OBJECTIVES We aimed to develop a malignancy risk score model for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) using the demographic, radiological and clinical characteristics of patients in our centre. The model was then internally validated for malignancy risk estimation. METHODS A total of 270 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for SPN between June 2017 and May 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, cut-off values were determined for radiological tumour diameter, maximum standardized uptake value and the Brock University probability of malignancy (BU-PM) model. The Yedikule-SPN malignancy risk model was developed using these cut-off values and demographic, radiological and clinical criteria in the first 180 patients (study cohort) and internally validated with the next 90 patients (validation cohort). The Yedikule-SPN model was then compared with the BU-PM model in terms of malignancy prediction. RESULTS Malignancy was reported in 171 patients (63.3%). Maximum standardized uptake value and BU-PM scores were sufficient to predict malignancy (P < 0.001 for both), while the effectiveness of nodule size determined on thoracic computed tomography did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09). When the Yedikule-SPN model developed with the study cohort was applied to the validation cohort, it significantly predicted malignancy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.883, 95% confidence interval: 0.827–0.957, P < 0.001). Comparison of patients in the validation group with Yedikule-SPN scores above (n = 53) and below (n = 37) the cut-off value of 65.75 showed that the malignancy rate was significantly higher among patients with Yedikule-SPN score over 65.75 (86.8% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001, odds ratio = 23.821, 95% confidence interval: 7.805–72.701). When compared with the BU-PM model in all patients, the Yedikule-SPN model tended to be a better predictor of malignancy (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS The internally validated Yedikule-SPN model is also a good predictor of the malignancy of SPN(s). Prospective and multicentre external validation studies with large patients’ cohorts are needed.

Objectives We aimed to compare the currently used nodal staging system (pN) with the number of metastatic lymph node (LN) stations (sN) and the number of metastatic LNs (nN) on survival in patients with NSCLC. Methods Between 2010 and 2017, 1038 patients resected for NSCLC were analyzed. We performed three-different stratifications of LN status assessment: pN-category (pN0, pN1 and pN2); sN-category (sN0, sN1; one station metastasis, sN2; two-three stations metastases, and sN3; ≥ 4 stations metastasis); nN-category (nN0, nN1; one-three LNs metastasis, nN2; four-six Lns metastasis, and nN3; ≥ 7 LNs metastasis). Results Five-year survival rate was 70.1% for N0 in all classifications. It was 54.3% for pN1, and 26.4% for pN2 (p < 0.0001). Five-year survival rates for N1, N2, and N3 categories were 54.1%, 42.4% and 16.1% according to sN, and 51.4%, 36.1%, and 7.9% according to nN, respectively (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, sN and nN were independent risk factors such as pN (p < 0.0001). Hazard ratios versus N0 for N1, N2, and N3 were more significant for sN and nN than pN (1.597, 2.176, and, 3.883 for sN, 1.645, 2.658, and, 4.118 for nN, and 1.576, 3.222 for pN, respectively). When the subcategories of sN and nN were divided into pN1 and pN2 subgroups, the anatomic location of the LN involvement lost importance as tumor burden and tumor spreading increased. Conclusion The number of metastatic LN stations and the number of metastatic LNs are better prognostic factors than currently used nodal classification in NSCLC.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of the transition from the 6th edition of the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system to the 7th edition, and from the 7th edition to the 8th edition by comparing the stage migrations. We also aimed to externally validate the 8th edition of the TNM staging system. Methods: Between September 2005 and June 2015, a total of 1,077 patients (986 males, 91 females; mean age: 59.6±8.3 years; range, 35 to 84 years) with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resection were retrospectively analyzed. We re-staged patients according to 6th, 7th, and 8th TNM staging and compared the stage migrations of cases among the three staging systems. Results: Stage migration in the transition to the 7th edition of the TNM staging system was observed in 368 (34.1%) patients whereas it was observed in 541 (50.2%) patients in the transition to the 8th edition (p<0.001). The rate of upstaging in transition to the 7th edition staging system was 50.2% (n=185), whereas it was 98.1% (n=531) for the transition to the 8th edition (p<0.001). The survival rates of Stages 1B, 2B and 3A increased with transition to the 7th edition and the survival rates of Stages 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B increased with the transition to the 8th edition. The best stratification in the survival curves in the 6th edition was between 1B-1A and 3B-3A. In the 7th edition, it occurred between 1B-1A, 3A-2B and 3B-3A and, in the 8th edition, between 1B-1A and 3B-3A. Conclusion: Stratification according to the 7th edition showed better prognostic validity compared to the 6th edition; and that of the 8th edition was better compared to the 7th edition.