The aim of this study was to compare treatment regimens of tacrolimus and of topical steroids for VKC and suggest a treatment protocol according to our clinical experience. MethodsThis retrospective, nonrandomized case series enrolled 85 Patients with VKC. Patients were classi ed clinically according to severity (mild, moderate, severe) and were treated according to a suggested protocol. Analysis was made according to treatment received: tacrolimus ointment as rst line treatment (tacrolimus 1st line), tacrolimus ointment after topical steroid drops treatment (tacrolimus 2nd line) and topical steroid drops or arti cial tears alone (topical steroid and tears group). ResultsSigni cant improvements in clinical signs and symptoms were achieved under tacrolimus treatment 14 months in the moderate group and 5 months in the severe group. The longest duration of treatment was for tacrolimus 2nd line group (p=0.031) and the mean number of visits in the clinic was the highest. The mean number of topical treatments per day was higher in the topical steroid and tears group (2.6 times) than in the two tacrolimus groups (1.3 times for both). The mean time needed to achieve disease remission or relief did not differ between the tacrolimus 1st line and 2nd line groups. ConclusionTacrolimus treatment is effective and safe for VKC. Tacrolimus as 1st line treatment may be preferred for severe cases, for faster disease remission compared to tacrolimus as 2nd line treatment; and with fewer topical treatments per day compared to topical steroids. Key MessagesWe suggest a treatment protocol for VKC. Mild cases: 1 month course of topical steroids twice a day combined with arti cial tears. Moderate cases: 1 month of topical steroids 3-4 times a day and arti cial tears. Severe cases: tacrolimus 0.03% ointment combined with arti cial tears.

The aim of the present study was to explore ophthalmologists’ attitudes, knowledge, and willingness to report child abuse. One-hundred-and-seven ophthalmologists employed in various hospitals in Israel completed an online questionnaire. Less than half the ophthalmologists (44.9%) reported that they had treated children whom they identified or suspected as being victims of child abuse, while only 43.9% of these reported child abuse. Despite generally positive attitudes towards reporting of child abuse among the ophthalmologists, their average level of knowledge was low. Ophthalmologists who had received training on child abuse and residents displayed a higher level of knowledge. In addition, female ophthalmologists tended to agree more that ophthalmologists are obligated to screen for and report child abuse. Moreover, female ophthalmologists expressed higher willingness to report child abuse. The present study reveals that underreporting of child abuse, and more precisely the discrepancy between identification and reporting, is present among ophthalmologists. It seems that lack of knowledge regarding identification and reporting of child abuse is the main barrier to reporting, especially among medical specialists. These findings underscore the importance of training programs on child abuse, both during formal education in medical school, and post-qualification, for all ophthalmologists, irrespective of seniority.

Background We aimed to explore the role of parental health beliefs in parent seeking of eye examinations for their children, using the Health Belief Model. Methods In this quantitative correlational survey study, 100 parents who presented to Barzilai University Medical Center in July 2021 to perform an eye examination to their child completed a questionnaire. Results Only 29.6% of the parents knew that a vision screening is performed in first grade, and 10% of the parents were unsure about where to find local eye care for their kids. Moreover, 19% of the parents indicated that they were concerned that their child would be prescribed glasses unnecessarily, and 10% believed that wearing glasses would weaken their child’s eyes. Various parental health beliefs regarding children’s eye examinations were found associated with parent seeking of eye examinations for their child. Thus, perceived susceptibility (r = 0.52, p < 0.01), perceived benefits (r = 0.39, p < 0.01), and perceived barriers (r=-0.31, p < 0.01) are associated with parent seeking of eye examinations for their child. Also, parents’ level of knowledge was associated with seeking eye examinations for their child (r = 0.20, p < 0.01). Conclusion Parent perceptions of the child’s susceptibility to vision problems and perceived barriers to seeking eye examinations predicted parents seeking of eye examinations for their child. Interventions aimed at increasing timely eye examinations among children should focus on raising parent awareness of vision problems in childhood, dispelling misconceptions, and providing parents with practical information regarding available services.

Background We aimed to explore the role of parental health beliefs in parent seeking of eye examinations for their children, using the Health Belief Model. Methods In this quantitative correlational survey study, 100 parents who presented to Barzilai University Medical Center in July 2021 to perform an eye examination to their child completed a questionnaire. Results Only 29.6% of the parents knew that a vision screening is performed in first grade, and 10% of the parents did not know where to access eye care for their child. Moreover, 19% of the parents indicated that they were concerned that their child would be prescribed glasses unnecessarily, and 10% believed that wearing glasses would weaken their child's eyes. Various parental health beliefs regarding children’s eye examinations were found associated with parent seeking of eye examinations for their child. Thus, perceived susceptibility (r = 0.52, p < 0.01), perceived benefits (r = 0.39, p < 0.01), and perceived barriers (r=-0.31, p < 0.01) are associated with parent seeking of eye examinations for their child. Also, parents' level of knowledge was associated with seeking eye examinations for their child (r = 0.20, p < 0.01). Conclusion Parent perceptions of the child’s susceptibility to vision problems and perceived barriers to seeking eye examinations predicted parents seeking of eye examinations for their child. Interventions aimed at increasing timely eye examinations among children should focus on raising parent awareness of vision problems in childhood, dispelling misconceptions, and providing parents with practical information regarding available services.

Purpose: To compare the ability to detect refractive anomalies in children using automated refraction versus retinoscopic cycloplegic refraction. Methods: A pediatric population from a pediatric eye institute underwent complete ophthalmic examinations. Children were randomly assigned to one of two pediatric optometrists who performed manual cycloplegic refraction using retinoscopy and automated cycloplegic refraction using a handheld autorefractometer (Retinomax K-plus 5; Right Mfg. Co., Ltd.). Recorded patient data included refraction values for each eye (sphere, astigmatism, and axis), use of glasses, and degree of cooperation. Results: Two hundred thirteen children were included. The mean age was 6.2 years. For all ages, strong associations were found in sphere and spherical equivalent (SE) measurements between the two methods (b = 0.78, P < .001; b = 0.71, P < .001; respectively). Among children older than 5 years, associations between the two methods were significant in all parameters (sphere: b = 0.99, P < .001; astigmatism: b = 0.69, P < .001; axis: b = 0.19, P < .05; SE: b = 0.97, P < .001), whereas among children 5 years and younger, a significant association was found only in the axis measurements (b = 0.31, P < .01). Retinomax K-plus 5 measurements showed significantly more hyperopic results in sphere measurements and higher astigmatism in all children examined, but this difference was markedly higher in children 5 years and younger. Good cooperation was observed in 94.1% of children older than 5 years and 77% of children 5 years and younger ( P < .001). Conclusions: The Retinomax K-plus 5 may be used for screening in children older than 5 years. However, in all age groups, it may not be accurate enough for treatment and decision making, even with good cooperation. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2022;59(6):380–387.]