The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J‐SSCG 2020), a Japanese‐specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J‐SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English‐language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese‐language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high‐quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J‐SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU‐acquired weakness [ICU‐AW], post‐intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J‐SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient‐ and family‐centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro‐intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large‐scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE‐based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J‐SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Our multidisciplinary approach for infants with acute liver failure achieved favorable outcomes. Further investigations are needed to examine the efficacy of the artificial liver support.

We used dexmedetomidine for more than 2 months in a mechanically ventilated infant without serious adverse effects. An infant with liver cirrhosis of unknown cause underwent living donor liver transplantation at the age of 9 months. Long-term mechanical ventilation was required postoperatively, and midazolam with fentanyl had been used to sedate the patient. They required increase to 1.7 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) and 3.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1), respectively, which were still inadequate. On postoperative day 29, dexmedetomidine was added. The rate of dexmedetomidine infusion was increased gradually to 1.4 microg.kg(-1).h(-1). It was discontinued temporarily to exclude drug-induced liver dysfunction. However, without dexmedetomidine, adequate sedation level was unattainable. Liver dysfunction was likely to be attributed to cytomegalovirus infection and after restarting dexmedetomidine, the respiratory condition improved. He was extubated 10 weeks after the operation. Dexmedetomidine was successfully tapered off over the following 2 weeks with no signs of withdrawal. Dexmedetomidine was a useful sedative for an infant who required mechanical ventilation for a prolonged period of time.

Malnutrition suppresses reproductive function in mammals, which is considered to be mostly due to the inhibition of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/gonadotropin secretion. Accumulating evidence suggests that kisspeptin neurons in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) play a critical role in the regulation of pulsatile GnRH/gonadotropin release. The present study aimed to examine if the hypothalamic dynorphin A (Dyn) neurons mediate the suppression of GnRH/luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses during malnutrition. Ovariectomized rats treated with a negative feedback level of estradiol-17β-treated (OVX+E2) were administered with peripheral (iv) or fourth cerebroventricle (4V) 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), an inhibitor of glucose utilization, to serve as a malnutrition model. Central administration of a Dyn receptor antagonist blocked the iv- or 4V-2DG-induced suppression of LH pulses in OVX+E2 rats. The 4V 2DG administration significantly increased the number of Pdyn (Dyn gene)-positive cells co-expressing fos in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), but not in the ARC and supraoptic nucleus (SON), and the iv 2DG treatment significantly increased the number of fos- and Pdyn-co-expressing cells in the PVN and SON, but decreased it in the ARC. The E2 treatment significantly increased Pdyn expression in the PVN, but not in the ARC and SON. Double in situ hybridization for Kiss1 (kisspeptin gene) and Oprk1 (Dyn receptor gene) revealed that around 60% of ARC Kiss1-expressing cells co-expressed Oprk1. These results suggest that the PVN Dyn neurons, at least in part, mediate LH pulse suppression induced by the hindbrain or peripheral glucoprivation, and Dyn neurons may directly suppress the ARC kisspeptin neurons in female rats