The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions can impact mental health. To quantify the mental health burden of COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a systematic

The estrogen receptor (ER)-beta isoform has been recently identified to be distinct from ERalpha isoform and regulates separate sets of genes, and can exert opposite signaling functions depending on the ligand and response elements. Previous studies of ERbeta have been at the mRNA level and few by immunohistochemistry, and the results are inconsistent. In this study the authors compared expression of ERbeta with those of other prognostic biomarkers by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray slides, and with morphologic parameters on 147 cases of primary breast cancer. Immunoreactivity of more than 10% of cancer cells was considered to be positive. Associations between categoric variables were analyzed using the chi test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. ERbeta was expressed in benign epithelium and stromal cells, and breast cancer cells in 59% of different histologic types of breast cancer. ERbeta was coexpressed with ERalpha in 45% of cases. There was a statistically significant association between expression of ERbeta and Her-2/neu (P<0.000), cathepsin D (P<0.02), p53 (P<0.03), and PS2 (P<0.002). Ki-67 was almost exclusively expressed in ERbeta-positive cells. No statistically significant association was seen between ERbeta expression and histologic grade, DNA ploidy, or S-phase.

The distinction between lobular neoplasia and infiltrating lobular carcinoma from ductal neoplasia and infiltrating duct carcinoma with equivocal histologic features may present a challenge as this distinction has important therapeutic implications. Although E-cadherin staining has been of value in helping to make this determination, the variability of the E-cadherin staining pattern and the immunohistochemistry techniques can be problematic in clinical practice. A total of 161 cases of breast lesions previously diagnosed as lobular neoplasia and infiltrating lobular carcinoma were selected from the departmental files. Three surgical pathologists interpreted them in a blinded manner for the histology diagnoses and E-cadherin staining. E-cadherin staining was conducted on the paraffin-embedded sections of the breast lesions using two different source antibodies. Our results using morphology and E-cadherin stain agreed with the previous diagnoses of lobular neoplasia and infiltrating lobular carcinoma in 140 of 161 cases (86.9%). Among the 140 cases, three pathologists agreed with the morphologic diagnoses of lobular neoplasia and infiltrating lobular carcinoma in 100 (71.4%), two pathologists in 26 (18.6%) and one pathologist in 14 (10%). All three pathologists disagreed with the previous diagnoses of lobular neoplasia and infiltrating lobular carcinoma but reevaluated as ductal lesions in 21 cases (13.0%). E-cadherin staining was confirmatory in 136 of total 161 cases (84.5%) of both lobular and duct lesions by showing the loss of staining in lobular lesions and the presence of complete membrane staining in duct lesions. Aberrant E-cadherin reactions were retained weak or partial incomplete thin membrane reaction in lobular-type lesions and reduced membrane reaction in ductal-type lesions were seen in 25 of the total 161 cases (15.5%). E-cadherin immunoreaction with two different antibodies showed discrepant results in 5 of 78 cases tested (6.4%). This study illustrates (1) interobserver variability of the morphologic diagnoses of lobular neoplasia/infiltrating lobular carcinoma and duct neoplasia/infiltrating duct carcinoma, (2) the occasional presence of aberrant E-cadherin stain pattern in these breast lesions and (3) variability of E-cadherin immunostaining results by two different antibodies.

ERβ, an ER subtype first identified in 1996, is highly expressed in different types of BCa including ERα-negative BCa and TNBC. Many studies on ERβ expression investigated mostly on ERβ1 protein expression in ERα-positive and ERα-negative BCa combined. The results are conflicting. This may be due to the complexity of ERβ isoforms, subject heterogeneity, and various study designs targeting different ERβ isoforms and either ERβ protein or mRNA expression, as well as to the lack of a standardized testing protocol. Herein, we simultaneously investigated both mRNA and protein expression of ERβ isoforms 1, 2, and 5 in different BCa subtypes and clinical characteristics. Patient samples (138) and breast cancer cell lines (BCC) reflecting different types of BCa were tested for ERα and ERβ mRNA expression using quantitative real-time PCR, as well as for protein expression of ERα, ERβ1, ERβ2, and ERβ5 isoforms, PR, HER2/neu, Ki-67, CK 5/6, and p53 using immunohistochemistry. Associations of ERβ isoform expression with clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. ERβ1, 2, and 5 isoforms are differentially expressed in different BCa subtypes including ERα-negative and TNBC. Each ERβ isoform seemingly plays a distinct role and is associated with clinical tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. ERβ isoform expression is significantly associated with >15% Ki-67 positivity and poor prognostic markers, and it predicts poorer OS, mostly in the subgroups. High ERβ2 and 5 isoform expression in ERα-negative BCa and TNBC is predictive of poor OS. Further investigation of ERβ isoforms in a larger cohort of BCa subgroups is needed to evaluate the role of ERβ for the potential usefulness of ERβ as a prognostic and predictive marker and for therapeutic use. The inconsistent outcomes of ERβ isoform mRNA or protein expression in many studies suggest that the standardization of ERβ testing would facilitate the use of ERβ in a clinical setting.

There are two estrogen receptor (ER) genes ( ESR1/ERα and ESR2/ERβ ) in humans. Of those. ERβ, the second ER isotype identified in 1996, is differentially expressed in different phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer (BCa), and is highly expressed in ERα-negative BCa and triple-negative BCa (TNBC). This review summarizes the potential clinical relevance of ERβ in BCa and the challenges associated with studies on the role of ERβ in BCa. The experimental and clinical studies evaluating clinical outcomes and associations with clinical characteristics and responses to endocrine therapy on targeting ERβ reviewed herein indicate that ERβ is a clinically important biomarker in BCa. The reviewed studies also suggest that each ERβ isoform has a distinct role in BCa subtypes and the potential of novel- targeted therapies in BCa, especially ERα-negative BCa and TNBC. However, the findings of many studies on ERβ are inconsistent, and the exact role of ERβ in BCa remains elusive; this may potentially be attributed to the complexity of ERβ isoforms, but also to the lack of standardized testing protocol. Thus, successful clinical application of ERβ requires the development of standardized, reproducible, and objective measurement methods for ERβ that can be widely and routinely applied in clinical setting.