1a, in the C-terminal DNA binding (bZIP) and phosphorylation domains, whereas the deduced amino acid sequence of Lymnaea CREB2 is homologous to transcriptional repressors, human CREB2, mouse activating transcription factor-4, and Aplysia CREB2 in the bZIP domain. In situ hybridization revealed that only a relatively few neurons showed strongly positive signals for Lymnaea CREB1 mRNA, whereas all the neurons in the CNS contained Lymnaea CREB2 mRNA. Using one of the neurons (the cerebral giant cell) containing Lymnaea CREB1 mRNA, we showed that the injection of a CRE oligonucleotide inhibited a cAMP-induced, long-lasting synaptic plasticity. We therefore conclude that CREBs are present in Lymnaea neurons and may function as necessary players in behavioral plasticity.

No abstract

No abstract

The pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis is capable of learning taste aversion and consolidating this learning into long-term memory (LTM) that is called conditioned taste aversion (CTA). Previous studies showed that some molluscan insulin-related peptides (MIPs) were upregulated in snails exhibiting CTA. We thus hypothesized that MIPs play an important role in neurons underlying the CTA-LTM consolidation process. To examine this hypothesis, we first observed the distribution of MIP II, a major peptide of MIPs, and MIP receptor and determined the amounts of their mRNAs in the CNS. MIP II was only observed in the light green cells in the cerebral ganglia, but the MIP receptor was distributed throughout the entire CNS, including the buccal ganglia. Next, when we applied exogenous mammalian insulin, secretions from MIP-containing cells or partially purified MIPs, to the isolated CNS, we observed a long-term change in synaptic efficacy (i.e., enhancement) of the synaptic connection between the cerebral giant cell (a key interneuron for CTA) and the B1 motor neuron (a buccal motor neuron). This synaptic enhancement was blocked by application of an insulin receptor antibody to the isolated CNS. Finally, injection of the insulin receptor antibody into the snail before CTA training, while not blocking the acquisition of taste aversion learning, blocked the memory consolidation process; thus, LTM was not observed. These data suggest that MIPs trigger changes in synaptic connectivity that may be correlated with the consolidation of taste aversion learning into CTA-LTM in the Lymnaea CNS. IntroductionFormation of long-term memory (LTM) after associative learning is dependent on both protein synthesis and altered gene activity in neurons that play a critical role in memory formation (Inda et al., 2005;Lee et al., 2008;Rosenegger et al., 2010). The pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis is a good model in which to elucidate the causal mechanisms that underlie LTM formation (Ito et al., 1999(Ito et al., , 2012a Sakakibara, 2006;Nikitin et al., 2008;Kemenes and Benjamin, 2009). In conditioned taste aversion (CTA), a form of associative learning, an appetitive stimulus (sucrose) is used as the conditioned stimulus (CS), and an aversive stimulus (KCl) is used as the unconditioned stimulus (US). The CS increases the feeding response in snails, whereas the US inhibits feeding. In CTA training, the CS is paired with the US. After repeated paired presentations, the CS no longer elicits the feeding response, and this aversive conditioning persists as LTM (Kojima et al., 1996).We identified candidate genes necessary for the establishment of CTA-LTM in Lymnaea and found that some genes were upregulated while others were downregulated . Some of the upregulated genes after LTM consolidation were the molluscan insulin-related peptide (MIP I, II, and others) genes. However, it is unclear whether MIPs are necessary for memory consolidation, and if they are, what is their role in the consolidation process.Peptide purification of MIP I-III and V and the additi...

In the majority of studies designed to elucidate the causal mechanisms of memory formation, certain members of the experimental cohort, even though subjected to exactly the same conditioning procedures, remember significantly better than others, whereas others show little or no long-term memory (LTM) formation. To begin to address the question of why this phenomenon occurs and thereby help clarify the causal mechanism of LTM formation, we used a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure on individuals of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis and analyzed their subsequent behavior. Using sucrose as an appetitive stimulus and KCl as an aversive stimulus, we obtained a constant ratio of 'poor' to 'good' performers for CTA-LTM. We found that approximately 40% of trained snails possessed LTM following a one-trial conditioning procedure. When we examined the timewindow necessary for the memory consolidation, we found that if we cooled snails to 4°C for 30·min within 10·min after the one-trial conditioning, LTM was blocked. However, with delayed cooling (i.e. longer than 10·min), LTM was present. We could further interfere with LTM formation by inducing inhibitory learning (i.e. backward conditioning) after the one-trial conditioning. Finally, we examined whether we could motivate snails to acquire LTM by depriving them of food for 5·days before the onetrial conditioning. Food-deprived snails, however, failed to exhibit LTM following the one-trial conditioning. These results will help us begin to clarify why some individuals are better at learning and forming memory for specific tasks at the neuronal level.

No abstract

The pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis is capable of learning conditioned taste aversion (CTA) and then consolidating that learning into long-term memory (LTM) that persists for at least 1 month. LTM requires de novo protein synthesis and altered gene activity. Changes in gene activity in Lymnaea that are correlated with, much less causative, memory formation have not yet been identified. As a first step toward rectifying this situation, we constructed a cDNA microarray with mRNAs extracted from the central nervous system (CNS) of Lymnaea. We then, using this microarray assay, identified genes whose activity either increased or decreased following CTA memory consolidation. We also identified genes whose expression levels were altered after inhibition of the cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) that is hypothesized to be a key transcription factor for CTA memory. We found that the molluscan insulin-related peptide II (MIP II) was up-regulated during CTA-LTM, whereas the gene encoding pedal peptide preprohormone (Pep) was down-regulated by CREB2 RNA interference. We next examined mRNAs of MIP II and Pep using real-time RT-PCR with SYBR Green. The MIP II mRNA level in the CNS of snails exhibiting "good" memory for CTA was confirmed to be significantly higher than that from the CNS of snails exhibiting "poor" memory. In contrast, there was no significant difference in expression levels of the Pep mRNA between "good" and "poor" performers. These data suggest that in Lymnaea MIP II may play a role in the consolidation process that forms LTM following CTA training.

Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in the pond snailLymnaea stagnalis has been widely used as a model for gaining an understanding of the molecular and behavioral mechanisms underlying learning and memory. At the behavioral level, however, it is still unclear how taste discrimination and CTA interact. We thus examined how CTA to one taste affected the feeding response induced by another appetitive food stimulus. We first demonstrated that snails have the capacity to recognize sucrose and carrot juice as distinct appetitive stimuli. We then found that snails can become conditioned (i.e. CTA) to avoid one of the stimuli and not the other. These results show that snails can distinguish between appetitive stimuli during CTA, suggesting that taste discrimination is processed upstream of the site where memory consolidation in the snail brain occurs. Moreover, we examined second-order conditioning with two appetitive stimuli and one aversive stimulus. Snails acquired second-order conditioning and were still able to distinguish between the different stimuli. Finally, we repeatedly presented the conditional stimulus alone to the conditioned snails, but this procedure did not extinguish the long-term memory of CTA in the snails. Taken together, our data suggest that CTA causes specific, irreversible and rigid changes from appetitive stimuli to aversive ones in the conditioning procedure.