Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a grade IV brain tumor characterized by a heterogeneous population of cells that are highly infiltrative, angiogenic and resistant to chemotherapy. The current standard of care, comprised of surgical resection followed by radiation and the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide, only provides patients with a 12–14 month survival period post-diagnosis. Long-term survival for GBM patients remains uncommon as cells with intrinsic or acquired resistance to treatment repopulate the tumor. In this review we will describe the mechanisms of resistance, and how they may be overcome to improve the survival of GBM patients by implementing novel chemotherapy drugs, new drug combinations and new approaches relating to DNA damage, angiogenesis and autophagy.

Despite great efforts taken to advance therapeutic measures for patients with glioblastoma, the clinical prognosis remains grim. The antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein Mcl-1 is overexpressed in glioblastoma and represents an important resistance factor to the BH-3 mimetic ABT263.In this study, we show that combined treatment with ABT263 and GX15-070 overcomes apoptotic resistance in established glioblastoma cell lines, glioma stem-like cells and primary cultures. Moreover, this treatment regimen also proves to be advantageous in vivo. On the molecular level, GX15-070 enhanced apoptosis by posttranslational down-regulation of the deubiquitinase, Usp9X, and the chaperone Bag3, leading to a sustained depletion of Mcl-1 protein levels. Moreover, knock-down of Usp9X or Bag3 depleted endogenous Mcl-1 protein levels and in turn enhanced apoptosis induced through Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibition.In conclusion, combined treatment with ABT263 and GX15-070 results in a significantly enhanced anti-cancer activity in vitro as well as in vivo in the setting of glioblastoma. Both drugs, ABT263 and GX15-070 have been evaluated in clinical studies which facilitates the translational aspect of taking this combinatorial approach to the clinical setting. Furthermore we present a novel mechanism by which GX15-070 counteracts Mcl-1 expression which may lay a foundation for a novel target in cancer therapy.

The cellular responses to two new temozolomide (TMZ) analogues, DP68 and DP86, acting against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines and primary culture models are reported. Dose-response analysis of cultured GBM cells revealed that DP68 is more potent than DP86 and TMZ and that DP68 was effective even in cell lines resistant to TMZ. Based on a serial neurosphere assay, DP68 inhibits repopulation of these cultures at low concentrations. The efficacy of these compounds was independent of MGMT and MMR functions. DP68-induced interstrand DNA crosslinks were demonstrated with H2O2-treated cells. Furthermore, DP68 induced a distinct cell cycle arrest with accumulation of cells in S phase that is not observed for TMZ. Consistent with this biological response, DP68 induces a strong DNA damage response, including phosphorylation of ATM, Chk1 and Chk2 kinases, KAP1, and histone variant H2AX. Suppression of FANCD2 expression or ATR expression/kinase activity enhanced anti-glioblastoma effects of DP68. Initial pharmacokinetic analysis revealed rapid elimination of these drugs from serum. Collectively, these data demonstrate that DP68 is a novel and potent anti-glioblastoma compound that circumvents TMZ resistance, likely as a result of its independence from MGMT and mismatch repair and its capacity to crosslink strands of DNA.

Resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) in the majority of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is mediated by O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT). In this study, the efficacy of TMZ, a mono-functional methylating agent, was compared to a bi-functional TMZ analog (DP68) and a corresponding mono-functional TMZ analog (DP86) in established glioma lines (T98, U251), primary GBM xenograft lines (GBM12, GBM22, GBM6) and a TMZ-resistant model with high level MGMT expression (GBM12TMZ). Using a combination of CyQuant and neurosphere assays, the IC50 with TMZ treatment for MGMT expressing lines (U251, GBM12, GBM22) was much lower than non-expressing lines (T98, G6, G12TMZ), while all lines were sensitive to DP68 regardless of MGMT status (see Table). In the same assays, cells were less sensitive to DP86, but cytotoxicity was also independent of MGMT status. In both U251 and T98, DP68 resulted in a time-and dose-dependent induction of markers for DNA damage and checkpoint activation (P-H2AX, ATM, KAP1, Chk1 and Chk2) and a pronounced S-phase arrest within 24 hours of treatment. Based on these results and the hypothesis that DP68 induces DNA cross-links, siRNA knockdown was used to further dissect the importance of the ATM and ATR signaling pathways and the Fanconi Anemia (FA) cross-link repair pathway for DP68 cytotoxicity. Compared to no treatment, 1 microM DP68 resulted in 100% relative absorbance in siCONtrol transfected U251 cells, 41% for siATR, 35% for siFANCD2 and 90% for siATM. In contrast, only siATR and not siFAND2 nor siATM sensitized U251 cells to DP86. Similarly, inhibition of ATR (VE-821), but not ATM (KU-60019) potently sensitized cells to DP68 (see Table). Taken together, the inhibitory effects of DP68 are superior to TMZ in the GBM cell lines tested, regardless of MGMT expression. Furthermore, the siRNA and western blotting suggest that recovery from DP68 is dependent on ATR and the FA repair pathway. TMZ (IC50, microM) DP68 (IC50, microM)) DP86 (IC50, microM)) CyQuant Ctrl 1uM VE-821 1uM KU-60019 Ctrl 1uM VE-821 1uM KU-60019 Ctrl 1uM VE-821 1uM KU-60019 U251 25 20 20 2.5 0.8 2.1 70 40 65 T98 >320 200 260 9 2 7 115 60 115 Neurosphere Ctrl VE-821 KU-60019 Ctrl VE-821 KU-60019 Ctrl VE-821 KU-60019 G12 4 3.2 4.2 0.9 0.08 0.7 18 6 18 G22 40 NA NA 1 NA NA 40 NA NA G6 160 NA NA 0.5 NA NA 15 NA NA G12TMZ >300 NA NA 2 NA NA 22 NA NA Citation Format: Ann C. Mladek Tuma, Yulian Ramirez, Dimitrios Pletsas, Richard T. Wheelhouse, Roger M. Phillips, Ross H. Alonzo, Kaitlyn Knudson, Jann N. Sarkaria. Cytotoxicity of a novel bi-functional temozolomide analog, DP68, is independent of MGMT status in glioblastoma models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4476. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4476

<p>Supplementary Figure S1. Structures of TMZ, DP68, and DP86.</p>