The mRNA deadenylation process, catalyzed by the CCR4 deadenylase, is known to be the major factor controlling mRNA decay rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have identified the proline-rich region and RRM1 domains of poly(A) binding protein (PAB1) as necessary for CCR4 deadenylation. Deletion of either of these regions but not other regions of PAB1 significantly reduced PAB1-PAB1 protein interactions, suggesting that PAB1 oligomerization is a required step for deadenylation. Moreover, defects in these two regions inhibited the formation of a novel, circular monomeric PAB1 species that forms in the absence of poly(A). Removal of the PAB1 RRM3 domain, which promoted PAB1 oligomerization and circularization, correspondingly accelerated CCR4 deadenylation. Circular PAB1 was unable to bind poly(A), and PAB1 multimers were severely deficient or unable to bind poly(A), implicating the PAB1 RNA binding surface as critical in making contacts that allow PAB1 self-association. These results support the model that the control of CCR4 deadenylation in vivo occurs in part through the removal of PAB1 from the poly(A) tail following its self-association into multimers and/or a circular species. Known alterations in the P domains of different PAB proteins and factors and conditions that affect PAB1 self-association would, therefore, be expected to be critical to controlling mRNA turnover in the cell.mRNA degradation is a process involving the interaction and exchange of multiple multisubunit complexes and RNA binding proteins (8). Central to mRNA degradation is the removal of the poly(A) tail (deadenylation) that is controlled by a number of proteins associating with the mRNA in a structure termed the mRNP. Principal among these factors present in the mRNP are the poly(A) binding protein (PAB1), translation initiation and termination factors, the cytoplasmic deadenylases, and the factors that bind to the mRNA and elicit alterations in the mRNA degradative rate. The processes of mRNA degradation and deadenylation and the protein complexes that are involved are highly evolutionarily conserved from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to humans.The principal pathway for mRNA degradation in yeast proceeds through several steps. First, there is an initial trimming of about 15 to 20 nucleotides (nt) of the poly(A) tail to a length of about 60 to 80 nt that is specific for each mRNA and that appears to be carried out by PAN2/PAN3, presumably a cytoplasmic process (2,19,48). This trimming requires PAB1 and the translation termination factors eRF1 and eRF3 (5, 24), and all these factors are known to associate with each other (10, 23, 24, 29). Second, the major part of deadenylation utilizes the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex (16,48). CCR4 is the catalytic component of this complex (7, 47) and shortens the poly(A) tail of mRNA to an end point size of about 8 to 12 nt (14). Poly(A) tail shortening down to an oligo(A) form (8 to 12 A's) may lead, in turn, to the reduced ability of PAB1 to bind the poly(A) tail that may alter the translation initiation...
The DBF2 gene of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a cell cycle-regulated protein kinase that plays an important role in the telophase/G 1 transition. As a component of the multisubunit CCR4 transcriptional complex, DBF2 is also involved in the regulation of gene expression. We have found that MOB1, an essential protein required for a late mitotic event in the cell cycle, genetically and physically interacts with DBF2. DBF2 binds MOB1 in vivo and can bind it in vitro in the absence of other yeast proteins. We found that the expression of MOB1 is also cell cycle regulated, its expression peaking slightly before that of DBF2 at the G 2 /M boundary. While overexpression of DBF2 suppressed phenotypes associated with mob1 temperaturesensitive alleles, it could not suppress a mob1 deletion. In contrast, overexpression of MOB1 suppressed phenotypes associated with a dbf2-deleted strain and suppressed the lethality associated with a dbf2 dbf20 double deletion. A mob1 temperature-sensitive allele with a dbf2 disruption was also found to be synthetically lethal. These results are consistent with DBF2 acting through MOB1 and aiding in its function. Moreover, the ability of temperature-sensitive mutated versions of the MOB1 protein to interact with DBF2 was severely reduced, confirming that binding of DBF2 to MOB1 is required for a late mitotic event. While MOB1 and DBF2 were found to be capable of physically associating in a complex that did not include CCR4, MOB1 did interact with other components of the CCR4 transcriptional complex. We discuss models concerning the role of DBF2 and MOB1 in controlling the telophase/G 1 transition.In eukaryotic cells, many of the cell cycle stages are regulated by phosphorylation, and a number of protein kinases involved in the cell cycle are known to date. The activities of these kinases are regulated by different mechanisms, including but not limited to formation of complexes with other proteins and cell cycle-dependent control of their expression. The DBF2 protein kinase from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for the proper progression through late mitosis, specifically during telophase (11,24). dbf2 temperature-sensitive mutant cells arrest at the restrictive temperature with a terminal "dumbbell" phenotype in which they display an elongated spindle and divided chromatin (11). DBF2 protein kinase activity is cell cycle controlled, peaking after the metaphase-to-anaphase transition, which is consistent with its late mitotic role (11,20). While a dbf2 deletion is not lethal, DBF2 plays an essential role in cells that also lack DBF20, a close homolog of DBF2 (23).We have recently shown that the DBF2 protein not only regulates cell cycle progression but also controls gene expression as one of the components of the CCR4 transcriptional complex (17). The CCR4 protein is a general transcriptional regulator which affects expression of a number of genes both positively and negatively (16). It is required for full expression of ADH2 and other nonfermentative genes ...
