No abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly accepted as a treatment option for several cancers. Although various systemic immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) have been characterized, the effect of ICIs on the oral cavity and contiguous structures is still poorly understood. Methods Electronic medical records of 4683 patients in the Mass General Brigham Registered Patient Data Registry who received ICI therapy (ICIT) between December 2011 and September 2019 were reviewed. Reports of oral conditions were categorized into oral mucosal disorders, xerostomia, and dysgeusia. After applying exclusion criteria, demographic characteristics and clinical features were summarized for the patients who had oral irAEs. Results In total, 317 patients developed oral conditions that were associated with ICIT (incidence, 6.8%; 317 of 4683 patients). These conditions included xerostomia (68.5%), oral mucosal disorders (33.4%), and dysgeusia (24.0%). In patients with oral irAEs, respiratory cancer (28.4%) was the most common primary cancer, followed by melanoma (26.2%), and head and neck cancer (14.8%). Oral mucosal disorders developed after the initiation of ICIT between 2 and 851 days (between 1 and 1332 days in patients with xerostomia and between 1 and 1455 days in patients with dysgeusia). Of all oral irAEs, 50.9% developed within 3 months, and 85.5% developed within 12 months. Conclusions Oral side effects appear to be more common among patients who receive ICIT than has been previously reported. Concomitant cytotoxic regimens may exacerbate the risk of oral adverse events, perhaps representing the sum of the effects of different, but simultaneous or sequential, pathogenic mechanisms. Additional studies are warranted to better characterize oral irAEs and their biologic basis.

Objective To compare the reported efficacy and costs of available interventions used for the management of oral lichen planus (OLP). Materials and methods A systematic literature search was performed from database inception until March 2021 in MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane library following PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing an active intervention with placebo or different active interventions for OLP management were considered. Results Seventy (70) RCTs were included. The majority of evidence suggested efficacy of topical steroids (dexamethasone, clobetasol, fluocinonide, triamcinolone), topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, cyclosporine), topical retinoids, intra-lesional triamcinolone, aloe-vera gel, photodynamic therapy, and low-level laser therapies for OLP management. Based on the estimated cost per month and evidence for efficacy and side-effects, topical steroids (fluocinonide > dexamethasone > clobetasol > triamcinolone) appear to be more cost-effective than topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus > pimecrolimus > cyclosporine) followed by intra-lesional triamcinolone. Conclusion Of common treatment regimens for OLP, topical steroids appear to be the most economical and efficacious option followed by topical calcineurin inhibitors. Large-scale multi-modality, prospective trials in which head-to-head comparisons interventions are compared are required to definitely assess the cost-effectiveness of OLP treatments.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of medial vascular calcifications in the oral and maxillofacial region and their association with systemic diseases.Materials and MethodsThe study included 211 consecutive patients with systemic diseases (January 2015–May 2016). Medical history and radiographic images were evaluated. Univariate analysis (t‐test) was performed for continuous variables (age). The Chi square test was applied for the categorical variables (Mönckeberg medial arteriosclerosis [MMA], gender).ResultsThere was a 6.2% prevalence of MMA. The mean age of patients with MMA was 65.46 ± 13.38. The prevalence of kidney disease in patients with MMA was significantly higher than in those without MMA (p < 0.001). This finding was maintained even after adjusting for other systemic diseases (OR = 31.84 [8.63–136.78]).ConclusionA significant prevalence of MMA in kidney disease patients was observed in this pilot study.

No abstract

e15106 Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat a variety of cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported. Oral manifestations of irAEs include stomatitis, oral ulcers, and xerostomia. However, the trajectory and frequency of oral irAEs remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, trajectory and nature of oral irAEs and their association with primary cancer diagnosis and other irAEs. Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review using the Partners Research Patient Data was performed for all patients treated with ICIs at Partners Healthcare hospitals and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 12/2011 and 9/2019. Keywords specific to oral irAE such as oral mucositis, stomatitis or mouth sore were used. We collected data on demographics, cancer features, treatments, and characteristics of oral irAEs. Results: 822 of 4683 patients who received ICIs therapy were identified by keyword filtering. Lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and skin cancer (including melanoma) were the most common types of primary malignancies with a frequency of 35.5%, 12.4 % and 11.7%, respectively. Oral irAEs were identified in 106 patients with the median age of 69 (range: 29-92) years and the female to male ratio of 1:1. 57.5% (n = 61) presented with symptomatic oral mucosal lesions. 47.2% (n = 50) had xerostomia and 17.0% (n = 18) had dysgeusia. The median time from the date of ICIs initiation to the date of oral irAE onset was 105 days (range: 2-631 days) in patients presented with oral mucosal lesions, 103 days (2-860 days) in xerostomia patients, and 156 days (range: 5-836 days) in dysgeusia patients. Melanoma was the most common cancer seen in oral irAE patients (30.2%), followed by lung cancer (26.4%) and oral/oropharyngeal cancer (12.3%). 60, 42, and 12 patients received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. 86.8% of oral irAE patients received only one type of ICIs therapy. Concomitant cutaneous, intestinal, and rheumatological irAEs were commonly reported with a frequency of 19.4%, 15.3%, and 12.2%, respectively in those patients. Conclusions: Oral irAEs can present with both acute and chronic onset in patients with ICIs therapy but are not as common as oral AEs associated with conventional cytotoxic regimens. While data relative to capturing oral irAEs is still preliminary, the current provides insight into their nature and course. Prospective studies focused on assessing the impact of ICI on oral irAEs are likely to provide additional insight into the character, course and impact of these conditions.