human papilloma virus (HPV)-driven cancer, immune checkpoint blockade with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies produces tumor regression in only a minority of patients. Therapeutic HPV vaccines have produced strong immune responses to HPV-16, but vaccination alone has been ineffective for invasive cancer. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the efficacy of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint antibody, is amplified through treatment with ISA 101, a synthetic long-peptide HPV-16 vaccine inducing HPV-specific T cells, in patients with incurable HPV-16-positive cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this single-arm, single-center phase 2 clinical trial, 24 patients with incurable HPV-16-positive cancer were enrolled from December 23, 2015, to December 12, 2016. Duration of follow-up for censored patients was 12.2 months through August 31, 2017. INTERVENTIONS The vaccine ISA101, 100 μg/peptide, was given subcutaneously on days 1, 22, and 50. Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg, was given intravenously every 2 weeks beginning day 8 for up to 1 year. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Assessment of efficacy reflected in the overall response rate (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). RESULTS Of the 24 patients (4 women and 20 men; 22 with oropharyngeal cancer; median age, 60 years [range, 36-73 years]), the overall response rate was 33% (8 patients; 90% CI, 19%-50%). Median duration of response was 10.3 months (95% CI, 10.3 months to inestimable). Five of 8 patients remain in response. Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.5-9.4 months). Median overall survival was 17.5 months (95% CI, 17.5 months to inestimable). Grades 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 2 patients (asymptomatic grade 3 transaminase level elevation in 1 patient and grade 4 lipase elevation in 1 patient), requiring discontinuation of nivolumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The overall response rate of 33% and median overall survival of 17.5 months is promising compared with PD-1 inhibition alone in similar patients. A randomized clinical trial to confirm the contribution of HPV-16 vaccination to tumoricidal effects of PD-1 inhibition is warranted for further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02426892
Summary To explore whether bacterial secreted 4‐hydroxy‐2‐alkylquinolines (HAQs) can regulate host innate immune responses, we used the extracts of bacterial culture supernatants from a wild‐type (PA14) and two mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that have defects in making HAQs. Surprisingly, the extract of supernatants from the P. aeruginosa pqsA mutant that does not make HAQs showed strong stimulating activity for the production of innate cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor‐α and interleukin‐6 in the J774A.1 mouse monocyte/macrophage cell line, whereas the extract from the wild‐type did not. The addition of 4‐hydroxy‐2‐heptylquinoline (HHQ) or 2‐heptyl‐3,4‐dihydroxyquinoline (PQS, Pseudomonas quinolone signal) to mammalian cell culture media abolished this stimulating activity of the extracts of supernatants from the pqsA mutant on the expression of innate cytokines in J774A.1 cells and in the primary bronchoalveolar lavage cells from C57BL/6 mice, suggesting that HHQ and PQS can suppress the host innate immune responses. The pqsA mutant showed reduced dissemination in the lung tissue compared with the wild‐type strain in a mouse in vivo intranasal infection model, suggesting that HHQ and PQS may play a role in the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa. HHQ and PQS reduced the nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) binding to its binding sites and the expression of NF‐κB target genes, and PQS delayed inhibitor of κB degradation, indicating that the effect of HHQ and PQS was mediated through the NF‐κB pathway. Our results suggest that HHQ and PQS produced by P. aeruginosa actively suppress host innate immune responses.
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has consistently demonstrated clinical efficacy in metastatic melanoma. Recent widespread use of checkpoint blockade has shifted the treatment landscape, raising questions regarding impact of these therapies on response to TIL and appropriate immunotherapy sequence. Seventy-four metastatic melanoma patients were treated with autologous TIL and evaluated for clinical response according to irRC, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Immunologic factors associated with response were also evaluated. Best overall response for the entire cohort was 42%; 47% in 43 checkpoint-naïve patients, 38% when patients were exposed to anti-CTLA4 alone (21 patients) and 33% if also exposed to anti-PD1 (9 patients) prior to TIL ACT. Median overall survival was 17.3 months; 24.6 months in CTLA4-naïve patients and 8.6 months in patients with prior CTLA4 blockade. The latter patients were infused with fewer TIL and experienced a shorter duration of response. Infusion of higher numbers of TIL with CD8 predominance and expression of BTLA correlated with improved response in anti-CTLA4 naïve patients, but not in anti-CTLA4 refractory patients. Baseline serum levels of IL9 predicted response to TIL ACT, while TIL persistence, tumor recognition, and mutation burden did not correlate with outcome. This study demonstrates the deleterious effects of prior exposure to anti-CTLA4 on TIL ACT response and shows that baseline IL9 levels can potentially serve as a predictive tool to select the appropriate sequence of immunotherapies. .