Of the nine known members of the CCR4-NOT complex, CCR4/CAF1 are most important in mRNA deadenylation whereas the NOT1-5 proteins are most critical for transcriptional repression. Whole genome microarray analysis using deletions in seven of the CCR4-NOT genes was used to determine the overall mRNA expression patterns that are affected by members of the yeast CCR4-NOT complex. Under glucose conditions, ccr4 and caf1 displayed a high degree of similarity in the manner that they affected gene expression. In contrast, the not deletions were similar in the way they affected genes, but showed no correlation with that of ccr4/caf1. A number of groups of functionally related proteins were specifically controlled by the CCR4/CAF1 or NOT modules. Importantly, the NOT proteins preferentially affected SAGA-controlled gene expression. Also, both the CCR4/CAF1 and NOT group of proteins shared much greater similarities in their effects on gene expression during the stress of glucose deprivation. BTT1, a member of the nascent polypeptide association complex that binds the ribosome, was shown to be a tenth member of the CCR4-NOT complex, interacting through CAF130. Microarray analysis indicated that BTT1 and CAF130 correlate very highly in their control of gene expression and preferentially repress genes involved in ribosome biogenesis. These results indicate that distinct portions of the CCR4-NOT complex control a number of different cellular processes.
The CAF1 protein is a component of the CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex. While yeast CAF1 displays deadenylase activity, this activity is not required for its deadenylation function in vivo, and CCR4 is the primary deadenylase in the complex. In order to identify CAF1-specific functional regions required for deadenylation in vivo, we targeted for mutagenesis six regions of CAF1 that are specifically conserved among CAF1 orthologs. Defects in residues 213–215, found to be a site required for binding CCR4, reduced the rate of deadenylation to a lesser extent and resulted in in vivo phenotypes that were less severe than did defects in other regions of CAF1 that displayed greater contact to CCR4. These results imply that CAF1, while affecting deadenylation through its contact to CCR4, has functions in deadenylation separate from its contact to CCR4. Synthetic lethalities of caf1Δ, but not that of ccr4Δ, with defects in DHH1 or PAB1, both of which are involved in translation, further supports a role of CAF1 separate from that of CCR4. Importantly, other mutations in PAB1 that reduced translation, while not affecting deadenylation by themselves or when combined with ccr4Δ, severely blocked deadenylation when coupled with a caf1 deletion. These results indicate that both CAF1 and factors involved in translation are required for deadenylation.
We have previously identified 55 nonribosomal proteins in PAB1-mRNP complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using mass spectrometric analysis. Because one of the inherent limitations of mass spectrometry is that it does not inform as to the size or type of complexes in which the proteins are present, we consequently used analytical ultracentrifugation with fluorescent detection system (AU-FDS) to determine which proteins are present in the 77S monosomal translation complex that contains minimally the closed-loop structure components (eIF4E, eIF4G, and PAB1), mRNA, and the 40S and 60S ribosomes. We assayed by AU-FDS analysis 33 additional PAB1-mRNP factors but found that only five of these proteins were present in the 77S translation complex: eRF1, SLF1, SSD1, PUB1, and SBP1. eRF1 is involved in translation termination, SBP1 is a translational repressor, and SLF1, SSD1, and PUB1 are known mRNA binding proteins. Many of the known P body/stress granule proteins that associate with the PAB1-mRNP were not present in the 77S translation complex, implying that P body/stress granules result from significant protein additions after translational cessation. These data inform that AU-FDS can clarify protein complex identification that remains undetermined after typical immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometric analyses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.