There is growing evidence of the clinical significance of daytime masked hypertension (MHT) and blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV). Recently, watch‐type wearable devices for self‐BP measurement have become available. Such devices might be promising tools to identify patients with daytime MHT or large BPV in their real‐life conditions. The present study aimed to validate the accuracy of the Omron HEM‐6410T‐ZM and the Omron HEM‐6410T‐ZL, which are automatic watch‐type wearable devices for self‐BP measurement, according to the American National Standards Institute, Inc/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization (ANSI/AAMI/ISO) 81060‐2:2013 guideline. Watches were held with the wrist at heart level. The mean differences between reference BPs and HEM‐6410T‐ZM readings were −0.9 ± 7.6/‐1.1 ± 6.1 mm Hg for systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) for criterion 1, and −0.9 ± 6.8/‐1.1 ± 5.5 mm Hg for SBP/DBP for criterion 2. The mean differences between reference BPs and HEM‐6410T‐ZL readings were 2.4 ± 7.3/0.7 ± 7.0 mm Hg for SBP/DBP for criterion 1, and 2.4 ± 6.5/0.7 ± 6.5 mm Hg for SBP/DBP for criterion 2. The Omron HEM‐6410T‐ZM and the Omron HEM‐6410T‐ZL both fulfilled both validation criteria 1 and 2 of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060‐2:2013 guidelines.

This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the Omron HEM‐9601T, an automatic wrist‐type device for self‐blood pressure (BP) measurement with a timer function for automatic measurement of nocturnal BP, in the sitting position according to the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization (ANSI/AAMI/ISO) 81060‐2:2013 guidelines, and to assess its performance in the supine position by applying the same protocol as conducted in the sitting position. The mean differences between the reference BPs and HEM‐9601T readings were 1.2 ± 6.9/1.1 ± 5.5 mmHg, 2.2 ± 6.5/1.8 ± 5.7 mmHg, 0.1 ± 6.6/1.5 ± 6.2 mmHg, and −0.8 ± 7.2/0.5 ± 6.4 mmHg for systolic BP/diastolic BP for criterion 1 in the sitting position, supine with sideways palm position, supine with upward palm position, and supine with downward palm position, respectively. In addition, the mean differences and their standard deviations for systolic BP and diastolic BP calculated according to criterion 2 in the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060‐2:2013 guidelines were acceptable in all four positions. In conclusion, the Omron HEM‐9601T fulfilled the validation criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060‐2:2013 guidelines when used in the sitting position with the wrist at heart level, and its accuracy in the supine position was acceptable and roughly equivalent to that in the sitting position. The wrist‐type home BP monitor could be a more suitable tool for repeated nocturnal BP measurements at home than upper‐arm devices, and could improve the reliability of diagnosis and management of nocturnal hypertension.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the Omron HEM‐9600T, an automatic wrist‐type device for self BP measurement, in the sitting position with the wrist at heart level and supine position according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060‐2:2013 guidelines. In the supine position, we evaluated the device under 3 different conditions: using the supine with sideways palm position, the supine with upwards palm position, and the supine with downwards palm position. After 106 subjects were screened and 21 subjects were excluded, the same 85 subjects (38 men [44.7%] and 47 women [55.3%]) were included in the analyses for each position. The average age of the subjects was 54.5 ± 12.2 years (mean ± SD). The mean wrist circumference was 17.0 ± 2.4 cm. The wrist size distribution fulfilled the requirements of the guidelines. The mean differences between reference BPs and HEM‐9600T readings were 1.0 ± 6.7/1.4 ± 5.7 mm Hg, 6.6 ± 7.2/5.5 ± 6.0 mm Hg, 4.8 ± 7.2/4.9 ± 5.8 mm Hg, and 2.1 ± 7.2/2.8 ± 6.8 mm Hg for SBP/DBP in the sitting position, supine with sideways palm position, supine with upwards palm position, and supine with downwards palm position, respectively. In conclusion, the Omron HEM‐9600T in the sitting position fulfilled the validation criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060‐2:2013 guidelines. On the other hand, the accuracies of HEM‐9600T in the supine position differed depending on the positioning of the palm, with only the downwards palm‐position measurement fulfilling both validation criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060‐2:2013 guidelines.

Objective Performance of the Omron HBP-1320, designed for professional use by adding several features to the home blood pressure (BP) measuring device, was validated using two different protocols, specifically the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO) and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, 2010 Revision (ESH IP2), as a separate study. Methods Three trained medical technologists validated the performance of this device by comparing data obtained from the device with those obtained using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer throughout the study. Results Mean differences in mercury readings for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between the devices were 1.6 ± 5.8 and −0.4 ± 5.3 mmHg, respectively, according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol, and mean device-observer measurement differences were −0.4 ± 4.9 and −0.2 ± 4.2 mmHg, respectively, satisfying Part 1 of ESH IP2. Differences in SBP and DBP both satisfied Part 2 of ESH IP2. The number of absolute differences in the values obtained using the device and those obtained by the observers fulfilled the requirements of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol and ESH IP2. Conclusion Omron HBP-1320 met all requirements of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol and ESH IP2.

No abstract