An expanding “gig” economy has changed the nature of employment; thus, researchers have recently focused on exploring the role of job precariousness in the workplace. However, little research attention has been given to understanding why, how and when job precariousness leads to employees’ negative behavioral outcomes in the service-oriented industry. In the current study, we examined job insecurity as a mediator and employees’ negative affect as a moderator in the relationship between job precariousness and employees’ withdrawal behavior. Using a sample of 472 employees working in Chinese hotels, we found that job precariousness is positively related to employees’ withdrawal behavior by increasing their job insecurity. Moreover, this mediating relationship is conditional on the moderator variable of employees’ negative affect for the path from job insecurity to withdrawal behavior. The importance of these findings for understanding the undesirable behavior outcomes of job precariousness is discussed.

No abstract

Although scholars and practitioners have highlighted the significance of students’ attitudes for their future employment, few empirical examinations have attempted to determine the potential association between students’ future orientation and their perceived employability. Thus, drawing on career construction theory, we test the positive effect of students’ future orientation on their perceived employability by exploring the mediator of problem-based learning and the moderators of job market knowledge and proactive personality. Collecting our data via a time-lagged design (N = 368), we have found that the positive association between future orientation and employability is mediated by problem-based learning. Our moderation analyses further revealed that job market knowledge positively moderates the relationship between future orientation and problem-based learning and that students’ proactive personality positively moderates the relationship between problem-based learning and perceived employability.

No abstract

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness of exposure and response prevention (ERP) combined with medication on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched to include randomized controlled trials of ERP combined with medication for OCD that met the criteria. The Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale was used as the primary outcome indicator, and Depression scales were used as secondary outcome indicators. An evaluation of bias risk was conducted to identify possible sources of bias based on methodological and clinical factors. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0 software was used to perform meta-analysis of the extracted data.ResultsA total of 21 studies with 1113 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that ERP combined with medication therapy was significantly better than medication therapy alone including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine and risperidone (MD = –6.60, 95% CI: –8.35 to –4.84, P < 0.00001), but D-cycloserine (DCS) drugs do not enhance the effect of ERP intervention in patients with OCD (MD = 0.15, 95% CI: –0.87 to 1.17, P = 0.77). There is more significant maintenance by combined treatment method of medication plus ERP than medication treatment alone during the follow-up period (MD = –7.14, 95% CI: –9.17 to –5.10, P < 0.00001). DCS drugs did not enhance the effect of ERP intervention on depression in patients with OCD (SMD = –0.08, 95% CI: –0.31 to 0.15, P = 0.50). ERP combined with drug improved patients’ depression levels significantly better than providing drug alone (SMD = –0.40, 95% CI: –0.68 to –0.11, P = 0.006).ConclusionPatients with OCD have significant improvement in symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression when ERP is combined with medication, however, not enough to prove that DCS can enhance ERP effectiveness.