COVID-19 has spread beyond China at lightning speed. Fear-based responses have moved even faster. Before we knew the term 'social distancing', Asian restaurants around the world saw a drop in clientele (Yeung 2020) and Asian people a rise in harassment (Yan et al. 2020). This fear of a marked group of people and their food fuels more than individual incidents. We argue that such alimentary xenophobia also leads to calls to eliminate foreign foodways without considering their social, economic and gastronomic values. Subtly embedded in these calls is the presumed superiority of industrialised, corporate foodways. The novel coronavirus likely first appeared at an open-air wet market in Wuhan, China, where meat was sold alongside live animals in conditions conducive to zoonotic viral transmission (Brulliard 2020; Woo et al. 2006). Many have called for the immediate closure of wet markets, reflecting the urgent need to change animal procurement, transport and slaughter practices (Blakeman 2020; Forgey 2020). These 'calls to close', however, homogenise heterogeneous markets around the world, painting them as universally dangerous instead of recognising specific practices within them as predictable catalysts for preventable disease. They also fail to recognise wet markets' social, economic and alimentary functions. 'Traditional' or 'municipal' wet markets are globally critical food centres, serving people and places that supermarkets do not (Figuié and Moustier 2009). From New York to Nairobi, Wageningen to Wuhan, open-air markets selling fruits, vegetables, meats and, in some cases, wild animals are bedrocks of diverse food economies. Broadly dismissing wet markets endangers the foodways of billions of people, from small-scale farmers to market vendors and urban eaters. Calls to close 'filthy' markets in poor countries (e.g. Froelich 2020) also slip into discourses of hygienic racism (Colloredo-Mansfeld 1998) and developmentalism (McMichael 2016). Such tropes shift geographies of blame to foreign foodways. For 'us' to be safe, this logic holds, 'they' must shut their markets. But where should people shop instead?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.