The revised WHO classification newly defined the entities "High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBL-DH/TH)" and "HGBL, NOS." Standard immunochemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), R-CHOP, is insufficient for HGBL patients, and there are currently no optimized therapeutic regimens for HGBL. We previously reported that CCND3, which encodes cyclin D3, harbored high mutation rates in Burkitt lymphoma (BL), HGBL and a subset of DLBCL. Furthermore, the knockdown of cyclin D3 expression was toxic to germinal center (GC)-derived B-cell lymphomas. Thus, the fundamental function of cyclin D3 is important for the pathogenesis of GC-derived B-cell lymphoma. We herein used two structurally different CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and abemaciclib, and examined their suppressive effects on cell proliferation and their ability to induce apoptosis in various aggressive B-cell lymphoma cell lines. The results obtained demonstrated that abemaciclib more strongly suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in GC-derived B-cell lymphoma cell lines than the control, but only slightly inhibited those features in activated B-cell (ABC)-like DLBCL cell lines. Palbociclib exerted partial or incomplete effects compared with the control and the effect was intermediate between abemaciclib and the control. Moreover, the effects of abemaciclib appeared to depend on cyclin D3 expression levels based on the results of the expression analysis of primary aggressive B-cell lymphoma samples. Therefore, abemaciclib has potential as a therapeutic agent for aggressive GCderived B-cell lymphomas. K E Y W O R D S B-cell lymphoma, CDK4/6 inhibitor, cyclin D3, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, MYC
The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical regulator of the development of malignant lymphoma. Therapeutics targeting the TME, especially immune checkpoint molecules, are changing the treatment strategy for lymphoma. However, the overall response to these therapeutics for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is modest and new targets of immunotherapy are needed. To find critical immune checkpoint molecules for DLBCL, we explored the prognostic impact of immune checkpoint molecules and their ligands using publicly available datasets of gene expression profiles. In silico analysis of three independent datasets (GSE117556, GSE10846, and GSE181063) revealed that DLBCL expressing CD24 had a poor prognosis and had a high frequency of MYC aberrations. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis showed that the ‘MYC‐targets‐hallmark’ (false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.024) and ‘inflammatory‐response‐hallmark’ (FDR = 0.001) were enriched in CD24‐high and CD24‐low DLBCL, respectively. In addition, the expression of cell‐specific markers of various immune cells was higher in CD24‐low DLBCL than in CD24‐high DLBCL. CIBERSORT analysis of the datasets showed fewer macrophages in CD24‐high DLBCL than in CD24‐low DLBCL. Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis of 335 cases of DLBCL showed that few TME cells were found in CD24‐high DLBCL, although statistical differences were not observed. These data indicate that CD24 expression suppresses immune cell components of the TME in DLBCL, suggesting that CD24 may be a target for cancer immunotherapy in aggressive large B‐cell lymphoma.
Regressive lymphoproliferative disorders (R-LPD) after methotrexate (MTX) withdrawal are one of the specific features of methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (MTX-LPD). Although the impact of the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the pathogenesis of R-LPD has been recently emphasized, understanding relapse/regrowth events (RRE) and differences among LPD subtypes is necessary. In this study, we confirmed ALC recovery in the regressive group
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.