Highlights The overall prevalence of anxiety was 13.67% during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 epidemic among the teachers in China. The prevalence was higher for women than men (13.89% vs. 12.93%). After adjusting for potential confounders, age, sex, education status, type of teachers, school location, information source, worried level, fear level, and behavior status were found to be associated with anxiety.

Globally, vaccine hesitancy is a growing public health problem. It is detrimental to the consolidation of immunization program achievements and elimination of vaccine-targeted diseases. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China and explore its contributing factors. A national cross-sectional online survey among Chinese adults (≥18 years old) was conducted between August 6, 2021 and August 9 via a market research company. We collected sociodemographic information; lifestyle behavior; quality of life; the knowledge, awareness, and behavior of COVID-19; the knowledge, awareness, and behavior of COVID-19 vaccine; willingness of COVID-19 vaccination; accessibility of COVID-19 vaccination services; skepticism about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine; doctor and vaccine developer scale; and so on. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the associations by using logistic regression models. A total of 29,925 residents (48.64% men) were enrolled in our study with mean age of 30.99 years. We found an overall prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at 8.40% (95% CI, 8.09–8.72) in primary vaccination and 8.39% (95% CI, 8.07–8.70) in booster vaccination. In addition, after adjusting for potential confounders, we found that women, higher educational level, married residents, higher score of health condition, never smoked, increased washing hands, increased wearing mask, increased social distance, lower level of vaccine conspiracy beliefs, disease risks outweigh vaccine risk, higher level of convenient vaccination, and higher level of trust in doctor and developer were more willing to vaccinate than all others (all p < 0.05). Age, sex, educational level, marital status, chronic disease condition, smoking, healthy behaviors, the curability of COVID-19, the channel of accessing information of COVID-19 vaccine, endorsement of vaccine conspiracy beliefs, weigh risks of vaccination against risks of the disease, making a positive influence on the health of others around you, and lower trust in healthcare system may affect the variation of willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine (all p < 0.05). The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was modest in China, even with the slight resulting cascade of changing vaccination rates between the primary and booster vaccination. Urgent action to address vaccine hesitancy is needed in building trust in medical personnel and vaccine producers, promoting the convenience of vaccination services, and spreading reliable information of COVID-19 vaccination via the Internet and other media.

BackgroundChina has set up a universal coverage social health insurance system since the 2009 healthcare reform. Due to the inadequate funds, the social health insurance system reimbursed the inpatient expenditures with much higher ratio than outpatient expenditure. The gap in reimbursement ratios resulted in a rapid rising hospitalization rate but poor health outcomes among the Chinese population. A redistribution of social health insurance funds has become one of the main challenges for the performance of Social Health Insurance.MethodsTwo comparable counties, Dangyang County and Zhijiang County, in Hubei Province of China, were sampled as the intervention group and the control group, respectively. The Social Health Insurance Management Department of the intervention group budgeted 600 yuan per capita per year to the patients with 3rd stage hypertension to cover their outpatient expenditures. The outpatient spending in the control group were paid out-of-pocket. The inpatient expenditures reimbursement policies in both groups were not changed. Besides, the Social Health Insurance Management Department of the intervention group budgeted 100 yuan per patient per year to township physicians and hospitals to provide health management services for the patients. While, the health management services in the control group were still provided by health workers. A Propensity Score Matching model and Difference-in-differences model were used to estimate the net effects of the intervention in dimensions of medical services utilization, medical expenditures, SHI reimbursement, and health outcomes.ResultsOne thousand, six hundred and seventy three pairs of patients were taken as valid subjects to conduct Difference-in-differences estimation after the Propensity Score Matching. The net intervention effect is to increase outpatient frequency by 3.3 (81.0%) times (P < 0.05), to decrease hospitalization frequency by 0.075 (− 60.0%) times (P < 0.05), and to increase the per capita total medical service utilization frequency by 3.225 (76.8%) times (P < 0.05). The per capita total medical expenditure decreased 394.2 (− 27.7%) yuan. The SHI reimbursed 90.3 yuan more per capita for the outpatient spending, but the per capita inpatient expenditure reimbursement and per capita total medical expenditure reimbursement decreased significantly by 282.6 (− 44.0%) yuan and 192.3 (− 28.5%) yuan, respectively (P < 0.05). The intervention reduced the per capita inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure and the per capita total out-of-pocket expenditure by 192.8 (− 36.7%) yuan and 201.9 (− 29.9%) yuan, respectively (P < 0.05). The intervention significantly decreased the diastolic blood pressure of the intervention group by 2.9 mmHg (P < 0.05) but had no significant impact on the systolic blood pressure (− 7.9 mmHg, P > 0.05).ConclusionFor China and countries attempting to establish a universal coverage SHI with inadequate funds, inpatient services were expensive but might not produce good health outcomes. Outpatient care for patients with chronic dise...

No abstract