Objectives: Lung remains the least-utilized solid organ for transplantation. Efforts to recover donor lungs with reversible injuries using ex vivo perfusion systems are limited to<24 hours of support. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of extending normothermic extracorporeal lung support to 4 days using crosscirculation with conscious swine.Methods: A swine behavioral training program and custom enclosure were developed to enable multiday cross-circulation between extracorporeal lungs and recipient swine. Lungs were ventilated and perfused in a normothermic chamber for 4 days. Longitudinal analyses of extracorporeal lungs (ie, functional assessments, multiscale imaging, cytokine quantification, and cellular assays) and recipient swine (eg, vital signs and blood and tissue analyses) were performed.
Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) often require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Providers may be reluctant to perform tracheostomies on patients during ECMO due to their tenuous clinical status and systemic anticoagulation. We report our experience with performing open and percutaneous tracheostomies on patients supported on ECMO from August 2009 to December 2017. Of the 127 patients who underwent tracheostomy during ECMO support, the median age was 42 years (interquartile range [IQR], 29–54), 99 (78%) patients had venovenous (VV) cannulation, 22 (17%) patients had venoarterial (VA) cannulation, and six (5%) patients had hybrid configurations. Percutaneous tracheostomy was performed in 110 (87%) patients. Median-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at the time of tracheostomy was 47.5 seconds (IQR, 41–57.6 seconds). The median time from ECMO initiation to tracheostomy was 7 days (IQR, 4–11 days). A total of 55 patients (43%) received packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions within 48 hours after tracheostomy with a median transfusion of 2 units (IQR, 1–3). There was no procedural mortality. Overall, 88 (69%) patients survived to decannulation and 74 (58%) survived to hospital discharge. Our experience with the largest published series of tracheostomies during ECMO demonstrates that excellent outcomes can be achieved without significant morbidity.
Purpose of reviewThis review is intended to provide an update on the logistics, technique, and outcomes associated with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), as well as provide a discussion of the associated ethical issues.Recent findingsThere has been renewed interest in utilizing NRP to increase quality and availability of organs from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. Our institution has increasing experience with thoraco-abdominal NRP (TA-NRP) in controlled DCD donors (cDCD), whereas abdominal NRP (A-NRP) has been used with success in both cDCD and uncontrolled DCD (uDCD). There is increasing evidence that NRP can be conducted in a practical and cost-efficient manner, and that the organ yield may be of better quality than standard direct procurement and perfusion (DPP).SummaryNRP is increasingly successful and will likely prove to be a superior method for cDCD recovery. However, before TA-NRP can be widely accepted the ethical debate surrounding this technique must be settled.Video abstracthttp://links.lww.com/COOT/A11
Objectives: Venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal may be lifesaving in the setting of status asthmaticus. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Medical ICU. Patients: Twenty-six adult patients with status asthmaticus treated with venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Demographic data and characteristics of current and prior asthma treatments were obtained from the electronic medical record. Mechanical ventilator settings, arterial blood gases, vital signs, and use of vasopressors were collected from the closest time prior to cannulation and 24 hours after initiation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal settings, including blood flow and sweep gas flow, were collected at 24 hours after initiation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Outcome measures included rates of survival to hospital discharge, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal support, and complications during extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Following the initiation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, blood gas values were significantly improved at 24 hours, as were peak airway pressures, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, and use of vasopressors. Survival to hospital discharge was 100%. Twenty patients (76.9%) were successfully extubated while receiving extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal support; none required reintubation. The most common complication was cannula-associated deep venous thrombosis (six patients, 23.1%). Four patients (15.4%) experienced bleeding that required a transfusion of packed RBCs. Conclusions: In the largest series to date, use of venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients with status asthmaticus can provide a lifesaving means of support until the resolution of the exacerbation, with an acceptably low rate of complications. Early extubation in select patients receiving extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal is safe and feasible and avoids the deleterious effects of positive-pressure mechanical ventilation in this patient population.
Background: Despite the rapid integration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) into intensive care units over the past decade, established programs for training critical care clinicians to provide ECMO are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary ECMO training program for the rapid deployment of ECMO training for a high volume of critical care clinicians. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study examining a program for rapid training of multiple disciplines of critical care clinicians to deliver ECMO during the implementation of ECMO services across the intensive care units of an academic tertiary care center between October 2018 and January 2019. The multidisciplinary ECMO training program included didactic and simulation-based teaching and emphasized new, universal clinical protocols to improve consistency of care across the institution. Pre- and post-program written examinations evaluated knowledge acquisition, and an electronically distributed program evaluation assessed perceptions of content and delivery. Results: Among the 97 clinicians who completed the program, 49 (51%) were physicians and 48 (49%) were advanced practice providers from the departments of surgery ( n = 42), medicine ( n = 29), and anesthesia ( n = 26). There was a significant difference in knowledge about ECMO between the pre- and post-program examination score (median [interquartile range] 70% [60–80%] vs. 90% [80–90%], respectively, P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) individual gain from pre- to post-program score was 20% (10–30%). The program was perceived as useful and applicable to safe care. Conclusion: Rapid deployment of a multidisciplinary ECMO training program across a large academic center was feasible, achieved knowledge acquisition, and was positively perceived.
Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to provide support for patients with cardiopulmonary failure. Best available medical management often fails in these patients and referring hospitals have no further recourse for escalating care apart from transfer to a tertiary facility. In severely unstable patients, the only option might be to use ECMO to facilitate safe transport. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and outcomes of patients transported while receiving ECMO.Methods: Statistical analysis was performed on data gathered retrospectively from the electronic medical records of adult patients transported while receiving
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.