Unlike TE, TLE was associated with fewer postoperative complications than was OE, with no compromise of 2-year RFS. A randomized controlled trial with longer follow-up is needed.
Background A recent randomized controlled trial (Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer [ToGA] study) established standard scoring criteria of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) for gastric cancer and demonstrated the efficacy of trastuzumab for treating metastatic gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of HER2-positive cases by application of the standard criteria in patients with resectable gastric cancer and to examine the relationships between HER2 expression and prognosis, mucin phenotype, p53 status, and clinicopathological features. Methods A total of 213 patients were included in this retrospective study. All tumor samples were examined for HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization, and mucin and p53 expression by staining for CD10, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and p53.Results HER2-positive tumors were identified in 25 patients (11.7 %). HER2-positive cases were more frequently found in men, older patients, and in the intestinal histological type (P = 0.0048, 0.0309, and \0.0001, respectively). Although no association was found between HER2 overexpression and mucin phenotype, the expression of CD10 and p53 was significantly correlated with HER2 positivity (P = 0.0079 and 0.013). The overall survival of HER2-negative and -positive patients was not significantly different. However, in patients with stage III/ IV, overall survival was worse in HER2-positive patients (P = 0.0149). In a comparison between dual-color in situ hybridization (DISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), four IHC2?/3? cases that were DISH-positive were judged as negative by FISH. Conclusions Our study indicated that HER2 expression was less frequent in resectable gastric cancer than in metastatic gastric cancer. The impact of HER2 expression on survival was limited. DISH was superior to FISH for evaluating cases with limited HER2 expression.
To provide an overview of noninferiority trials in oncology with a special emphasis on methodologic issues, we conducted a systematic review of randomized trials assessing noninferiority of antineoplastic treatments. We identified 72 articles, of which 65 were randomized phase III trials with a single control arm, 3 were factorial phase III trials, and 4 were randomized phase II trials. Forty-six were trials in lung, colorectal, or breast cancer. The quality of reporting was improved chronologically (P < 0.01); the major deficiencies were claims of noninferiority when the results did not meet statistical criteria for noninferiority (7 articles) or when the noninferiority margin was not prespecified (5 articles). Four trials (6%) presented plans for switching from superiority to noninferiority. The analysis populations were intent to treat (ITT) in 52, perprotocol set (PPS) in 6, and both ITT and PPS in 11 trials. Noninferiority margins were set in 68 trials (94%); 1 trial used both of the conventional and effect retention methods, 17 trials used the conventional method, 5 trials used the effect retention method, and in 45 trials, the method was not specified. Some trials used margins that possibly were larger than the assured effects of the active controls. No trials explicitly took into consideration uncertainty in historical data. Two trials (3%) specified 2 values of margins. Our findings highlight critical deficiencies in design and reporting of noninferiority trials. Seven practical recommendations are presented.
The proportion of patients with sexual dysfunction after LTME is low. With the enhanced visibility of the laparoscope, inadvertent PAN injury was detected in a significant number of cases and associated with transient deterioration of sexual function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.