Background
Robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) has been increasingly used for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). However, whether RDG has a clinical advantage over laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) is yet to be determined. Thus, this study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of RDG for the treatment of GC as compared with LDG.
Methods
In total, 157 patients were enrolled between February 2018 and August 2020 in this retrospective study. We then compared the surgical outcomes between RDG and LDG using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis to reduce the confounding differences.
Results
After PSM, a clinicopathologically well-balanced cohort of 100 patients (50 in each group) was analyzed. The operation time for the RDG group (350.1 ± 58.1 min) was determined to be significantly longer than that for the LDG group (257.5 ± 63.7 min; P < 0.0001). Of interest, there was a decreased incidence of pancreatic fistulas and severe complications after RDG as compared with LDG (P = 0.092 and P = 0.061, respectively). In addition, postoperative hospital stay was statistically slightly shorter in the RDG group as compared with the LDG group (12.0 ± 5.6 vs. 13.0 ± 12.3 days; P = 0.038).
Conclusions
Our study confirmed that RDG is a feasible and safe procedure for GC in terms of short-term surgical outcomes. A surgical robot might reduce postoperative severe complications and length of hospital stay.
Background/Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative skeletal muscle mass and muscle mass loss after surgery on overall survival in patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical resection. We also examined factors involved in postoperative skeletal muscle loss. Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty gastric cancer patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively examined. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured using computed tomography before surgery and 1 year after. Degree of muscle reduction (MR) was calculated. Patients were stratified according to preoperative SMI (high/low) and MR (high/low) for analysis. In addition, patients were grouped according to SMI and MR stratification as follows: group A, low SMI/high MR; group B, low SMI/low MR; group C, high SMI/high MR; and group D, high SMI/low MR. Results: In multivariate analysis, preoperative SMI and MR were independent predictors of overall survival. Overall survival significantly differed among groups A, B, C, and D (p<0.0001). The list of groups in order of worsening overall survival was as follows: group D, group C, group B, and group A. In multivariate analysis, patient group according to SMI and MR stratification was an independent predictor of overall survival. MR was affected by operation time (>430 min) and surgical procedure (total gastrectomy). Conclusion: Preoperative SMI and reduction in skeletal muscle mass after gastric cancer surgery were significantly associated with overall survival. Long-term management of these patients should focus on maintenance of postoperative skeletal muscle mass.
Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is an alternative minimally invasive surgical technique that has gradually come into use for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of RG for the treatment of GC. We retrospectively reviewed the use of RG in 47 patients with GC, and clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes were evaluated. The median age and body mass index of the patients were 68 years and 21.9 kg/m 2 , respectively. Distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, and proximal gastrectomy were performed in 39 (83.0%), 5 (10.6%), and 3 (6.4%) patients, respectively. The median operative time was 354 (256-603) min. None of the operations were converted to open or laparoscopic procedures. The median blood loss was 15 (2-350) ml. None of the patients required blood transfusion. The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 43 (7-93). The median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 13 (9-37) days. Approximately 4.3% and 2.1% of the patients had anastomotic leakage and pancreatic fistula, respectively. One (2.1%) patient had Clavien-Dindo classification grade IIIa surgical complication (anastomotic leakage). No treatment-related deaths were observed. These findings suggest that RG might be a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of GC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.