SUMMARY Patients with systemic autoimmune diseases show increased incidence of atherosclerosis. However, the contribution of proatherogenic factors to autoimmunity remains unclear. We found that atherogenic mice (herein referred to as LDb mice) exhibited increased serum interleukin-17 (IL-17), which was associated with increased numbers of Th17 cells in secondary lymphoid organs. The environment within LDb mice was substantially favorable for Th17 cell polarization of autoreactive T cells during homeostatic proliferation, and this was substantially inhibited by antibodies directed against oxidized LDL (oxLDL). Moreover, the uptake of oxLDL induced dendritic cell-mediated Th17 polarization by triggering IL-6 production in a process dependent on TLR4, CD36, and MyD88. Furthermore, self-reactive CD4+ T cells expanded in the presence of oxLDL induced more profound experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. These findings demonstrate that proatherogenic factors promote the polarization and inflammatory function of autoimmune Th17 cells, which may be critical for the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and other related autoimmune diseases.
The Th2 locus control region (LCR) has been shown to be important in efficient and coordinated cytokine gene regulation during Th2 cell differentiation. However, the molecular mechanism for this is poorly understood. To study the molecular mechanism of the Th2 LCR, we searched for proteins binding to it. We discovered that transcription factor YY1 bound to the LCR and the entire Th2 cytokine locus in a Th2-specific manner. Retroviral overexpression of YY1 induced Th2 cytokine expression. CD4-specific knockdown of YY1 in mice caused marked reduction in Th2 cytokine expression, repressed chromatin remodeling, decreased intrachromosomal interactions, and resistance in an animal model of asthma. YY1 physically associated with GATA-binding protein-3 (GATA3) and is required for GATA3 binding to the locus. YY1 bound to the regulatory elements in the locus before GATA3 binding. Thus, YY1 cooperates with GATA3 and is required for regulation of the Th2 cytokine locus and Th2 cell differentiation. T h2 cytokine genes il4, il13, and il5 are clustered in chromosome 5 in human and chromosome 11 in mouse. The expression of the Th2 cytokine genes are coordinately regulated during Th2 cell differentiation. Several different regulatory elements have been shown to play an important role in Th2 cytokine gene expression, including promoters of Th2 cytokine genes, enhancers [conserved noncoding sequence 1 (CNS1)/hypersensitive site 1-3 (HSS1-3), hypersensitive site V (HSV)/CNS2, and intronic enhancer (IE)/ HSII], a silencer (HSIV), and a locus control region (LCR) (1, 2). The functions of these regulatory elements in Th2 cytokine expression in Th2 cells in vivo have been thoroughly investigated in transgenic mice and knockout mice that have targeted deletion in the regulatory elements (3-10). Among these regulatory elements, Th2 LCR has been shown to coordinately regulate Th2 cytokine genes, to induce chromatin remodeling, and to be required for chromosomal interactions (1, 2). The Th2 LCR is located in the introns of the Rad50 gene and is composed of four DNase I hypersensitive sites, including RHS4, RHS5, RHS6, and RHS7 (11,12). In previous studies, we have shown that the Th2 LCR is essential for Th2 cytokine expression and chromosome remodeling in the Th2 cytokine locus and in the pathogenesis of allergic asthma (7,11,13).The entire Th2 cytokine locus undergoes chromatin remodeling during Th2 cell differentiation (1, 2, 14). DNase I hypersensitive sites, which reflect accessibility of chromatin, are developed at the specific regulatory regions during Th2 cell differentiation (15, 16). Histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9)-acetylation and histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4)-methylation increase at specific regulatory regions in the Th2 cytokine locus during Th2 cell differentiation (17)(18)(19)(20). Th2 cytokine locus also undergoes DNA demethylation during Th2 cell differentiation (11,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Treatment with drugs that cause chromatin modification such as 5-azacytidine or Trichostatin A induces Th2 cytokine expression upon T-cell recep...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.