O patrimônio cultural é alvo de diversos instrumentos jurídicos que buscam sua preservação e promoção. Além da desapropriação, vigilância, registro, apresentamse o tombamento e o inventário como ferramentas comumente utilizadas para atingir esses fins, além de outras formas de acautelamento. Porém, o inventário não possui uma regulamentação infraconstitucional federal como os demais dispositivos. Para tanto, municípios e estados buscam suprimir tal lacuna, exercendo seus respectivos poderes de legislar. Contudo, tem sido atribuído ao inventário efeitos típicos e restritos ao tombamento. Este artigo pretende apresentar essa celeuma, bem como expor posições distintas acerca do inventário como utensílio jurídico, de conhecimento e/ou de preservação, do patrimônio cultural no Brasil.Palavras-chave: Patrimônio Cultural. Inventário de conhecimento. Inventário de preservação.
The inventory as a tool for cultural heritage preservation: adaptations and uses (un) characterizing its purpose.Cultural heritage is the subject of several legal instruments that seek its preservation and promotion. Beyond expropriation, monitoring, logging, we present the inventory and the declaration of cultural interest as tools commonly used to achieve these ends, and other forms of precaution. However, the inventory does not have an infra federal regulations as other devices. Therefore, states and municipalities seek to suppress such a gap, exercising their respective powers to legislate. However, it has been assigned to inventory effects and typical restricted to tipping. This article intends to present this stir and expose different positions on the inventory as utensil legal (for knowledge and / or preservation) of cultural heritage in Brazil.
The research is a brief analysis of recent legislation in Argentina about the intangible heritage and its relationship with Brazilian instruments. This is a study about links between the two laws and their touch points and their differences. It will be seen that the legislative actions follow a common sense but are targeted for different acts of management of cultural heritage. We will be able to observe how legislation, whether it is Argentine or Brazilian, works as a mediator between the reclaiming of heritage (as in the cknowledgement of cultu al practices) and the government actions towards cultural heritage. This shows that Argentina, despite not creating specific federal legislation regarding intangible cultural heritage, is aware of t e need to preserve the cultural events that belong in this category of heritage.
Objective: The indication of the places of memory of the military dictatorship in Brazil is still incipient in this country. Thus, this work intends to indicate such places in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, protagonist of the 1964 coup to democracy, not only because General Mourão Filho’s troops were stationed there a materialization of what was already planned in the barracks; but because it was the headquarters of the Military Region, where its audit collected hearings from witnesses and organized trials, and civilian and military facilities were used as spaces for torture and serving sentences. Methodology: Through concepts such as “dark heritage” and “places of sensitive memory”, we will try to demonstrate how silencing is preponderant in local public policies, whether in the non-identification of these places, or in the listing processes that privilege aesthetic and stylistic aspects to the detriment of memories of the dictatorship. Originality: Since the places discussed in this article are not object of public policies in favour of collective memory, this work will indicate buildings that were places of State violence and generally go unnoticed in the city’s landscape. Conclusions: The erasure of the dictatorial past in Juiz de Fora, and in Brazil in general, is a strategy of covering up responsibilities.
A relação estabelecida entre o exercício constituinte, tão caro à modernidade, a relevância da Constituição para o Estado Nacional e a formatação de uma identidade social erigida pelo patrimônio cultural é o objeto primeiro desse artigo. Compreender os meandros e as imbricações entre essas categorias basilares dos Estados Nacionais é a finalidade precípua.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.