BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have been shown to be effective for the eradication of HPV and prevention of cervical cancer. However, the number of women who receive HPV vaccinations has decreased over the last several years in Japan, due to concerns about adverse reactions associated with the vaccines. We evaluated the safety of three types of HPV vaccines separately in young women and the difference in the risk of adverse reactions between HPV and other vaccines by conducting a meta-analysis.MethodsPrimary literature was retrieved from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Japana Centra Revuo Medicina. Prospective controlled studies with participants consisting exclusively of healthy women who received bivalent, quadrivalent, or 9-valent HPV (2vHPV, 4vHPV or 9vHPV) vaccines were included. Primary safety outcome was the incidence of solicited local and systemic symptoms, and unsolicited symptoms. When two or more studies were found for the same analysis, a meta-analysis was applied.ResultsA total of 24 controlled studies from 22 articles were included in our study. Of the 24 studies, 16 were placebo-controlled and eight were active-controlled (different HPV vaccine or hepatitis vaccine). Average ages of the participants ranged from 12 to 37 years. A significantly higher incidence of solicited local symptoms was observed following injection of HPV vaccines (2vHPV and 4vHPV) compared to placebo, but there was no difference between HPV vaccines [risk ratio (RR) for 2vHPV: 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09 to 1.43, RR for 4vHPV: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.20]. The incidence of solicited systemic symptoms was not different between HPV vaccines and placebo (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.09). The incidence of unsolicited symptoms was significantly higher for 2vHPV vaccine compared to placebo (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.63), but was not significantly different between 2vHPV and hepatitis B vaccines.ConclusionsHPV vaccines had significantly higher risk of any injection site symptom compared to placebo or other vaccines (hepatitis A and B vaccines), and the incidence of solicited local symptoms was no difference between 2vHPV vaccination and 4vHPV vaccination. However, the most adverse reactions were transient.
Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. However, the impact of clinical characteristics on nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin has not been determined. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical characteristics and nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin. We identified clinical research published from January 1975 to June 2021 using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, which described the nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin. Meta-analysis determined the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Using meta-regression analysis, we evaluated the impact of clinical characteristics on outcomes. Of the 567 articles, eight articles including 634 patients were analysed. The overall incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin was 11.0% (95% confidence interval: 8.0-13.0) for the fixed-effect model.Additionally, patients with >65 years had a high trend for the risk of nephrotoxicity compared to those with ≤65 years (>65 years; 12.0% [95% confidence interval: 9.0-15.0] vs. ≤65 years; 7.0% [95% confidence interval: 3.0-12.0], p = 0.09) for the fixed-effect model. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that only serum albumin level negatively correlated with the risk of nephrotoxicity (y = À17.0 x + 56.7, r = 0.74, p = 0.01). This meta-analysis ascertained that hypoalbuminemia leads to nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin.
Background Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) potentially increases the serum creatinine levels, resulting in acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the clinical characteristics of the AKI associated with SMX/TMP and the risk factors for its development have not been fully characterized. Methods A retrospective cohort observational analysis was conducted on adult inpatients who started SMX/TMP treatment at the Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Yachiyo Medical Center, from April 2018 to March 2020. The primary outcome was AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of ≥ 50% from baseline. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for the AKI associated with SMX/TMP. Results Of the 281 patients, 32 (11.4%) developed AKI. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.76–0.97, p < 0.01), presence of hypertension (OR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.11–6.49, p = 0.02), SMX/TMP daily dose (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.30, p = 0.02), and concomitant loop diuretic use (OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.08–7.78, p = 0.04) were the associated risk factors for AKI in patients who were administered SMX/TMP. Conclusions This study showed that low BMI, hypertension, high-dose SMX/TMP, and concomitant loop diuretic use increased the risk of AKI in patients administered SMX/TMP. Clinicians should consider monitoring the renal function in patients at a high risk of AKI.
Patients admitted in rehabilitation wards are usually older than those in general wards. Since elderly patients suffer from multiple co-morbidities thus showing a variety of symptoms, they are often at risk of polypharmacy. In the present retrospective observational study, we aimed to search for clinical characteristics of patients who were associated with factors influencing the number of drugs at discharge. One hundred and twenty-four patients (aged ≥65 years) who were admitted to rehabilitation wards in Setagaya Memorial Hospital between April and September either in 2013 and 2014 were enrolled in this study. Prescribed drugs during hospitalization, primary diseases and comorbid conditions were retrieved from the medical records of the patients. The mean age of the patients was 81 ∓ 8 years and 46% were men. Fifty-one patients (41%) were given polypharmacy at discharge. There was a significant reduction in the number of patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at discharge as compared admission. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the numbers of drugs prescribed at admission correlated (P < 0.05) with that prescribed at discharge. In addition, co-morbidities of heart disease and hypertension were associated with 1.2 and 0.9 more drugs at discharge, respectively. Pharmacists may intervene in the polypharmacy of patients more effectively if they take patients' clinical characteristics into account.
Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZDRAs) have been associated with an increased risk of falls in the elderly. However, the association between the elimination half-life (t 1/2) of BZDRAs and the diŠerence between benzodiazepines (BZDs) and non-benzodiazepines (Z-drugs) has not been clariˆed. By conducting a meta-analysis of observational studies, we compared the risk of falls with respect to 1) short-acting BZDRAs (t 1/2 < 12 h) vs. long-acting BZDRAs (t 1/2 12 h) and 2) BZDs vs. Z-drugs in elderly patients. Data were retrieved from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi. In total, 13 observational studies from 12 articles were included in our study (short-acting BZDRAs, n = 12; long-acting BZDRAs, n = 9; BZDs, n = 13; Z-drugs, n = 7). The risk of falls was signiˆcantly increased by the use of short-acting BZDRAs [Odds ratio (OR) (95% Conˆdence interval (CI)): 2.00 (1.46 2.73)], long-acting BZDRAs [OR (95%CI): 2.16 (1.61 2.89)], BZDs [OR (95%CI): 1.67 (1.31 2.13)], and Z-drugs [OR (95%CI): 2.42 (1.35 4.34)] compared to the risk in BZDRAs non-users. The increased risk of falls in elderly patients was similar in each group and unrelated to t 1/2. This study suggested that all BZDRAs including Z-drugs should be avoided in elderly patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.