The structural basis for sex differences in femoral neck (FN) fragility was studied in 1196 subjects and 307 patients with hip fracture. The absolute and relative patterns of modeling and remodeling on the periosteal and endocortical envelopes during growth and aging produce changes in FN geometry and structure that results in FN fragility in both sexes and sexual dimorphism in hip fracture risk in old age.Introduction: Femoral neck (FN) fragility in old age is usually attributed to age-related bone loss, while the sex differences in hip fracture rate are attributed to less bone loss in men than in women. The purpose of this study was to define the structural and biomechanical basis underlying the increase in FN fragility in elderly men and women and the structural basis of sex differences in hip fracture incidence in old age. Materials and Methods:We measured FN dimensions and areal bone mineral density in 1196 healthy subjects (801 females) 18 -92 years of age and 307 patients (180 females) with hip fracture using DXA. We then used the DXA-derived FN areal bone mineral density (BMD) and measured periosteal diameter to estimate endocortical diameter, cortical thickness, section modulus (a measure of bending strength), and buckling ratio (indices for structural stability). Results: Neither FN cortical thickness nor volumetric density differed in young adult women and men after height and weight adjustment. The sex differences in geometry were confined to the further displacement of the cortex from the FN neutral axis in young men, which produced 13.4% greater bending strength than in young women. Aging amplified this geometric difference; widening of the periosteal and endocortical diameters continued in both sexes but was greater in men, shifting the cortex even further from the neutral axis maintaining bending strength in men, not in women. In both sexes, less age-related periosteal than endocortical widening produced cortical thinning increasing the risk for structural failure by local buckling of the enlarged thin walled FN. Relative to age-matched controls, women and men with hip fractures had reduced cortical thickness, but FN periosteal diameter was increased in women and reduced in men, differences are likely to be originated in growth. Conclusions: The absolute and relative patterns of modeling and remodeling on the periosteal and endocortical envelopes during growth and aging produce changes in FN diameters, cortical thickness, and geometry that results in FN fragility in both sexes and sexual dimorphism in hip fracture risk in old age.

The aim of this study was to quantify the biomechanical basis for vertebral fracture risk in elderly men and women. A bone is likely to fracture when the loads imposed are similar to or greater than its strength. To quantify this risk, we developed a fracture risk index (FRI) based on the ratio of the vertebral body compressive load and strength. Loads were determined by upper body weight, height, and the muscle moment arm, and strength was estimated from cross-sectional area (CSA) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD). With loads less than the strength of the bone, the FRI remains <1. For any given load, once bone strength diminishes due to a falling vBMD, the FRI will increase. Should FRI approach or exceed unity, structural failure of the vertebra is likely. We measured vertebral body CSA vBMD of the middle zone of third lumbar vertebra by lateral and posteroanterior (PA) scanning using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and calculated vertebral compressive stress (load per unit area) in 327 healthy men and 686 healthy women and 26 men and 55 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures. Activities that require forward bending of the upper body caused ϳ10-fold more compressive stress on the vertebra compared with standing upright. Men and women had similar peak vBMD in young adulthood. Because men have greater stature than women, the loads imposed on the vertebral body are higher (3754 ؎ 65 N vs. 3051 ؎ 31 N; p < 0.001). However, because CSA also was higher in men than women, peak load per unit CSA (stress) did not differ by gender (317.4 ؎ 4.7 N/cm 2 vs. 321.9 ؎ 3.3 N/cm 2 , NS). The FRI was similar in young men and women and well below unity (0.42 ؎ 0.02 vs. 0.43 ؎ 0.01; NS). Gender differences emerged during aging; CSA increased in both men and women but more so in men, so load per unit area (stress) diminished but more so in men than in women. vBMD decreased in both genders but less so in men. These changes were captured in the FRI, which increased by only 21% in men and by 102% in women so that only 9% of elderly men but 26% of elderly women had an FRI > 1. Men and women with vertebral fractures had an FRI that was greater than or equal to unity (1.03 ؎ 0.13 vs. 1.35 ؎ 0.13; p < 0.05) and was 2.04 SD and 2.26 SD higher than age-matched men and women, respectively. In summary and conclusion, young men and women have a similar vBMD, vertebral stress, and FRI. During aging, CSA increases more, and vBMD decreases less in men than in women. Thus, fewer men than women are at risk for fracture because fewer men than women have these structural determinants of bone strength below a level at which the loads exceed the bone's ability to tolerate them. Men and women with vertebral fractures have FRIs that are equal to or exceed unity. The results show that a fracture threshold for vertebrae can be defined using established biomechanical principles; whether this approach has greater sensitivity and specificity than the current BMD T score of ؊2.

Spine fractures usually occur less commonly in men than in women. To identify the structural basis for this gender difference in vertebral fragility, we studied 1013 healthy subjects (327 men and 686 women) and 76 patients with spine fractures (26 men and 50 women). Bone mineral content (BMC), cross-sectional area (CSA), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the third lum-bar vertebral body (L3) were measured by posteroanterior (PA) and lateral scanning using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this cross-sectional study, the diminution in peak vertebral body BMC from young adulthood to old age was less in men than in women (6% vs. 27%). This diminution was the net result of two opposing changes occurring concurrently throughout adult life: the removal of bone adjacent to marrow on the inner (endosteal) surface by bone resorption and the deposition of bone on the outer (periosteal) surface by bone formation. For L3, we estimated that men resorbed 3.7 g and deposited 3.1 g, producing a net loss of 0.6 g from young adulthood to old age and women resorbed 3.1 g and deposited only 1.2 g, producing a net loss of 1.9 g. Thus, based on our indirect estimates of periosteal gain and endosteal loss across life, the observed net diminution in BMC during aging was less in men than women because absolute periosteal bone formation was greater in men than women (3.1 g vs. 1.2 g) not because absolute bone resorption was less in men. On the contrary, the absolute amount of bone resorbed was greater in men than women (3.7 g vs. 3.1 g). Periosteal bone formation also increased vertebral body CSA 3-fold more in men than in women, distributing loads onto a larger CSA, so that the load imposed per unit CSA decreased twice as much in men than in women (13% vs. 5%). In men and women with spine fractures, CSA and vBMD were reduced relative to age-matched controls. However, vBMD was no different to the adjusted vBMD in age-matched controls derived assuming controls had no periosteal bone formation during aging. Thus, large amounts of bone are resorbed in men as well as in women, accounting for the age-related increase in spine fractures in both genders. Periosteal bone formation increases CSA and offsets bone loss in both genders but more greatly in men, accounting for the lower incidence of spine fractures in men than in women. We speculate that reduced periosteal bone formation, during growth or aging, may be in part responsible for both reduced vertebral size and reduced vBMD in men and women with spine fractures. Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than age-related bone loss. (J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:2267-2275)