No abstract

Supporting multi-language linking such as linking C and handwritten assembly modules in the verified compiler CompCert requires a more compositional verification technique than that used in CompCert just supporting separate compilation. The two extensions, CompCertX and Compositional CompCert, supporting multi-language linking take different approaches. The former simplifies the problem by imposing restrictions that the source modules should have no mutual dependence and be verified against certain well-behaved specifications. On the other hand, the latter develops a new verification technique that directly solves the problem but at the expense of significantly increasing the verification cost.In this paper, we develop a novel lightweight verification technique, called RUSC (Refinement Under Self-related Contexts), and demonstrate how RUSC can solve the problem without any restrictions but still with low verification overhead. For this, we develop CompCertM, a full extension of the latest version of CompCert supporting multi-language linking. Moreover, we demonstrate the power of RUSC as a program verification technique by modularly verifying interesting programs consisting of C and handwritten assembly against their mathematical specifications.

No abstract

A central concern for an optimizing compiler is the design of its intermediate representation (IR) for code. The IR should make it easy to perform transformations, and should also afford efficient and precise static analysis. In this paper we study an aspect of IR design that has received little attention: the role of undefined behavior. The IR for every optimizing compiler we have looked at, including GCC, LLVM, Intel's, and Microsoft's, supports one or more forms of undefined behavior (UB), not only to reflect the semantics of UB-heavy programming languages such as C and C++, but also to model inherently unsafe low-level operations such as memory stores and to avoid over-constraining IR semantics to the point that desirable transformations become illegal. The current semantics of LLVM's IR fails to justify some cases of loop unswitching, global value numbering, and other important "textbook" optimizations, causing long-standing bugs. We present solutions to the problems we have identified in LLVM's IR and show that most optimizations currently in LLVM remain sound, and that some desirable new transformations become permissible. Our solutions do not degrade compile time or performance of generated code.

Production compilers such as GCC and LLVM are large complex software systems, for which achieving a high level of reliability is hard. Although testing is an effective method for finding bugs, it alone cannot guarantee a high level of reliability. To provide a higher level of reliability, many approaches that examine compilers' internal logics have been proposed. However, none of them have been successfully applied to major optimizations of production compilers. This paper presents Crellvm: a verified credible compilation framework for LLVM, which can be used as a systematic way of providing a high level of reliability for major optimizations in LLVM. Specifically, we augment an LLVM optimizer to generate translation results together with their correctness proofs, which can then be checked by a proof checker formally verified in Coq. As case studies, we applied our approach to two major optimizations of LLVM: register promotion mem2reg and global value numbering gvn, having found four new miscompilation bugs (two in each).

Contextual refinement and separation logics are successful verification techniques that are very different in nature. First, the former guarantees behavioral refinement between a concrete program and an abstract program while the latter guarantees safety of a concrete program under certain conditions (expressed in terms of pre and post conditions). Second, the former does not allow any assumption about the context when locally reasoning about a module while the latter allows rich assumptions.In this paper, we present a new verification technique, called abstraction logic (AL), that inherently combines contextual refinement and separation logics such as Iris and VST, thereby taking the advantages of both. Specifically, AL allows us to locally verify a concrete module against an abstract module under separationlogic-style pre and post conditions about external modules. AL are fully formalized in Coq and provides a proof mode that supports a combination of simulation-style reasoning using our own tactics and SL-style reasoning using IPM (Iris Proof Mode). Using the proof mode, we verified various examples to demonstrate reasoning about ownership (based on partial commutative monoids) and purity (𝑖.𝑒., termination with no system call), cyclic and higher-order reasoning about mutual recursion and function pointers, and reusable and gradual verification via intermediate abstractions. Also, the verification results are combined with CompCert, so that we formally establish behavioral refinement from top-level abstract programs, all the way down to their assembly code.

Prior work on multi-language program verification has achieved impressive results, including the compositional verification of complex compilers. But the existing approaches to this problem impose a variety of restrictions on the overall structure of multi-language programs (e.g. fixing the source language, fixing the set of involved languages, fixing the memory model, or fixing the semantics of interoperation). In this paper, we explore the problem of how to avoid such global restrictions. Concretely, we present DimSum : a new, decentralized approach to multi-language semantics and verification, which we have implemented in the Coq proof assistant. Decentralization means that we can define and reason about languages independently from each other (as independent modules communicating via events), but also combine and translate between them when necessary (via a library of combinators). We apply DimSum to a high-level imperative language Rec (with an abstract memory model and function calls), a low-level assembly language Asm (with a concrete memory model, arbitrary jumps, and syscalls), and a mathematical specification language Spec. We evaluate DimSum on two case studies: an Asm library extending Rec with support for pointer comparison, and a coroutine library for Rec written in Asm. In both cases, we show how DimSum allows the Asm libraries to be abstracted to Rec-level specifications, despite the behavior of the Asm libraries not being syntactically expressible in Rec itself. We also verify an optimizing multi-pass compiler from Rec to Asm, showing that it is compatible with these Asm libraries.

Fairness properties, which state that a sequence of bad events cannot happen infinitely before a good event takes place, are often crucial in program verification. However, general methods for expressing and reasoning about various kinds of fairness properties are relatively underdeveloped compared to those for safety properties. This paper proposes FOS (Fair Operational Semantics), a theory capable of expressing arbitrary notions of fairness as an operational semantics and reasoning about these notions of fairness. In addition, FOS enables thread-local reasoning about fairness by providing thread-local simulation relations equipped with separation- logic-style resource algebras. We verify a ticket lock implementation and a client of the ticket lock under weak memory concurrency as an example, which requires reasoning about different notions of fairness including fairness of a scheduler, fairness of the ticket lock implementation, and even fairness of weak memory. The theory of FOS, as well as the examples in the paper, are fully formalized in Coq.