This research is motivated by the phenomenon of character and morals of elementary school students who are increasingly being degraded after the COVID-19 pandemic. Distance learning is the main trigger that causes students to become more passive in interacting with the surrounding environment. The main objective of this research is to find a new paradigm in post-COVID-19 learning that is able to improve the character of elementary school students after distance learning. The specific objectives of this study are 1) to analyze the effect of the Value Clarification Technique (VCT) learning model on the character of elementary school students; 2) Analyzing the differences in the character of students based on the level of national insight; and 3) Analyzing the interaction between the VCT learning model and national insight in influencing students' character. This research was conducted at SDN PAB 16 Klambir V, Hamparan Perak District. The research instrument uses a national insight test and a student character score questionnaire that has been validated by experts. The data analysis technique used Two Way Anova. The results showed that 1) the use of the Value Clarification Technique (VCT) learning model had a positive effect on increasing student character values after the COVID-19 pandemic; 2) The character of students with high national insight is better than the character of students with low national insight; and 3) There is an interaction between the Value Clarification Technique (VCT) learning model and national insight in influencing the character of elementary school students after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Based on the results of the analysis of previous studies, it shows that learning styles affect student learning outcomes, as well as thinking styles. However, there is no data which dominantly affects learning outcomes, learning styles or thinking styles. Through this study will be studied the influence of learning styles on learning outcomes and thinking styles on learning outcomes. Besides, it also examines the styles of learning styles and thinking styles that most dominantly affect learning outcomes. This research uses a quantitative approach, survey methods and descriptive techniques. The target population is all high school students in the city of Banda Aceh, while the sample is 90 grade 2 students at State Senior High School 5 Banda Aceh. Data analysis used descriptive and inferential statistical tests with the Two-Way ANOVA technique. The results of the analysis show that there is a significant difference between the impact of learning styles and thinking styles on student learning outcomes taught by the Discovery Learning model. In addition, it was also found that visual, auditory and kinaesthetic learning styles predominantly affect learning outcomes compared to visual styles. As for the thinking style, it is found that the style of concrete sequential thinking style is more dominant in influencing learning outcomes compared to other styles of thinking style.
The problem in this research is the low social studies learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to improve the social studies learning outcomes of the fourth grade students of SDN 006 Sencano Jaya, by applying the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) type of cooperative learning model. The hypothesis in this study is that if the cooperative learning model (STAD) is applied, it can improve the social studies learning outcomes of students of SDN 006 Sencano Jaya class. The results showed that the teacher activity in the first cycle of the first meeting showed an average of 70.83%, in the first cycle of the second meeting an average of 83.33%. In the second cycle, the first meeting was 87.50%, in the second cycle the second meeting had an average of 95.83%. Teacher activity in this study increased. Student activity in the first cycle of the first meeting with an average of 58.33% in the first cycle of the second meeting was 70.83%, in the second cycle of the first meeting an average of 75.00% in the second cycle of the second meeting with an average of 91.66%. Student activity in this study also increased. The initial data of social studies learning results showed that only 11 students completed with a percentage of 40.74% who did not complete 16 people or 59.25% of students who obtained a basic score above the minimum completeness criteria standard (KKM). In the UH I who completed 15 people or the percentage of 55.55% who did not complete 12 people with a percentage of 44.41%. At UH II, 24 people or 88.88% who did not complete were only 3 students or with a percentage of 11.11%. Social studies learning outcomes in this study are increasing, so with the application of the Cooperative learning model type Students Teams Achievement Division (STAD).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.