Colonic diverticular disease has been increasing in prevalence in Japan due to the rapidly aging population. Colonic diverticular bleeding can result in hemorrhagic shock requiring blood transfusion, and it carries a high risk of recurrence within 1 year. Colonic diverticulitis can cause abscess, fistula formation, and perforation of the colon that may require surgery, and it often recurs. As a result, patients with colonic diverticular disease are often bothered by required frequent examinations, re-hospitalization, and a consequent decrease in quality of life. However, the management of diverticular disease differs between Japan and Western countries. For example, computed tomography (CT) is readily accessible at Japanese hospitals, so urgent CT may be selected as the first diagnostic procedure for suspected diverticular disease. Endoscopic clipping or band ligation may be preferred as the first endoscopic procedure for diverticular bleeding. Administration of antibiotics and complete bowel rest may be considered as first-line therapy for colonic diverticulitis. In addition, diverticula occur mainly in the sigmoid colon in Western countries, whereas the right side or bilateral of the colon is more commonly involved in Japan. As such, diverticular disease in the right-side colon is more prevalent in Japan than in Western countries. Against this background, concern is growing about the management of colonic diverticular disease in Japan and there is currently no practice guideline available. To address this situation, the Japanese Gastroenterological Association decided to create a clinical guideline for colonic diverticular bleeding and colonic diverticulitis in collaboration with the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, and Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology. The steps taken to establish this guideline involved incorporating the concept of the GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines, developing clinical questions (CQs), accumulating evidence through a literature search and review, and developing the Statement and Explanation sections. This guideline includes 2CQs for colonic diverticulosis, 24 CQs for colonic diverticular bleeding, and 17 CQs for diverticulitis.

The pepsinogen test method can be used as a screening test for high-risk subjects with atrophic gastritis, rather than as a tool for cancer itself. Systemic endoscopic surveillance of this group is also useful.

The pepsinogen test method can be used as a screening test for high-risk subjects with atrophic gastritis, rather than as a tool for cancer itself. Systemic endoscopic surveillance of this group is also useful.

Serum pepsinogen (PG) has been used as biomarkers of gastric inflammation and mucosal status, including atrophic change, before the discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Serum pepsinogen I (PG I) and pepsinogen II (PG II) levels are known to increase in the presence of H. pylori-related nonatrophic chronic gastritis. The measurement of serum PG provides much information on the presence of intestinal metaplasia as well as atrophic gastritis. The eradication of H. pylori provokes a significant change in serum PG values: it reduces both PG I and PG II and elevates the PG I to PG II ratio. Recently, the serum PG test method has been the first screening step in Japan, as well as photofluorography. Serum PG tests are used to screen for high risk subjects with atrophic gastritis, rather than as a test for cancer itself. Unlike photofluorography or endoscopy, serum PG screening can identify nonulcerated differentiated asymptomatic cancer, irrespective of the size and location of the lesion. Most cases detected by the PG method are asymptomatic early gastric cancers and are limited to the mucosa, which are particularly well suited for endoscopic treatment. The PG method can contribute greatly to the patients' quality of life.KEY WORDS: atrophic gastritis, gastric cancer screening, non-atrophic gastritis, serum pepsinogens I and II.

1. The [(13)C]-acetate breath test (ABT) quantifies gastric emptying as the half [(13)CO(2)]-excretion time (T(1/2b)), but T(1/2b) differs from the scintigraphic half-emptying time (T(1/2s)). The aims of the present study were to accurately determine the half-emptying time by ABT with Wagner-Nelson analysis (T(1/2WN)), to compare T(1/2WN) with T(1/2s) and to validate the Wagner-Nelson strategy in ABT. 2. For a comparative study, eight volunteers simultaneously underwent ABT and scintigraphy. Anterior images were acquired and breath samples were collected every 15 min for 4.0 h after ingestion of a 200 kcal liquid meal labelled with 37 MBq [(99m)Tc]-colloidal sulphur and 100 mg [(13)C]-acetate. For the validation experiment, another six volunteers underwent ABT, on two randomized occasions, using the 200 kcal liquid meal with 100 mg [(13)C]-acetate. On either of the two occasions, a gel-forming agent was stirred into the meal to intentionally delay gastric emptying by increasing meal viscosity. Breath samples were collected at regular 15 min intervals for 4 h post ingestion. 3. The Wagner-Nelson equation for ABT is F(t) = (A(breath)(t) + C(t)/0.65)/A(breath)(infinity), where F(t) is a fractional dose of the [(13)C] label emptied, C(t) is the [(13)CO(2)] excretion (% dose/h), A(breath)(t) is the area under the C(t) curve (% dose) and A(breath)(infinity) is the ultimate [(13)CO(2)] recovery in breath (% dose). The percentage gastric retention was estimated as 100 x (1 - F(t)). The time plots of scintigraphic activity and 100 x (1 - F(t)) were fitted to y(t) = 100 x e(-Kxt), K values were estimated mathematically for each plot by regression analysis and T(1/2s) and T(1/2WN) were calculated as (ln2)/K. The time versus pulmonary [(13)CO(2)] excretion plots were fitted to z(t) = m x k x beta x e(-kt)(1 - e(-kxt))(beta-1), where m, k and beta are constants; T(1/2b) was calculated as -(ln(1 - 2(-1/beta))]/k. 4. Values of T(1/2WN) were closer to T(1/2s) than T(1/2b), although T(1/2WN) and T(1/2b) yielded significant under- and overestimation of T(1/2s), respectively. The high viscosity meal significantly prolonged T(1/2WN) and T(1/2b); T(1/2WN) could detect the delayed transit of the viscous meal more sensitively than T(1/2b). 5. The Wagner-Nelson method improves the accuracy of the ABT.