How neuronal ensembles compute information is actively studied in early visual cortex. Much less is known about how local ensembles function in inferior temporal (IT) cortex, the last stage of the ventral visual pathway that supports visual recognition. Previous reports suggested that nearby neurons carry information mostly independently, supporting efficient processing (Barlow, 1961). However, others postulate that noise covariation effects may depend on network anisotropy/homogeneity and on how the covariation relates to representation. Do slow trial-by-trial noise covariations increase or decrease IT's object coding capability, how does encoding capability relate to correlational structure (i.e., the spatial pattern of signal and noise redundancy/homogeneity across neurons), and does knowledge of correlational structure matter for decoding? We recorded simultaneously from ϳ80 spiking neurons in ϳ1 mm 3 of macaque IT under light neurolept anesthesia. Noise correlations were stronger for neurons with correlated tuning, and noise covariations reduced object encoding capability, including generalization across object pose and illumination. Knowledge of noise covariations did not lead to better decoding performance. However, knowledge of anisotropy/homogeneity improved encoding and decoding efficiency by reducing the number of neurons needed to reach a given performance level. Such correlated neurons were found mostly in supragranular and infragranular layers, supporting theories that link recurrent circuitry to manifold representation. These results suggest that redundancy benefits manifold learning of complex high-dimensional information and that subsets of neurons may be more immune to noise covariation than others.
Psychophysical visual experiments have shown illusory motion reversal (IMR), in which the perceived direction of motion is the opposite of its actual direction. The tactile form of this illusion has also been reported. However, it remains unclear which stimulus characteristics affect the magnitude of IMR. We closely examined the effect of stimulus characteristics on IMR by presenting moving sinusoid gratings and random-dot patterns to 10 participants’ fingerpads at different spatial periods, speeds, and indentation depths. All participants perceived a motion direction opposite to the veridical direction some of the time. The illusion was more prevalent at spatial periods of 1 and 2 mm and at extreme speeds of 20 and 320 mm/s. We observed stronger IMR for gratings and much weaker IMR for a random-dot pattern, indicating that edge orientation might be a major contributor to this illusion. These results show that the optimal parameters for IMR are consistent with the characteristics of motion-selective neurons in the somatosensory cortex, as most of these neurons are also orientation-selective. We speculate that these neurons could be the neural substrate that accounts for tactile IMR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.