Background The risk of developing hemorrhagic complications during or after emergency cholecystectomy in patients with antithrombic therapy (ATT) remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluate outcomes in patients with ATT undergoing emergency cholecystectomy and assess the relevance between ATT and perioperative complications including bleeding complications. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 296 patients who were diagnosed as acute cholecystitis and underwent emergency cholecystectomy between 2005 and 2017. One hundred and thirty‐three of them (45%) were on ATT. The primary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss over 500 ml and postoperative complications including bleeding complications. This study was approved by our institutional review board (#13072904). Results There were 23 patients (8%) who experienced intraoperative blood loss over 500 ml and nine postoperative bleeding complications (3%). Multivariable analyses showed that male sex (P = 0.027), Performance Status 2–4 (P = 0.031) and grade II or III acute cholecystitis (P = 0.033) were independent risk factors for intraoperative bleeding over 500 ml, whereas not single antiplatelet therapy (APT) use but multiple APT (P = 0.034) and anticoagulation therapy (ACT) (P = 0.032) were independently associated with postoperative bleeding complications. Additionally, laparoscopic surgery, but not ATT, was a significant prognostic factor for severe postoperative complications. Conclusions Single APT was not remained as an independently associated factor of intraoperative excessive bleeding or severe postoperative complications including bleeding complications. However, patients treated with multiple APT or ACT still represent a challenging group and must be carefully managed to avoid postoperative bleeding complications.

HighlightsThe ideal reconstruction method for pancreaticoduodenectomy following a gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y is proposed.Half patients in whom the past afferent limb was used for the reconstruction of the pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy experienced afferent loop syndrome.The Roux-en-Y method, using the distal intestine of previous gastrojejunostomy or jejunojejunostomy as a new jejunal limb for pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy, may be a better reconstruction method to avoid afferent loop syndrome.

No abstract

Since the beginning of laparoscopic liver surgery, resection of the posterosuperior segments has been considered one of the most challenging procedure due to its difficult access. The main drawbacks of the laparoscopic approach to dome lesions are poor visualization, the difficulty of instrumentation and the greater complexity in the control of bleeding. In the evolution of minimally invasive techniques from hybrid techniques to the current purely laparoscopic approaches, the different authors have established gradually the currents indications and surgical techniques to operate these segments with a similar feasibility and safety than open approach. The standardization in the patient position, the use of intercostal trocars, the learning curve in laparoscopic liver surgery, the management of the hepatic blood flow and the refinement of the technique in the extrahepatic and intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approaches, has allowed to leave behind the initial contraindications about the laparoscopic approach in these segments. In the present review of the literature, the accumulated experience of the different groups in minimally invasive liver surgery together with the technological advances in the different laparoscopic devices have facilitated the resection of tumors in segments 7 and 8 with similar and even better results than open surgery.

The sandwich approach is feasible as another standard dissective procedure for TAPP.